rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

The psychology of rhinoplasty

Two-sentence lead. About one in three people who seek rhinoplasty screen positive for at least moderate body dysmorphic disorder symptoms, and revision patients and those with a psychiatric history are at higher risk. The surgeon's job before the operation is the diagnosis of the patient as much as the nose.

The numbers, in the authors' words

  • Picavet 2011 (PRS, n = 226, Leuven + Heraklion): "Thirty-three percent of patients showed at least moderate symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder. Aesthetic goals (p < 0.001), revision rhinoplasty (p = 0.003), and psychiatric history (p = 0.031) were associated with more severe symptoms. There was no correlation between the objective and subjective scoring of the nasal shape." Conclusion: "Patients undergoing revision rhinoplasty and with psychiatric history are particularly at risk." Instruments: Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for BDD; Derriford Appearance Scale 59. Level of evidence: Risk, III.
  • de Souza 2021 (Aesthetic Plast Surg, n = 57 candidates vs 31 controls, Curitiba): "The prevalence of the disorder was 35.1% in the RG and 3.2% in the CG." BDD-positive candidates reported worse nasal function (higher NOSE and SNOT-22). "BDD affects about one-third of the rhinoplasty candidate population." Instrument: BDSS ≥ 6. Level III.
  • Lee, Zwiebel, Guyuron 2013 (PRS, 100 consecutive secondary cases): "The senior author saw significantly more nasal deformities than the patients themselves… There is often a disparity between what the patient sees and what the surgeon observes." Most common complaint in revision patients: airway occlusion (65%).

What the page explains (surgeon-language sections)

  1. Definition. BDD (DSM-5): preoccupation with a perceived defect not observable or slight to others, repetitive behaviors, clinically significant distress. Rhinoplasty is the procedure most associated with it.
  2. Screening in the consult. BDDQ / BDD-YBOCS / BDSS; the "no correlation between objective and subjective nasal scoring" finding (Picavet) is the clinical tell: distress out of proportion to the deformity.
  3. Red flags surgeons publish: minimal deformity with maximal distress; multiple prior surgeons; the revision patient who cannot name the flaw; unrealistic expectations; the "SIMON" heuristic (single, immature, male, overexpectant, narcissistic — attribute to its source before use).
  4. Why it matters surgically: BDD patients "are often not satisfied postoperatively" (de Souza) and are the population that generates litigation and repeat revision. Elective surgery is contraindicated in active BDD; psychiatric referral first.
  5. Measuring satisfaction properly. PROMs: Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE), FROI-17, RHINO, FACE-Q Rhinoplasty module, SCHNOS (Xiao 2019). The site recommends surgeons publish FACE-Q / SCHNOS results.
  6. Regret and the "over-operated nose." Link to /revision/ and to /famous/ (Hadid on record: "kept the nose of my ancestors").

Surgeons on the site who publish on this

Constantian (retired; BDD in rhinoplasty — history section), Guyuron (Top 50 #4; revision-patient perception study), Most (Top 50 #2; SCHNOS author — verify), Picavet/Hellings (Leuven — world list).

Gaps

  • Pull the 2019–2025 prevalence studies and any meta-analysis for a pooled BDD figure.
  • Constantian's book title/year on BDD and rhinoplasty (his site).
  • SCHNOS primary paper (Moubayed, Most et al., JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018 — confirm PMID).

Sources