rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2014

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2014

Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts

Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK.

What this paper says

Among 46 patients who needed another operation after earlier rib cartilage grafting, 24 percent required a further revision, and those revisions were completed without complications needing more surgery.

Overview

Rib cartilage is used more and more in second time rhinoplasty, and some of those patients still need another operation afterward. This retrospective review looked at third stage rhinoplasty in patients whose previous surgery had used their own rib cartilage. The authors recorded why revision was needed, how often revision was needed again, whether rib cartilage use was planned, and what went wrong around surgery.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective review; 46 patients met the inclusion criteria.
  • Outcomes tracked were indication for revision, revision rate after the tertiary operation, whether rib grafting was planned, and perioperative events such as infection, structural collapse and scarring requiring further surgery.
  • The revision rate after tertiary rhinoplasty by the primary author was 24 percent, 11 of 46 patients.
  • Reasons for those further revisions were nasal airway obstruction in 6, dissatisfaction with appearance in 4, and infection in 1.
  • Outcomes of the revisions were reported as satisfactory, with no adverse complications requiring further surgery.
  • The paper is graded therapeutic level of evidence IV.

What it means for a patient

  • Noses previously rebuilt with rib cartilage can be operated on again, but the chance of needing yet another operation is higher than usual.
  • Breathing obstruction was the single most common reason for going back, ahead of appearance.
  • This is a single surgeon retrospective series with no comparison group and no follow-up length stated, so the 24 percent figure may not apply elsewhere.

Why this paper matters

It quantifies the downstream burden of rib cartilage rhinoplasty, a point rarely made when the graft is first chosen. It does not say which patients are most likely to need revision, or how long the final results hold.

Terms

  • Autologous costal cartilage: rib cartilage taken from the patient's own chest.
  • Secondary rhinoplasty: a second nose operation after the first.
  • Tertiary rhinoplasty: a third nose operation.
  • Revision rate: the share of patients who need a further operation.
  • Perioperative: the period around the operation, including recovery.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Costal cartilage grafts are used more frequently in secondary rhinoplasty. However, these procedures result in patients that require further revision operations that are not trivial. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of reconstructive rhinoplasty performed on patients with a history of prior…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2014
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2014.

  1. ASJ
    2014PMID 25158684Summary
  2. ASJ
    2014PMID 25028737Summary
  3. APS
    2014PMID 24357194Summary
  4. APS
    2014PMID 25028110
  5. APS
    2014PMID 24788856Summary
  6. APS
    2014PMID 25303879Summary
  7. FPS
    2014PMID 24918702Summary
  8. FPS
    2014PMID 24918706Summary