rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2020

ASJ Aesthetic Surgery Journal · 2020

Application of Trans-Areola Approach for Costal Cartilage Harvest in Asian Rhinoplasty and Comparison with Traditional Approach on Donor-Site Morbidity

Zhao R, Pan B, Lin H, Long Y, An Y, Ke Q.

What this paper says

Comparing 26 women whose rib cartilage was harvested through the nipple areola against 35 harvested through a chest incision, the areola route gave better scar quality and higher satisfaction but longer surgery and more pneumothorax, 7.7 versus 2.9 percent.

Overview

Harvesting rib cartilage through a chest wall incision leaves a visible scar, which is the main deterrent for Asian women considering rhinoplasty with their own rib. This study evaluated harvesting through an incision at the edge of the areola instead, and compared donor site outcomes with the conventional route.

Sections of note

  • Patient records were reviewed to identify which harvest approach was used.
  • Donor site outcome was evaluated 1 year after surgery using a visual analogue scale and the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale.
  • Long-term complications in the trans-areola group were assessed at least 6 months after surgery.
  • 26 females in the trans-areola group and 35 in the traditional group, of similar age and body mass index range.
  • The trans-areola group had significantly longer surgery time.
  • Pneumothorax rate 7.7 percent trans-areola versus 2.9 percent traditional.
  • Trans-areola gave significantly better scar quality and higher overall satisfaction; its long-term complications were significant scars in 2 of 26 (7.7%), breast concavity in 1 (3.8%), and local chest pain or discomfort in 1 (3.8%).

What it means for a patient

  • The areola route hides the scar but roughly doubled the rate of air leaking into the chest cavity, from 2.9 to 7.7 percent.
  • One patient developed a dent in the breast where the cartilage was taken.
  • Surgery took longer with the areola approach.
  • Limits: 26 and 35 patients, retrospective, not randomized, one center, and only women.

Why this paper matters

Donor site scarring drives many patients toward synthetic implants instead of their own cartilage, so hiding the scar changes that calculation. The trade-off reported here is a higher pneumothorax rate. Whether that trade is acceptable depends on how the risk is presented and how reliably it is managed.

Terms

  • Trans-areola approach: Harvesting through an incision at the edge of the nipple areola.
  • Costal cartilage: Rib cartilage, used as a graft source.
  • Donor-site morbidity: Problems caused at the place a graft was taken from.
  • Pneumothorax: Air leaking into the space around the lung, causing partial collapse.
  • Modified Vancouver Scar Scale: A validated scale rating scar appearance and quality.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The traditional approach of harvesting costal cartilage through a chest wall incision can result in significant donor-site morbidity and usually causes notable scars in Asian patients. This has become the main concern for Asian females seeking rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Objectives: The aim of this…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Year
2020
Authors
6
Type
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2020.

  1. ASJ
    2020PMID 31957807Summary
  2. ASJ
    2020PMID 32304572
  3. ASJ
    2020PMID 31886850
  4. ASJ
    2020PMID 31675056
  5. ASJ
    2020PMID 30868159Summary
  6. APS
    2020PMID 32936331
  7. APS
    2020PMID 31834523Summary
  8. APS
    2020PMID 31897626