Journal archive · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2012
Indian American rhinoplasty: an emerging ethnic group
Patel SM, Daniel RK.
What this paper says
Among 35 Indian Americans unhappy with their nose, most complained of a hump, a drooping tip or a large nose, their self-chosen ideal nose-lip angle averaged 101.6 degrees, and review of 20 operated cases pointed to a conservative surgical approach.
Overview
Indian American patients form a growing share of US rhinoplasty practices, and their goals differ from those of other groups. The authors studied the cultural attitudes of Indian Americans toward aesthetic surgery, defined their aesthetic ideal for the nose by letting patients morph their own photographs, and reviewed operated cases to derive surgical strategies.
Sections of note
- 35 patients: 15 prospective, 20 retrospective.
- Group 1: 15 Indian American women; standard photographs, anthropometric measurements, and front and side views morphed to each patient's subjective ideal, then compared with the actual.
- Group 2: 20 consecutive Indian American rhinoplasties with 1 to 6 years of follow-up.
- Most group 1 complaints: dorsal hump, downwardly rotated tip, large nose.
- Mean subjective ideal nasolabial angle: 101.6 degrees.
- Three categories of nasal deformity identified with operative strategies for each.
- The 20 clinical cases indicated a more conservative approach is warranted.
- Level of evidence: therapeutic, IV.
What it means for a patient
- Indian American patients in this study wanted a smaller, straighter nose with a modestly lifted tip, not a Western-style upturned tip.
- Over-reduction is the risk; the authors favor restraint.
- Small sample, women only in the prospective group, and the abstract gives no satisfaction or revision figures.
Why this paper matters
It is one of the first papers to define an aesthetic target for South Asian rhinoplasty patients from their own preferences rather than Caucasian norms. Outcome data on the proposed strategies are not reported.
Terms
- Ethnic rhinoplasty: nose surgery that preserves features typical of the patient's ancestry.
- Nasolabial angle: the angle between the columella and the upper lip, a measure of tip rotation.
- Anthropometric measurements: standardized measurements of the face.
- Morphing: digitally altering a photograph to preview a possible result.
- Dorsal hump: the bump on the bridge made of bone and cartilage.
- Tip rotation: how far the tip points up or down.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The goal of this article is to help U.S. plastic surgeons better understand why Indian American rhinoplasty is different from other ethnic rhinoplasties in their practice. The study is composed of three parts: a review of the cultural perspectives of Indian Americans toward aesthetic surgery, an investigation into the…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2012.
- ASJ Operative techniques in Asian rhinoplastyKim EK, Daniel RK2012PMID 23110932Summary
- ASJ The oscillating micro-saw: a safe and pliable instrument for transverse osteotomy in rhinoplastyAvsar Y2012PMID 22738757Summary
- APS A modified technique of septal extension using a septal cartilage graft for short-nose rhinoplasty in AsiansHuang J, Liu Y2012PMID 22890858Summary
- APS Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplastyFatemi MJ, Rajabi F, Moosavi SJ et al.2012PMID 21993575Summary
- APS Structured nonsurgical Asian rhinoplastyKim P, Ahn JT2012PMID 22350307Summary
- Arch FPS Nasal measurements in Asians and high-density porous polyethylene implants in rhinoplastyJang D, Yu L, Wang Y et al.2012PMID 22801762Summary
- PRS 2012PMID 23190818
- PRS 2012PMID 22418718Summary