rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · by topic

Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty

167 papers with rhinoplasty in the title matching this topic, 2011 to 2026.

167
Papers
40
Start here
136
Abstracts on file
37
Open access
10
Journals
2011
First year
2026
Latest year
136
Summaries written
APS55PRS27FPS24ASJ17FPS Clin16PRS-GO8CPS7JAMA FPS6FPSAM5Arch FPS2

What the literature says

Synthesised from the abstracts of the 40 papers listed under Start here. Every line carries the PubMed ID it rests on.

Two-sentence lead. Rhinoplasty planned around the patient's own nasal anatomy rather than a Caucasian template produces higher satisfaction and about half the complication and revision rates in pooled data, and AI morphing to capture ethnic preference cut revisions from 19% to 8% in 784 African American patients. Asian, Middle Eastern, and African-descent noses show distinct structural patterns that drive technique choice (infection 0.84% overall but 3.63% in Asian revisions; autograft resorption 50% or more long term), and newer classification systems replace ethnic labels with anatomic ones.

Key points

  • Meta-analysis, 17 comparative studies (2003-2023): ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty satisfaction SMD 0.68 [95% CI 0.63-0.73], p<0.001; complications 8.7% vs 17.4% and revisions 5.3% vs 12.1% for conventional methods; I2=0% [40906288]
  • Satisfaction SMD by group: multi-ethnic 0.76, African-American 0.71, Middle Eastern 0.63, Indian 0.58, Asian 0.55, Caucasian 0.21 [40906288]
  • Body dysmorphic disorder in Asian rhinoplasty seekers, 15 studies (n=1,977): pooled prevalence 30.0% (95% CI 26.8-35.7); 36% by BDD Questionnaire vs 18% by DSM-V criteria [40907540]
  • Systematic review, 14 of 558 studies (2000-2023): Asian rhinoplasty used grafting and minimally invasive approaches; Hispanic rhinoplasty addressed nasolabial angle; graft-supported techniques had lower complications [40494973]
  • Asian nose classification into 4 types by bone/cartilage strength and skin-soft tissue envelope thickness: Type I thin SSTE/strong, II thin/weak, III thick/strong, IV thick/weak; interrater kappa 0.933 (95% CI 0.852-1.014) [39529302]
  • Anatomic classification grouping projection, rotation, skin thickness, and anthropometrics proposed to replace ethnic or racial terms [39142701]
  • Middle Eastern primary rhinoplasty, 100 consecutive (28 male, 72 female, ≥1 year follow-up): dorsal hump 91%, septal deviation 85%, bulbous tip 81%, drooping tip 78%, nostril asymmetry 76%, thick or moderately thick skin 53%, wide bones 47%, alar flaring 38% [40855021]
  • Nonsurgical rhinoplasty in 487 patients of African descent (2018-2021): indications lack of bridge definition 63.9%, excess alar width 61.6%, bulbous tip 61.6%; median filler 0.6 mL (0.3-2.1 mL) at first visit; 0 infection, vascular occlusion, or necrosis [37344935]
  • East Asian nonsurgical tip-dorsum-glabella protocol, 528 patients (490 female, 38 male; mean age 27.7): at 9 months in 426 full-protocol patients nasal length +2.62 mm, tip projection +3.69 mm, nasolabial angle +5.7°, nasofrontal angle -9.4° (all p<0.001); FACE-Q satisfaction +44.4; 0 vascular complications; 11 transient erythema [42443422]
  • Asian short nose, 324 patients: revision 6.5% with SEG + derotation graft, 10.6% SEG alone, 14.3% derotation graft + columellar strut [41990353]
  • Closed Asian rhinoplasty with auricular cartilage only (framework + diced dorsum), 63 patients aged 18-45 (mean 25.6): all measures improved (P<.05); nasal volume +2.9 mL; no volume change between 6 and 12 months [41411306]
  • Pollybeak in Asian patients, 53 cases: SFRS 2.34 to 0.23; VAS 7.47 to 1.79; ROE satisfaction 77.36%; no complications [37798507]
  • Fascia graft for alar base (paranasal) depression in Asian rhinoplasty, 52 patients: grayscale 0.720 to 0.583 (P<0.05); no displacement [41813990]
  • Systematic Asian rhinoplasty approach, 110 cases in 4 years, follow-up 6-48 months: satisfactory results in 86 percent [25028852]
  • African American rhinoplasty with cadaveric structural grafts, 392 patients planned with Deep Surface AI morphing vs 392 without: complications 2% vs 3%, revisions 8% vs 19%; aesthetic gain 3.2 vs 2.0; anxiety -8.4 vs -5.2, depression -7.8 vs -1.3, meaning and purpose +4.9 vs +1.9 [42153758]
  • Infection after 2,630 East Asian rhinoplasties over 16 years (one surgeon): 0.84% overall (22); revision 3.63% vs primary 0.19% (19-fold); women 3.6 times as likely (p=0.002); autologous costal cartilage 3.39%; simultaneous septal perforation repair 8.57%; MRSA in 8; tip 45%, caudal septum or columella 32%; debridement in 90.9% [35511054]
  • Columellar scar after open rhinoplasty in 529 Asian patients (234 with 6 months' follow-up): problematic scar 6.0% (wide or depressed 1.7%, notching 1.3%, hyperpigmentation 1.7%, hypertrophic marginal 0.8%, necrosis 0.4%); erythema normalized by a mean of 66.7 days; costal tip grafts raised scar risk 8.0% vs 3.3% (P=.02) [26822626]
  • Long-term resorption of autologous dorsal onlays in East Asian rhinoplasty (2009-2018): rolled mastoid fascia resorbed most, rolled sacral dermis next, diced cartilage in mastoid fascia least; at least 50% resorption in almost all groups; Level III [35077410]
  • Molded glued diced costal cartilage for dorsal augmentation, 80 Asian patients: satisfied 82.5%; complications 23.8% (19); revision 10% (8), one for resorption; 3D scans showed height gain without widening and no loss between 3 months and 1 year [35877941]
  • 3D-printed customized silicone implants vs prefabricated for mild dorsal deviation or hump in Asian rhinoplasty: customized implants gave greater improvement in deviation and hump angle [42154478]
  • Chimeric dorsal-glabellar construct with I-shaped implants, 19 vs 30 patients: radix transposition vector 26.1 vs 63.4 degrees (P<.0001); nasal height gain 107% vs 113% and bridge length 105% vs 118% (P<.0001); nasofrontal angle +6 degrees in both [26879296]
  • Subdorsal cantilever graft (Toriumi) raises a low ethnic dorsum from beneath: type A under the bony dorsum with limited radix elevation, type B through a radix osteotomy from radix to supratip; keeps dorsal aesthetic lines and narrows under control [35724256]
  • Dual-plane diced rib cartilage (sub-SMAS plus subperiosteal, rectus fascia wrap) in 54 ethnic primaries, mean 17.3 months: 50 of 54 very satisfactory or outstanding by blinded surgeons; 0 resorption, infection or skin problems [40493956]
  • Crushed cartilage with fibrin sealant for radix augmentation in 51 Asian patients, mean 18.5 months: radix projection +28.5%, nasofrontal angle +11.5 degrees; excellent 41.2%, good 37.3%, fair 15.7%, poor 5.9%; partial resorption 2.0%, visibility 3.9% [25626813]
  • Turkish delight (diced cartilage in Surgicel) across 9,398 primary and secondary rhinoplasties over 25 years: no late show at 4 to 25 years; Level IV [26818276]
  • Microautologous fat transplantation for primary augmentation in 198 Asian patients (mean age 45.5; 3.4 mL per session, 1-3 sessions; mean follow-up 19 months): satisfied 63.1%; no major complications [26764261]
  • Folded cymba concha as caudal septal extension graft, 311 harvests and 220 patients at 12 months or more: mean length 24.2 mm (men) and 22.4 mm (women), width 7.8 and 7.2 mm; projection +28.9%, columellar-labial angle +9.7%; no difference from septal cartilage (P=0.264, P=0.182) [33564830]
  • Septal extension vs derotation graft in 729 Asian tip-plasties: projection equal; SEG more tip-columella deviation (5.23% vs 1.41%), DRG more drooping (8.45% vs 4.53%) and supratip deformity (2.82% vs 0%) [39965161]
  • Lateral crural strut graft for post-implant tip deformities in 37 Asian secondary cases: ROE 30.41 to 75.90 (P<0.001); 2 asymmetric nostril/tip, 1 visible graft [40920505]
  • Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in 40 severely contracted Asian noses (randomized against saline): at 18 months length 4.2 to 5.1 cm, projection 2.2 to 2.9 cm, nasolabial angle 105.8 to 94.9 degrees, gains larger than control; Level III [33620926]
  • Post-augmentation nasal deviation with CT-proven bony asymmetry, 15 Asian women: 14 developmental keystone asymmetry, 1 osteotomy-induced; paramedian osteotomy with unilateral extended spreader graft succeeded in 13, 2 needed further surgery [29394321]
  • Combined sill and alar excision in 73 Asian patients: interalar-to-intercanthal ratio 1.07 to 1.04 (P<.001); flaring resolved in 45 of 60 (75%); nostril symmetry 52% to 63%; pear-shaped nostrils 27% to 48%; complications 4 (5%) [27441889]
  • Trans-areola costal cartilage harvest in 26 Asian women vs 35 chest-wall harvests: longer surgery and pneumothorax 7.7% vs 2.9%, but better scar quality and higher satisfaction; significant scar 7.7%, breast concavity 3.8%, chest pain 3.8% [31960891]
  • Asian cleft rhinoplasty, open structural with septocolumellar graft, extended spreaders, lateral crural steal, lateral crural strut graft and diced cartilage in temporal fascia, 35 patients (29 unilateral), mean follow-up 23 months: low complications and revisions; Level 4 [29149246]
  • Dorsal preservation in Asian hump noses: 17 patients at median 36.9 months with no residual or recurrent hump, NOSE 61.00 to 15.50, SCHNOS 10.90; an earlier 9-patient open series needed bony step-off camouflage in 3 [39056121, 36988641]
  • Closed preservation in 417 mestizo primaries with four tip-support technique types: revision 1.7% at 6-12 months; 79.3% female, median age 23 [39876773]
  • Caucasian hump on CT, 67 hump patients vs 67 controls: hump 17 mm long and 1.8 mm high; apex above the septal cartilage in every patient; kyphion under the hump in all; hump began caudal to the ethmoidal point in 97% [34270513]

Techniques and terms named

ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty [40906288], Asian nose Types I-IV [39529302], anatomic (non-ethnic) classification [39142701], Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire / DSM-V [40907540], nonsurgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid filler [37344935], cannula-based sequential injection, high-G' hyaluronic acid, fibrous septal deposition, tip-dorsum-glabella protocol [42443422], septal extension graft [41990353], derotation graft [41990353], columellar strut [41990353], auricular cartilage framework / diced auricular cartilage dorsum [41411306], closed approach [41411306], Supratip Fullness Rating Scale [37798507], fascia graft — postauricular or rectus abdominis [41813990], nasolabial angle management [40494973], FACE-Q [42443422], ROE [37798507], 3D facial scanning (MVS-N1) [42443422], MINORS scale [40494973], Newcastle-Ottawa / AHRQ [40906288], Deep Surface AI morphing [42153758], cadaveric structural grafts [42153758], infection risk factors in East Asian rhinoplasty [35511054], columellar scar types [26822626], autologous onlay resorption (mastoid fascia, sacral dermis, diced cartilage) [35077410], molded glued diced cartilage graft [35877941], 3D-printed customized silicone implant [42154478], chimeric dorsal-glabellar construct [26879296], elevated radix deformity [26879296], subdorsal cantilever graft types A and B [35724256], dual-plane diced cartilage [40493956], crushed cartilage with fibrin sealant [25626813], Turkish delight [26818276], microautologous fat transplantation (MAFT) [26764261], folded cymba concha caudal septal extension [33564830], derotation graft [39965161], lateral crural strut graft [40920505], adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction [33620926], paramedian osteotomy with extended spreader graft [29394321], combined sill and alar excision [27441889], trans-areola rib harvest [31960891], septocolumellar graft in Asian cleft rhinoplasty [29149246], push-down and let-down in Asian noses [36988641], mestizo tip support types I-IV [39876773], kyphion and ethmoidal point [34270513]

Numbers to remember

  • Satisfaction SMD 0.68; complications 8.7% vs 17.4%; revisions 5.3% vs 12.1% [40906288]
  • BDD prevalence 30.0% in Asian rhinoplasty candidates, n=1,977 [40907540]
  • Dorsal hump in 91% and septal deviation in 85% of 100 Middle Eastern primaries [40855021]
  • 487 African-descent filler patients; median 0.6 mL; 0 vascular events [37344935]
  • Kappa 0.933 for the 4-type Asian nose classification [39529302]
  • 528 East Asian filler patients; tip projection +3.69 mm at 9 months [42443422]
  • Revisions 8% with AI morphing vs 19% without, 392 vs 392 African American patients [42153758]
  • Infection 0.84% of 2,630 East Asian rhinoplasties; 3.63% in revisions, 0.19% in primaries [35511054]
  • Problematic columellar scar 6.0% of 234 Asian open rhinoplasties [26822626]
  • Molded diced cartilage: 82.5% satisfied, 23.8% complications, 10% revision in 80 Asian patients [35877941]
  • At least 50% long-term resorption of autologous dorsal onlays in East Asian noses [35077410]
  • MAFT satisfaction 63.1% of 198; cymba concha SEG projection +28.9% in 220 [26764261, 33564830]

Numbers

Measure Value Population / study PMID
Revision rate, ethnicity-conscious vs conventional 5.3% vs 12.1% 17 comparative studies, meta-analysis [40906288]
Revision rate, African American rhinoplasty with vs without AI morphing 8% vs 19% 392 vs 392 patients [42153758]
Revision rate, Asian short nose by technique 6.5% SEG+DG vs 10.6% SEG vs 14.3% DG+strut 324 patients [41990353]
Revision rate, molded glued diced cartilage dorsum 10% (8/80) 80 Asian patients [35877941]
Revision rate, closed preservation in mestizo noses 1.7% (7/417) 417 primaries [39876773]
Complication rate, ethnicity-conscious vs conventional 8.7% vs 17.4% 17 comparative studies [40906288]
Complication rate, African American rhinoplasty 2% vs 3% 392 vs 392 patients [42153758]
Infection, East Asian rhinoplasty 0.84% overall; 3.63% revision vs 0.19% primary 2,630 cases, 16 years [35511054]
Infection with autologous costal cartilage (East Asian) 3.39% 413 cases [35511054]
Infection with simultaneous septal perforation repair 8.57% Subset of 2,630 [35511054]
Problematic columellar scar, Asian open rhinoplasty 6.0% (14/234) 234 patients at 6 months [26822626]
Complications, molded glued diced cartilage 23.8% (19/80) 80 patients [35877941]
Complications, combined sill and alar excision 5% (4/73) 73 Asian patients [27441889]
Pneumothorax, trans-areola vs chest-wall rib harvest 7.7% vs 2.9% 26 vs 35 women [31960891]
Complications, dual-plane diced cartilage 0 of 54 54 ethnic primaries [40493956]
Resorption, crushed cartilage with fibrin sealant 2.0%; visibility 3.9% 51 Asian radix augmentations [25626813]
Long-term resorption, autologous dorsal onlays 50% or more in almost all groups East Asian cohort 2009-2018 [35077410]
Vascular events, filler rhinoplasty in African-descent patients 0 of 487 487 patients [37344935]
Satisfaction SMD, ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty 0.68 (0.63-0.73) 17 studies [40906288]
Satisfaction, molded glued diced cartilage 82.5% 80 patients [35877941]
Satisfaction, microautologous fat augmentation 63.1% 198 patients [26764261]
Satisfaction, systematic Asian rhinoplasty approach 86% 110 cases [25028852]
Excellent or good outcome, crushed cartilage radix 78.5% (41.2% + 37.3%) 51 patients [25626813]
ROE, lateral crural strut graft 30.41 to 75.90 37 Asian secondary cases [40920505]
ROE satisfaction, Asian pollybeak correction 77.36% 53 patients [37798507]
FACE-Q satisfaction change, East Asian filler protocol +44.4 426 patients at 9 months [42443422]
Body dysmorphic disorder prevalence, Asian candidates 30.0% (26.8-35.7) 15 studies, 1,977 patients [40907540]

What is still contested or missing

  • BDD prevalence halves depending on tool: 36% by questionnaire vs 18% by DSM-V; standardized diagnostic protocols lacking [40907540]
  • "Ethnic" categories may misrepresent anatomy; anatomic typing proposed as replacement [39142701]
  • Caucasian patients showed the lowest satisfaction gain (SMD 0.21) in a meta-analysis of tailored vs conventional approaches [40906288]
  • Commentaries [39142700, 38923925, 25028853] are title-only on file [39142700, 38923925, 25028853]
  • AI-morphing cohorts were sequential, not randomized, and the revision gap (8% vs 19%) may reflect period effects [42153758]
  • Autologous onlay resorption of 50% or more conflicts with 3D-scan data showing no height loss between 3 months and 1 year for molded diced cartilage; follow-up lengths differ [35077410, 35877941]
  • 3D-printed implant comparison reports no sample size, follow-up or complication data in the abstract [42154478]
  • Trans-areola harvest trades scar quality for a higher pneumothorax rate in a 61-woman comparison [31960891]
  • Infection risk factors come from one surgeon's 2,630 cases with 69.9% men, a sex mix unlike most Western series [35511054]

Papers used

  • Hashemipour Y, Danesh HA. Ethnic Considerations in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in Caucasian Versus Non-Caucasian Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40906288. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05189-w
  • Chua NYM et al.. The Mirror of Culture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Asian Rhinoplasty Seekers. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40907540. DOI 10.1055/a-2689-1653
  • Reid D et al.. Ethnic Variations and Surgical Outcomes in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 40494973. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-04939-0
  • Ng CL. A Classification System of Asian Noses for Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2025. PMID 39529302. DOI 10.1055/a-2442-7493
  • Hall DB et al.. Bringing Inclusivity to "Ethnic" Rhinoplasty: A Novel Anatomical Classification System. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2025. PMID 39142701. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0366
  • Barrera JE, Gasic K. Invited Commentary on: "Bringing Inclusivity to 'Ethnic' Rhinoplasty: A Novel Anatomical Classification System," by Hall et al. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2025. PMID 39142700. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0214 (title only)
  • Wang X et al.. A New Classification of Pollybeak Deformity and Its Treatment in Asian Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 37798507. DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03695-3
  • Yu AY. Discussion: Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty in Patients of African Descent: A Retrospective Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 38923925. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011348 (title only)
  • Harb A, Abdul-Razzak A. Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty in Patients of African Descent: A Retrospective Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37344935. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010881
  • Guyuron B. Discussion: individualized asian rhinoplasty: a systematic approach to facial balance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014. PMID 25028853. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000255 (title only)
  • Li Z et al.. Individualized Asian rhinoplasty: a systematic approach to facial balance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014. PMID 25028852. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000294
  • Gu Q et al.. Asian Rhinoplasty Using Exclusively Auricular Cartilage Through a Closed Approach. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41411306. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf266
  • Huang CJ et al.. Efficacy of Combined Septal Extension and Derotation Grafts in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Tip Projection and Stability. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41990353. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag079
  • Ye J et al.. A Cannula-Based Sequential Injection Protocol for Non-surgical Rhinoplasty in East Asian Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42443422. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-06110-9
  • Zhao H et al.. Autologous Fascial Grafting for Alar Base Depression: A Novel Technique in Asian Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41813990. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05789-0
  • Rahimian H, Sajjadian A. Middle Eastern Rhinoplasty: Balancing Form, Function, and Ethnic Harmony. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40855021. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05171-6
  • Albert J et al.. "Ethnic Preferences in African American Rhinoplasty using Artificial Intelligence Morphing and Cadaveric Structural Cartilage Grafts". Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 42153758. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013198
  • Tran KN, Jang YJ. Incidence and Predisposing Factors of Postoperative Infection after Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon's 16-Year Experience with 2630 Cases in an East Asian Population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022. PMID 35511054. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009202
  • Kim HC, Jang YJ. Columellar Incision Scars in Asian Patients Undergoing Open Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 26822626. DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2178
  • Lee TY et al.. Long-Term Resorption Rate of Autogenous Onlay Graft in East Asian Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022. PMID 35077410. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008793
  • Yoo SH et al.. Dorsal Augmentation Using a Glued Diced Cartilage Graft Fashioned with a Newly Developed Mold in Asian Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022. PMID 35877941. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009568
  • Kim TK et al.. Comparison of Customized and Prefabricated Silicone Implants in Asian Rhinoplasty Using 3D Technology. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 42154478. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013208
  • Zelken JA et al.. Preventing Elevated Radix Deformity in Asian Rhinoplasty with a Chimeric Dorsal-Glabellar Construct. Aesthet Surg J 2016. PMID 26879296. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjv218
  • Toriumi DM. Subdorsal Cantilever Graft for Elevating the Dorsum in Ethnic Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022. PMID 35724256. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0117
  • Ok B, Duran A. The Dual-Plane Diced Cartilage Concept for Nasal Augmentation in Ethnic Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 40493956. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012249
  • Yu MS et al.. Combined use of crushed cartilage and fibrin sealant for radix augmentation in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015. PMID 25626813. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001114
  • Erol OO. Long-Term Results and Refinement of the Turkish Delight Technique for Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty: 25 Years of Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016. PMID 26818276. DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000475755.71333.bf
  • Kao WP et al.. Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2016. PMID 26764261. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjv253
  • Namgoong S et al.. Folded Cymba Concha: Is It Large and Stable Enough for Caudal Septal Extension Graft in Asian Rhinoplasty?. Aesthet Surg J 2021. PMID 33564830. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab079
  • Namgoong S et al.. A Comparative Study of Septal Extension Graft versus Derotation Graft for Short Nose Correction in Asian Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39965161. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012022
  • Kook WS et al.. Versatile Usability of Lateral Crural Strut Graft for Correction of Various Nasal Tip Deformities in Secondary Rhinoplasty in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40920505. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012423
  • Ahn TH et al.. Use of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions in Revision Rhinoplasty for Severe Contractures in Asian Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021. PMID 33620926. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007623
  • Lee PC et al.. Treatment of Nasal Deviation With Underlying Bony Asymmetry Secondary to Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asian Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2018. PMID 29394321. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjy006
  • Kim JH et al.. Aesthetic Outcomes of Alar Base Resection in Asian Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 27441889. DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0800
  • Zhao R et al.. Application of Trans-Areola Approach for Costal Cartilage Harvest in Asian Rhinoplasty and Comparison with Traditional Approach on Donor-Site Morbidity. Aesthet Surg J 2020. PMID 31960891. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa012
  • Wong CH et al.. Asian Cleft Rhinoplasty: The Open Structural Approach. Aesthet Surg J 2017. PMID 29149246. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjx197
  • Jin HR, Jeon YJ. Feasibility of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty for Hump Nose Reduction in Asian Population. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 39056121. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0055
  • Jin HR et al.. Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty in Asian Hump Noses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 36988641. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010472
  • Valdivia C et al.. Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip Support. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 39876773. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf017
  • Rodrigues Dias D et al.. The Caucasian Hump: Radiologic Study of the Osteocartilaginous Vault versus Surface Anatomy. Clinical Implications in Structured and Preservation Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021. PMID 34270513. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008213

Written by rhinoplasty.cc, 2026-09-08, from the PubMed abstracts; not medical advice.

Start here

The 40 papers the synthesis above was written from.

  1. APS
    2026PMID 40906288Summary
  2. FPS
    2026PMID 40907540Summary
  3. APS
    2025PMID 40494973Summary
  4. FPS
    2025PMID 39529302Summary
  5. FPSAM
    2025PMID 39142701Summary
  6. FPSAM
    2025PMID 39142700
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37798507Summary
  8. PRS
    2024PMID 38923925
  9. PRS
    2024PMID 37344935Summary
  10. PRS
    2014PMID 25028853
  11. PRS
    2014PMID 25028852Summary
  12. ASJ
    2026PMID 41411306Summary
  13. ASJ
    2026PMID 41990353Summary
  14. APS
    2026PMID 42443422Summary
  15. APS
    2026PMID 41813990Summary
  16. APS
    2026PMID 40855021Summary
  17. PRS
    2026PMID 42153758Summary
  18. PRS
    2022PMID 35511054Summary
  19. JAMA FPS
    2016PMID 26822626Summary
  20. PRS
    2022PMID 35077410Summary
  21. PRS
    2022PMID 35877941Summary
  22. PRS
    2026PMID 42154478Summary
  23. ASJ
    2016PMID 26879296Summary
  24. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35724256Summary
  25. PRS
    2025PMID 40493956Summary
  26. PRS
    2015PMID 25626813Summary
  27. PRS
    2016PMID 26818276Summary
  28. ASJ
    2016PMID 26764261Summary
  29. ASJ
    2021PMID 33564830Summary
  30. PRS
    2025PMID 39965161Summary
  31. PRS
    2026PMID 40920505Summary
  32. PRS
    2021PMID 33620926Summary
  33. ASJ
    2018PMID 29394321Summary
  34. JAMA FPS
    2016PMID 27441889Summary
  35. ASJ
    2020PMID 31960891Summary
  36. ASJ
    2017PMID 29149246Summary
  37. FPSAM
    2024PMID 39056121Summary
  38. PRS
    2024PMID 36988641Summary
  39. ASJ
    2025PMID 39876773Summary
  40. PRS
    2021PMID 34270513Summary

Related topics

Every paper, by year

167 papers. The 40 Start here papers are not repeated.

202614 papers · 10 above
  1. APS
    PMID 42303768Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 40775193Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 41962580Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 41145129Summary
202522 papers · 7 above
  1. APS
    PMID 40055225
  2. APS
    PMID 40699341
  3. APS
    PMID 39516419Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 39322839Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 37962627
  6. APS
    PMID 37831159
  7. APS
    PMID 40646255Summary
  8. APS
    PMID 40456990Summary
  9. APS
    PMID 39433615Summary
  10. FPS
    Asian Augmentation Rhinoplasty
    Frederick JW, Yoo DB
    PMID 40389234Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 38599617Summary
  12. FPS
    PMID 38547925Summary
  13. FPS
    PMID 39447621Summary
  14. PRS-GO
    PMID 40642259Summary
  15. PRS-GO
    PMID 40995575Summary
202412 papers · 5 above
  1. APS
    PMID 37749417Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 37580565Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 38839614Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 38233685Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 38443745Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    PMID 38936994Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 39444535Summary
202310 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 35606536Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 35794245
  3. APS
    PMID 36510019
  4. APS
    PMID 36042025Summary
  5. CPS
    PMID 36396252Summary
  6. CPS
    PMID 36396253Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 37279876Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 36791802Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 37197013Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 37124386Summary
202220 papers · 4 above
  1. APS
    PMID 35577970Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 34498142Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 35817877Full text
  4. APS
    PMID 35475936
  5. APS
    PMID 34231023
  6. APS
    PMID 34254162
  7. APS
    PMID 35449422Summary
  8. CPS
    PMID 34782133Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 34428809
  10. FPS
    PMID 34161991Summary
  11. FPS Clin
    PMID 39492207Summary
  12. FPS Clin
    PMID 39492208Summary
  13. FPS Clin
    PMID 39492206Summary
  14. FPS Clin
    PMID 39492209Summary
  15. PRS
    PMID 34936638
  16. PRS
    PMID 34855703
202116 papers · 3 above
  1. APS
    PMID 33432387Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 32322931Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 34085104Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 32914325Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 32880669
  6. APS
    PMID 32926185
  7. APS
    PMID 33855581Full text
  8. APS
    PMID 32100083Summary
  9. APS
    PMID 33758974Summary
  10. FPSAM
    PMID 33691466
  11. FPS Clin
    Approach for Rhinoplasty in African Descendants
    Patrocinio LG, Patrocinio TG, Patrocinio JA
    PMID 34579839Summary
  12. FPS Clin
    PMID 34579840Summary
  13. FPS Clin
    PMID 34579841Summary
20206 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 32304572
  2. APS
    PMID 31834523Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 31897626
  4. FPS
    PMID 33368077Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 32191958Summary
20193 papers
  1. FPS
    PMID 30388718Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 31470460Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 30601313
20188 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 29788068
  2. APS
    PMID 29273934Summary
  3. FPS Clin
    PMID 30005784Summary
  4. FPS Clin
    PMID 30005794Summary
  5. FPS Clin
    PMID 30005789Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    PMID 30078396
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 30656100Summary
20173 papers · 1 above
  1. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28384793
  2. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28384783
201614 papers · 5 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 27095313Full text
  2. APS
    PMID 26893278Summary
  3. CPS
    PMID 26616711Summary
  4. CPS
    PMID 26616714Summary
  5. CPS
    PMID 26616712Summary
  6. CPS
    PMID 26616713Summary
  7. FPS
    An Economical Approach to Ethnic Asian Rhinoplasty
    Zelken J, Chang CS, Chuang SS et al.
    PMID 26862970Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 27494583Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 28033636Summary
20155 papers · 1 above
  1. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26066901Summary
  2. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26111006Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 25811570Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 25626814
201415 papers · 2 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 25158684Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 25028110
  3. APS
    PMID 24879039Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 24788856Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 24810123Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 25076457Summary
  7. FPS Clin
    African American rhinoplasty
    Boyette JR, Stucker FJ
    PMID 25049123Summary
  8. FPS Clin
    PMID 25049122Summary
  9. FPS Clin
    PMID 25049124Summary
  10. FPS Clin
    PMID 25049121Summary
  11. PRS
    PMID 25054248Summary
  12. PRS-GO
    PMID 25289326Summary
  13. PRS-GO
    PMID 25289365Summary
20135 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 23636623Summary
  2. ASJ
    PMID 23395883Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 23761120Summary
  4. FPS
    Rhinoplasty across Latin America: case discussions
    Cobo R, Montes JJ, Patrocinio LG et al.
    PMID 23761123Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 23761121Summary
201210 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 23110932Summary
  2. ASJ
    PMID 22738757Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 22890858Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 21993575Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 22350307Summary
  6. Arch FPS
    PMID 22801762Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 23190818
  8. PRS
    PMID 22374001Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 22418718Summary
  10. PRS
    PMID 23190817Summary
20114 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 21491168Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 21487908Summary
  3. APS
    Treatment protocol for "Mestizo nose" with open rhinoplasty
    de la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF
    PMID 21533985Summary
  4. Arch FPS
    PMID 21768557Summary