rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · by topic

Cleft, trauma and reconstruction

171 papers with rhinoplasty in the title matching this topic, 2011 to 2026.

171
Papers
40
Start here
122
Abstracts on file
36
Open access
10
Journals
2011
First year
2026
Latest year
122
Summaries written
PRS54APS35FPS21ASJ19PRS-GO17JAMA FPS9FPSAM7FPS Clin5Arch FPS3CPS1
220114201222013122014820151120166201712201810201918202014202182022132023172024182025162026

What the literature says

Synthesised from the abstracts of the 40 papers listed under Start here. Every line carries the PubMed ID it rests on.

Two-sentence lead. Cleft and reconstructive rhinoplasty rebuild a nose with missing or distorted support; fixing the nose at the time of cleft lip repair does not appear to stunt nasal growth, 43% to 100% of those children avoid a later revision, and overcorrected primary repairs reach noncleft FACE-Q scores at skeletal maturity. Intermediate rhinoplasty with iliac crest cartilage cut later surgery in 372 procedures, irradiated cadaver rib matched autologous cartilage in 165 cleft rhinoplasties (complications 12% vs 10%), and for saddle noses and columellar defects surgeons match graft source to defect severity and report incisions and flaps that add projection without worse scars.

Key points

  • Primary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty, 25 articles: 10 of 10 subjective and 15 of 16 objective studies supported it; 8 of 9 growth studies found no nasal growth restriction; revision avoided in 43% to 100% at ≥6 years follow-up [36409217]
  • 800 cleft patients over 18 years, one surgeon: nasoalveolar molding, gingivoperiosteoplasty, primary closed or open rhinoplasty, postoperative stents and molding, secondary open septorhinoplasty; outcomes judged by panel and computer-assisted anthropometry [26579870]
  • Secondary cleft nasal sill classification, 276 patients (2019-2024): type I 13 (4.71%), II 25 (9.06%), III 73 (26.45%), IV 165 (59.78%); all improved sill aesthetics and symmetry [39572464]
  • Saddle nose, 60 patients (2016-2023): Type 1 66.7%, Type 2 25%, Type 3 5%, Type 4 3.3%; septal perforation 10%; septal cartilage 55%, auricular 28.3%, costal 15%; preoperative hyaluronic acid skin expansion reported for the first time in one contracted case [42324394]
  • V-shaped columella-labial incision vs inverted-V mid-columellar incision, 26 vs 26 reconstructive cases at 1 year: greater projection gain (adjusted p=0.002) and columellar height (p<0.001); Stony Brook scar scores no different (p=0.557) [41998166, 41681113]
  • Philtral flap with rib cartilage for columellar defects, 14 patients: respiratory index and nasal aesthetic index improved (p<.001); philtral length, columellar length, show, and Goode's ratio changed [41731229]
  • Prophylactic autospreader flaps in cosmetic primaries: keystone width reduced (p<0.0001) and sustained at 1 year; width at upper/lower lateral cartilages swelled at 1 and 6 months and normalized by 1 year (p=0.0011); 1 mm net width increase at 1 year not significant; NOSE and VAS worsened at 1 month and returned to preoperative by 1 year (p=0.0003, p=0.0012) [42415377]
  • Spreader graft vs spreader flap, 10 articles (n=567): no difference in dorsal aesthetic lines, valve angle, NOSE, or rhinomanometry; satisfaction favored graft [34864854]
  • Spreader grafts classified traditional, modified, splinting, reconstructive; spreader flaps designed by relation to septum and grafts [28033640]
  • Angulated cephalic strip flap for lateral crural reduction, 138 bulbous-tip patients, open septorhinoplasty: scroll area preserved; anterior-cephalic triangle resected to allow tip sutures; cephalic part folded and fixed; 0 technique-related revisions; 0 internal valve narrowing [39965762]
  • Double-ended self-retaining retractors (KAYIRAN-1, KAYIRAN-2): stainless steel, 180° rotation, spring fixation to drapes or Mayo stand; adjunct to handheld retraction; instrument description, Level V [42380315]
  • Primary Tajima overcorrection in 103 unilateral cleft patients followed to skeletal maturity vs 30 non-overcorrected and 27 noncleft: photogrammetric symmetry closer to noncleft on every parameter but nostril area (P<0.001); FACE-Q nose and nostril scores no different from noncleft (P>0.05); no intermediate rhinoplasty needed; Level III [36730430]
  • Longitudinal nostril morphology after primary Tajima overcorrection, 146 patients photographed at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 18 years: asymmetry improved over time; nostril height, width, nasal width and columella angle changed (P<0.01); nostril base height stayed stable [41949992]
  • Primary endonasal cleft rhinoplasty with lip repair at mean 3.9 months, 22 infants: alar symmetry ratio 0.099 before, -0.0012 after (overcorrected), regressing to about 0.05 by 4 months and stable thereafter [36976783]
  • Postsurgical nostril retainer after nasoalveolar molding and primary lip-nose repair, 24 vs 26 infants at 12 months: better cleft-side dimensions on all measures except projection and smaller cleft-noncleft differences on all six (p<0.05); Level III [35787611]
  • Primary septal cartilage rim graft in 60 unilateral cleft patients at 10 years (23 grafted): higher medial nostril height (P=0.031); smaller and shorter septal deviation (P<0.001); nasolabial angle and projection ratio unchanged [41100821]
  • Intermediate cleft rhinoplasty, 342 patients and 372 procedures over 18 years: iliac crest cartilage in 44.4%, none 40.3%, ear 9.7%, resorbable plate 5.1%; iliac crest graft (beta -0.234, P=0.012), V-Y chondromucosal flap in unilateral (beta -0.401) and columellar strut in bilateral clefts (beta -0.450) predicted fewer later rhinoplasties; 55.0% of 60 followed past 18 needed none; Level III [39560597]
  • Septal repositioning during intermediate cleft rhinoplasty at 5-6 years, 43 vs 34 controls followed to 9.28 years: nostril width ratio and caudal septal deviation angle improved at both follow-ups; Level III [37467053]
  • Secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with septal extension graft, 194 skeletally mature patients, 3D morphometry: bridge length, height, projection, dorsum and columellar angles increased; alar width and deviation decreased; nose still differed from matched controls [37797231]
  • Secondary bilateral cleft rhinoplasty with bilateral reverse-U flap and septal extension graft, 92 patients: columella, bridge, projection, tip definition and nostril orientation improved; complications 4%; upper lip deficiency unchanged [38314894]
  • Tajima reverse-U for secondary unilateral cleft, 96 patients with 5-year FACE-Q: nostril satisfaction 79.72 to 85.95 at 1 week and 82.61 at 5 years; correction held in ages 4-13 and mild to moderate deformity [38967637]
  • Nasal obstruction after secondary cleft rhinoplasty (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia): composite NOSE improved (P<0.05); lateral crural strut grafting linked to less blockage, alar revision and tip sutures to worse symptoms, stenting to easier breathing [36696324]
  • Irradiated homologous costal cartilage in 165 cleft rhinoplasties (ages 2-72, 30% revisions, median follow-up 256 days; 58% irradiated rib): complications 12% vs 10% autologous (p=0.3); irradiated rib infection 5, warping 2, extrusion 1; Level III [33370059]
  • Preservation principles in 6 cleft infants: Pitanguy ligament release and repositioning eased tip tension and helped midline alignment of the lower lateral cartilages [40358520]
  • Primary rhinoplasty in unilateral cleft lip CME: alar base repositioning, columellar centralization, tip projection and septoplasty with open, closed and conservative options [41563425]
  • In-house virtual planning with 3D-printed cutting guides and splints for craniofacial rhinoplasty: guides shaped septal and costochondral grafts, shortened surgery; ROE 18 of 24 [39161317]
  • Total nasal skeletal reconstruction in 25 of 253 revisions (mean 3.2 prior rhinoplasties): ROE 6.36 to 17.27, NOSE 80.33 to 53.33 at 1 year (P<0.001) [33506865]
  • V-shaped columella-labial incision in 91 multiply operated noses (1.74 prior rhinoplasties, 239.5 min): no dehiscence or vascular event; SCHNOS-O 52.86 to 18.43, SCHNOS-C 78.09 to 20.19 [40408098]
  • Alar nostril ring correction with antihelix composite grafts, 45 patients with a mean of 2 prior rhinoplasties: no graft failure including 10 with prior skin necrosis; SCHNOS-O 88.44 to 35.44, SCHNOS-C 88.30 to 35.85 [39676167]
  • Lateral crural repositioning and reconstruction in 42 revisions: SCHNOS-O, SCHNOS-C and both VAS scores improved at 3.1 and 11.5 months [37115534]
  • Y-columellar strut from auricular cartilage in 37 congenital, acquired or iatrogenic tip deformities: nasolabial angle rose regardless of type (P<0.00001); 3 congenital cases mildly deviated at 1 year [36729933]
  • Interalar ligament flap in 147 primary open structural cases: better supratip definition and less tip edema at 2, 6 and 12 months (P<0.01); Level III [37749799]
  • Reverse spare roof technique applies preservation principles to saddle nose and augmentation rhinoplasty, described as the first such application [35357956]
  • Septal perforation repair with pedicled anterior ethmoidal and greater palatine artery flaps under a preserved dorsum, 2 cases aged 62 and 65 [41071182]
  • Randomized trial, 84 patients: hump resection with spreader flaps vs dorsal preservation showed no difference at 1 year in any measured outcome [38366551]

Techniques and terms named

nasoalveolar molding [26579870], gingivoperiosteoplasty [26579870], nasal stents / nasal molding [26579870], primary cleft rhinoplasty [36409217], secondary open septorhinoplasty [26579870], nasal sill classification types I-IV [39572464], saddle nose Types 1-4 [42324394], filler-assisted skin expansion [42324394], V-shaped columella-labial incision with V-Y closure [41998166], inverted-V mid-columellar incision [41998166], Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale [41998166], philtral flap [41731229], costal cartilage [41731229], autospreader flap [42415377], spreader graft / spreader flap [34864854], mucoperichondrial spreader flap [33492387], traditional / modified / splinting / reconstructive spreader grafts [28033640], angulated cephalic strip flap (ACSF) [39965762], cephalic hinged flap [39965762], cephalic trim [39965762], scroll area preservation [39965762], lateral crural mid-down flap [41535507], low-temperature radiofrequency cartilage shaping ex vivo [40019820], self-retaining double-ended retractor [42380315], computer-assisted anthropometry [26579870], Goode's ratio [41731229], Tajima overcorrection [36730430, 41949992], primary endonasal cleft rhinoplasty [36976783], postsurgical nostril retainer [35787611], nasoalveolar molding [35787611], primary septal rim graft [41100821], intermediate cleft rhinoplasty with iliac crest cartilage [39560597], V-Y chondromucosal flap [39560597], septal repositioning at preschool age [37467053], septal extension graft in secondary cleft [37797231], bilateral reverse-U flap [38314894], Tajima reverse-U incision [38967637], nasal stenting after secondary cleft rhinoplasty [36696324], irradiated homologous costal cartilage in cleft [33370059], Pitanguy ligament release in infants [40358520], 3D-printed cutting guides and splints [39161317], total nasal skeletal reconstruction [33506865], V-shaped columella-labial incision [40408098], antihelix composite graft for alar ring [39676167], lateral crural repositioning [37115534], Y-columellar strut [36729933], interalar ligament flap [37749799], reverse spare roof technique [35357956], anterior ethmoidal and greater palatine artery flaps [41071182]

Numbers to remember

  • 43% to 100% of primary cleft rhinoplasty patients avoided revision at ≥6 years; 8 of 9 growth studies negative for restriction [36409217]
  • 800 cleft patients managed over 18 years [26579870]
  • 59.78% of 276 secondary cleft patients fell in sill type IV [39572464]
  • Costal cartilage used in 15% of 60 saddle noses; septal in 55% [42324394]
  • 138 ACSF patients, 0 revisions, 0 valve narrowing [39965762]
  • 52 patients: incision type independently predicted projection gain [41998166]
  • Tajima overcorrection: FACE-Q equal to noncleft at maturity, n=103 vs 27 [36730430]
  • Intermediate rhinoplasty: 55.0% of 60 followed past 18 needed no further surgery; iliac crest graft beta -0.234 [39560597]
  • Irradiated rib vs autologous in cleft: complications 12% vs 10% (p=0.3), n=165 [33370059]
  • Secondary bilateral cleft complications 4% of 92 [38314894]
  • Total skeletal reconstruction: ROE 6.36 to 17.27, NOSE 80.33 to 53.33, n=25 [33506865]
  • 0 dehiscence in 91 columella-labial incisions; 0 graft failure in 45 alar composite grafts [40408098, 39676167]

Numbers

Measure Value Population / study PMID
Avoided revision after primary cleft rhinoplasty 43% to 100% at 6 years or more 25 articles, systematic review [36409217]
No further rhinoplasty after intermediate cleft rhinoplasty 55.0% of those followed past 18 60 of 342 patients [39560597]
Intermediate rhinoplasty needed after Tajima overcorrection None in the cohort 103 unilateral cleft patients at maturity [36730430]
Growth restriction after primary cleft rhinoplasty 0 of 8 of 9 studies found it Systematic review [36409217]
Complications, secondary bilateral cleft rhinoplasty 4% 92 patients [38314894]
Complications, irradiated rib vs autologous in cleft 12% vs 10% (p=0.3) 165 cleft rhinoplasties [33370059]
Operative intervention for complications, autologous vs irradiated rib 86% vs 64% of complications 18 complications [33370059]
Septal perforation in saddle nose series 10% 60 patients [42324394]
Graft failure, antihelix composite grafts for alar ring 0 of 45 45 multiply operated patients [39676167]
Dehiscence or vascular event, columella-labial incision 0 of 91 91 patients [40408098]
Technique-related revision, angulated cephalic strip flap 0 of 138 138 bulbous tips [39965762]
FACE-Q nose and nostrils, Tajima vs noncleft No difference (P>0.05) 103 vs 27 [36730430]
FACE-Q nostril, secondary Tajima 79.72 to 85.95 (1 wk) to 82.61 (5 yr) 96 patients [38967637]
ROE and NOSE, total skeletal reconstruction 6.36 to 17.27; 80.33 to 53.33 25 patients at 1 year [33506865]
ROE, 3D-guided craniofacial rhinoplasty 18 of 24 Preliminary workflow report [39161317]
SCHNOS-O and SCHNOS-C, columella-labial incision 52.86 to 18.43; 78.09 to 20.19 91 patients, 1 year [40408098]
SCHNOS-O and SCHNOS-C, alar ring composite grafts 88.44 to 35.44; 88.30 to 35.85 45 patients, 1 year [39676167]
Alar symmetry ratio after primary endonasal cleft rhinoplasty 0.099 to -0.0012, stable near 0.05 from 4 months 22 infants [36976783]
Respiratory and aesthetic index, philtral flap columella Both improved (p<.001) 14 patients [41731229]

What is still contested or missing

  • Primary cleft rhinoplasty timing remains debated; most supporting studies carry significant risk of bias [36409217]
  • In cleft rhinoplasty "no one protocol or algorithm was proved to be completely satisfactory"; timing, approach, nonsurgical adjuncts, and outcome assessment remain controversial [26579870]
  • Philtral flap results rest on 14 patients; authors call for confirmation [41731229]
  • Mucoperichondrial spreader flap (857 cases) [33492387], mid-down flap letter and reply [41535507, 41879850], radiofrequency cartilage shaping [40019820], and the V-incision note [41681113] are title-only on file [33492387, 41535507, 41879850, 40019820, 41681113]
  • Timing of cleft rhinoplasty (primary overcorrection vs intermediate vs secondary) is argued from single-center cohorts in Taiwan, Philadelphia and Korea with different endpoints [36730430, 39560597, 37467053]
  • The intermediate-rhinoplasty authors call for risk-benefit, surgical-burden and patient-reported data that do not yet exist [39560597]
  • Irradiated rib in cleft rhinoplasty is judged equal on 165 cases with a median follow-up of 256 days [33370059]
  • Nostril retainer and ligament-release evidence comes from 50 and 6 infants [35787611, 40358520]
  • 3D-guided workflow is a preliminary report with a single ROE value [39161317]

Papers used

  • Battista RA et al.. Reconstructive Approach to Saddle Nose Deformity: A Diagnostic-Therapeutic Algorithm and the Preoperative Use of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Skin Expansion in Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42324394. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-06108-3
  • Xia Y et al.. A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 39572464. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-04526-9
  • Zelko I et al.. Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Results, Growth Restriction, and Avoiding Secondary Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36409217. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009924
  • Keyhan SO et al.. Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2022. PMID 34864854. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab409
  • Cabbarzade C. Mucoperichondrial Spreader Flap Application for Middle Vault Reconstruction in Rhinoplasty: A Review of 857 Cases. Aesthet Surg J 2021. PMID 33492387. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa333 (title only)
  • Apaydin F. Rebuilding the Middle Vault in Rhinoplasty: A New Classification of Spreader Flaps/Grafts. Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 28033640. DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1597144
  • Farouk A. Rhinoplasty in Clefts: An 18-Year Retrospective Review. Facial Plast Surg 2015. PMID 26579870. DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1564718
  • Jabbour N et al.. Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 42415377. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag145
  • Sazgar AA et al.. A Prospective Comparison of Inverted V Mid-columellar and V-Shaped Columellar-Labial Incisions in Reconstructive Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41998166. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05848-6
  • Bastaninejad S et al.. Columella Reconstruction Using the Philtral Flap in Patients with Columellar Deformity in Revision Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41731229. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05712-7
  • Mao F et al.. Letter to the Editor: "Lateral Crural Mid-Down Flap Technique in Primary Rhinoplasty". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41535507. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05645-1 (title only)
  • Kaderi S et al.. Response to the Letter to the Editor: "Lateral Crural Mid-Down Flap Technique in Primary Rhinoplasty". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41879850. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05739-w (title only)
  • Kayiran O. Self-Retaining, Double-Ended Surgical Retractor: A Novel Instrument for Rhinoplasty and Reconstructive Procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42380315. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-06049-x
  • Generalow A et al.. Angulated Cephalic Strip Flap in Lateral Crura Reduction: A Scroll Area Preservation Technique in Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 39965762. DOI 10.1055/a-2541-2708
  • Garcia JA et al.. Cartilage Shaping Ex-Vivo Using Low-Temperature Radiofrequency: An Accessible, Controlled Option for Cosmetic and Reconstructive Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2026. PMID 40019820. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0271 (title only)
  • Sazgar AA et al.. V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision: A Preferred Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised Noses. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2026. PMID 41681113. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0339 (title only)
  • Murali SP et al.. Long-Term Outcome of Primary Rhinoplasty with Overcorrection in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip: Avoiding Intermediate Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36730430. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009923
  • Huang CW et al.. Nasal Morphological Changes after Facial Maturation in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip Following Primary Overcorrected Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 41949992. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013104
  • Abdurrob A et al.. Longitudinal Anatomic Analysis of Primary Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty Outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023. PMID 36976783. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0301
  • Al-Qatami F et al.. Efficacy of Postsurgical Nostril Retainer in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Treated with Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding and Primary Cheiloplasty-Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022. PMID 35787611. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009426
  • Ueno K et al.. Primary Septal Cartilage Graft for Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: 10-Year Follow-Up Results and the Effect on Septal Deviation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 41100821. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012525
  • Ng JJ et al.. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39560597. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011878
  • Kim YC et al.. Septal Reposition during Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Second Chance for Correcting Caudal Septal Deviation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37467053. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010923
  • Saito T et al.. Septal Extension Graft in Cleft Rhinoplasty: Patients with Secondary Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37797231. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011106
  • Saito T et al.. Secondary Bilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: Achieving an Aesthetic Result. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38314894. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae019
  • Liu Y et al.. Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in Patients with Secondary Nasal Deformity: Optimal Indications for Tajima Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 38967637. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011608
  • Carlson AR et al.. A Longitudinal Study of Improvement in Nasal Airway Obstruction after Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36696324. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009851
  • Jenny HE et al.. Safety of Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Cleft Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021. PMID 33370059. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007431
  • Tanikawa D et al.. Introducing Preservation Rhinoplasty Principles to Cleft Nasal Surgery: Unveiling the Role of Nasal Ligaments in Infant Anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40358520. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012197
  • Chong DK et al.. Primary Rhinoplasty in Unilateral Cleft Lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 41563425. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012451
  • Rubio-Palau J et al.. In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 39161317. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae179
  • Sazgar AA et al.. The Effectiveness of Skeletal Reconstruction in Severe Post-Rhinoplasty Nasal Deformity. Aesthet Surg J 2021. PMID 33506865. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa323
  • Sazgar AA et al.. Strategic Use of the V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised Noses. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 40408098. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf060
  • Sazgar AA et al.. Single-Stage Alar Nostril Ring Correction Using Auricular Composite Grafts in Reconstructive Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 39676167. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae240
  • Abdelhamid AS et al.. Patient Outcomes in Lateral Crural Repositioning and Reconstruction in Revision Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 37115534. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0434
  • Martino C et al.. Y-Columellar Strut Graft: A Method for Reconstructing the Nasal Tip in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36729933. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009993
  • Marianetti TM et al.. Use of the Interalar Ligament Flap for Tip and Supratip Contouring in Primary Open Structural Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37749799. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011094
  • Ferreira MG, Santos M. Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Saddle Nose: The Reverse Spare Roof Technique. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022. PMID 35357956. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0036
  • Mariño-Sanchez F et al.. "Pedicled Flaps for Nasal Septal Perforation and Graft Framework: Enhancing Outcomes in Preservation and Structural Rhinoplasty". Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 41071182. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012511
  • Zarei R et al.. Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Trial. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38366551. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae038

Written by rhinoplasty.cc, 2026-09-08, from the PubMed abstracts; not medical advice.

Start here

The 40 papers the synthesis above was written from.

  1. APS
    2026PMID 42324394Summary
  2. APS
    2025PMID 39572464Summary
  3. PRS
    2023PMID 36409217Summary
  4. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  5. ASJ
    2021PMID 33492387
  6. FPS
    2016PMID 28033640Summary
  7. FPS
    2015PMID 26579870Summary
  8. ASJ
    2026PMID 42415377Summary
  9. APS
    2026PMID 41998166Summary
  10. APS
    2026PMID 41731229Summary
  11. APS
    2026PMID 41535507
  12. APS
    2026PMID 41879850Full text
  13. APS
    2026PMID 42380315Summary
  14. FPS
    2026PMID 39965762Summary
  15. FPSAM
    2026PMID 40019820
  16. FPSAM
    2026PMID 41681113
  17. PRS
    2023PMID 36730430Summary
  18. PRS
    2026PMID 41949992Summary
  19. FPSAM
    2023PMID 36976783Summary
  20. PRS
    2022PMID 35787611Summary
  21. PRS
    2026PMID 41100821Summary
  22. PRS
    2025PMID 39560597Summary
  23. PRS
    2024PMID 37467053Summary
  24. PRS
    2024PMID 37797231Summary
  25. ASJ
    2024PMID 38314894Summary
  26. PRS
    2025PMID 38967637Summary
  27. PRS
    2023PMID 36696324Summary
  28. PRS
    2021PMID 33370059Summary
  29. PRS
    2026PMID 40358520Summary
  30. PRS
    Primary Rhinoplasty in Unilateral Cleft Lip
    Chong DK, Tanikawa DYS, Fell M
    2026PMID 41563425Summary
  31. ASJ
    2025PMID 39161317Summary
  32. ASJ
    2021PMID 33506865Summary
  33. ASJ
    2025PMID 40408098Summary
  34. ASJ
    2025PMID 39676167Summary
  35. FPSAM
    2024PMID 37115534Summary
  36. PRS
    2023PMID 36729933Summary
  37. PRS
    2024PMID 37749799Summary
  38. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35357956Summary
  39. PRS
    2025PMID 41071182Summary
  40. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary

Related topics

38

Rib, ear and septal grafts

38 of the 171 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
38

Nasal tip

38 of the 171 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
38

Septum, valve and airway

38 of the 171 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
33

Revision and secondary rhinoplasty

33 of the 171 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic

Every paper, by year

171 papers. The 40 Start here papers are not repeated.

202616 papers · 14 above
  1. PRS
    PMID 41427759
  2. PRS
    PMID 41880548
202518 papers · 7 above
  1. APS
    PMID 40699341
  2. APS
    PMID 40195130Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 40394313Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 40646255Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 41338277Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    Comprehensive Cleft Rhinoplasty Throughout Development
    McCracken M, Woldanski L, Neumeister E et al.
    PMID 41101813Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 39911533Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 41050978Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 39816899Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 40642259Summary
  11. PRS-GO
    PMID 40502425Summary
202417 papers · 6 above
  1. APS
    PMID 37749417Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 39285056Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 38839614Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 38062265Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 37945758Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 37567945Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 38693403Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 38151040Summary
  9. FPS Clin
    Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty
    Liao D, Pereira N, Obayemi A Jr et al.
    PMID 37981415Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 39247573Summary
  11. PRS-GO
    PMID 38957724Summary
202313 papers · 5 above
  1. APS
    PMID 36323963Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 37097454
  3. APS
    PMID 37640816Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 37433309Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 36100245Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 36972604Summary
  7. FPS Clin
    PMID 36396285Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 37731727Summary
20228 papers · 3 above
  1. CPS
    Cleft Rhinoplasty
    Olds CE, Sykes JM
    PMID 34782130Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 35158388Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 36166381
  4. PRS-GO
    PMID 35999875Summary
  5. PRS-GO
    PMID 36381488Summary
202114 papers · 3 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 33674847
  2. ASJ
    PMID 33821953
  3. APS
    PMID 33811290Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 33507350Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 34075457Full text
  6. APS
    PMID 33837462
  7. FPS
    PMID 33556970Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 34398093Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 33764912
  10. PRS
    Secondary Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Nasal Deformity
    Rohrich RJ, Benkler M, Avashia YJ et al.
    PMID 34076624Summary
  11. PRS-GO
    PMID 34712542Full text
202018 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 31485763Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 31624893
  3. APS
    PMID 32778931Summary
  4. FPS
    Controversies in Cleft Rhinoplasty
    Hoshal SG, Solis RN, Tollefson TT
    PMID 32191966Summary
  5. FPSAM
    PMID 32628569Summary
  6. FPSAM
    PMID 32212970
  7. PRS
    PMID 31985674
  8. PRS
    PMID 31834232
  9. PRS
    PMID 32195860Summary
  10. PRS
    PMID 32332543
  11. PRS
    PMID 32332542Summary
  12. PRS
    PMID 31985675
  13. PRS
    PMID 31834230
  14. PRS
    PMID 33235001
  15. PRS
    PMID 32472910
  16. PRS
    PMID 32097325Summary
  17. PRS
    PMID 31985651Summary
  18. PRS
    PMID 32472912
201910 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 29394311Summary
  2. ASJ
    PMID 30107387Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 31263933Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 30868305Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 31639871Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 30566988Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 30601327Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 31403561
  9. PRS
    PMID 31688761Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 30881815Full text
201812 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 30084887
  2. APS
    PMID 29124376Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 29380021
  4. APS
    PMID 29392358
  5. FPS
    PMID 29857340Summary
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28910438Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 30326520Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 30247379
  9. PRS
    PMID 29608514
  10. PRS
    PMID 28953561
  11. PRS
    PMID 29608516
  12. PRS
    PMID 28938353
20176 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 29149246Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 28388792Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 28445370
  4. PRS
    PMID 28820829
  5. PRS
    PMID 28098711Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 28820828
201611 papers · 1 above
  1. FPS
    PMID 27097144Summary
  2. FPS
    Technique in Cleft Rhinoplasty: The Foundation Graft
    Gassner HG, Schwan F, Haubner F et al.
    PMID 27097143Summary
  3. FPS Clin
    PMID 27712813Summary
  4. FPS Clin
    PMID 27712816Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26720547
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26892673Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 27348671
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 27536492Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 27482502Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 27975028Summary
20158 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 26116747
  2. ASJ
    PMID 26116748
  3. JAMA FPS
    PMID 25996279
  4. JAMA FPS
    PMID 25996277
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26432958
  6. PRS
    PMID 26505717Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 26180711Summary
201412 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 25028737Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 24357194Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 24918702Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 24918706Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 24201895Summary
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 24458140Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 24867716Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 24776545Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 24776586
  10. PRS
    PMID 25415095Summary
  11. PRS
    PMID 24776585
  12. PRS-GO
    PMID 25289365Summary
20132 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 23636623Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 23564242Summary
20124 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 21938592Summary
  2. Arch FPS
    PMID 22006234Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 22723233Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 22373979Summary
20112 papers
  1. Arch FPS
    PMID 21079106Summary
  2. Arch FPS
    PMID 21576664