rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · by topic

Septum, valve and airway

195 papers with rhinoplasty in the title matching this topic, 2011 to 2026.

195
Papers
40
Start here
150
Abstracts on file
45
Open access
10
Journals
2011
First year
2026
Latest year
150
Summaries written
APS53PRS39FPS32FPSAM18ASJ15PRS-GO15JAMA FPS10FPS Clin8Arch FPS4CPS1
220116201222013220146201592016152017132018102019122020182021122022202023222024172025292026

What the literature says

Synthesised from the abstracts of the 40 papers listed under Start here. Every line carries the PubMed ID it rests on.

Two-sentence lead. Functional rhinoplasty that corrects the septum and nasal valves lowers obstruction scores by roughly 40-50 NOSE points, and the gain holds at 12 months; endonasal septal extension grafting alone cut NOSE by 49.4 points in a 34-patient pilot. Preservation and structural techniques breathe equally well (randomized trial of 84 patients: SCHNOS P=.90), spreader graft versus spreader flap shows no measured functional difference, and NOSE and SCHNOS-O scores can now be converted with a validated crosswalk.

Key points

  • Functional rhinoplasty meta-analysis, 43 studies / 57 cohorts (n=2024): NOSE improvement WMD 38.12 at 1 month, 48.40 at 3 months, 44.35 at 6 months, 43.07 at 12 months, 46.90 at last follow-up; rhinomanometry improved (SMD 0.56, I2=0%); peak nasal inspiratory flow not significant (SMD -1.51, P=0.09) [35099579]
  • VAS obstruction in the same pooled data: WMD 4.68 at 1 month, 4.46 at 3, 4.91 at 6, 4.22 at last follow-up [35099579]
  • Quality-of-life meta-analysis, 16 studies (n=971): functional rhinoplasty reduced NOSE, SNOT-22, and VAS obstruction and raised ROE [37173413]
  • Sleep-disordered breathing, 8 studies / 27 cohorts (n=1,192): NOSE SMD -4.99 (-9.12 to -0.85); Epworth SMD -1.09 (-2.33 to 0.15); PSQI SMD -0.74 (-1.21 to -0.26); FOSQ-10 SMD 0.41 (0.16-0.65) [42314704]
  • Obstruction sites from 135 studies: external valve, septum, inferior turbinates, internal valve, nasal bones; pitfalls are ignoring the bony septum, over-resecting turbinates, and narrowing the bony vault with osteotomies [32328743]
  • Preservation vs structural functional outcomes, 22 studies (n=2,058): no difference in controlled studies; both improve NOSE, SCHNOS-O, VAS-F, SNOT-22, or rhinometry [42532128]
  • Spreader graft vs spreader flap, 10 articles (n=567): no difference in internal valve angle, NOSE, or anterior rhinomanometry [34864854]
  • Crooked-nose septal deviations typed C, reverse-C, I, and S; septoplasty Types 1-4; swinging door keeps the quadrangular cartilage intact vs classical L-strut [36826521]
  • Subdorsal strip DPR, MSSM vs Z flap (n=71): NOSE 9.36 baseline, change -4.4 (p<0.001); SNOT-22 23.9, change -16.4; ESS 6.2, change -1.6; no difference between strip methods [38648529]
  • Endonasal septal extension graft, 60 patients at 1 year: nasolabial angle 93.75° ± 9.45° to 101.1° ± 5.3°; Crumley ratio 3.84 to 4.04 (P<0.001) [35554489]
  • Septal extension graft vs columellar strut meta-analysis (256 CSG, 371 SEG): long-term nasolabial angle favored SEG [40854551]
  • Lateral crura algorithm, 50 patients: NOSE improved; 90% reported functional and aesthetic gain; 4% revision [42624495]
  • Nasal packing review, 30 of 62 articles (2000-2023): limited benefit for bleeding, edema, or ecchymosis; splints give similar advantages [38485786]
  • Randomized trial, 84 patients: hump resection with spreader flaps vs dorsal preservation with modified subdorsal strip showed no difference in SCHNOS (P=.90) or VAS (P=.81) at 1 year [38366551]
  • Blinded raters, 78 participants: ROE and SCHNOS obstruction composites comparable between preservation and structural cohorts; approach identified correctly 52.9% of the time [40331571]
  • Endonasal septal extension graft with septoplasty and turbinate reduction in 34 obstructed patients (52.9% male, median age 38.3): NOSE 71.5, change -49.4; SNOT-22 35.4, change -24.2; ESS 6.7, change -3.4; SCHNOS functional 67.9, change -44.5 (all p<0.001); no complications; mean follow-up 126.6 days [38350156]
  • Let-down dorsal preservation with MSSM or Z-flap, 52 patients aged 15-69: NOSE, SNOT-22 and SCHNOS improved at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months; Epworth improved to 3 months only; no difference between septal techniques [36282789]
  • Prophylactic autospreader flaps in cosmetic primaries: NOSE and VAS worsened at 1 month and returned to preoperative values by 1 year (p=0.0003, p=0.0012); keystone width fell and held; net dorsal widening 1 mm, not significant [42415377]
  • NOSE to SCHNOS-O crosswalk by Rasch analysis in 552 patients, validated in a second sample: intraclass correlation 0.93 in both directions; SCHNOS-O predicted slightly higher than NOSE at moderate obstruction [38551458]
  • Fresh frozen homologous costal cartilage in 123 primary, revision and functional cases: NOSE -7.9, SNOT-22 -18.9, Epworth -4.8, SCHNOS functional -5.1 (all P<0.001); infection 2.4%, resorption 0.8% [40674713]
  • Functional rhinoplasty by graft source, 259 patients: revision 12.1% with fresh frozen cadaveric rib vs 4.0% autologous (OR 4.0, p=0.024); persistent obstruction without surgery 6.6%; infection 4.6%, not different by source [40147429]
  • Caudal septal extension graft laterality, 122 septorhinoplasties at 1 year (mean follow-up 18 months): side of placement did not change rated tip symmetry on any view; a midline straight septum drives symmetry [40875573]
  • Septal extension vs derotation graft in 729 Asian tip-plasties: projection equal (Goode P=0.954); SEG more tip-columella deviation (5.23% vs 1.41%), DRG more drooping (8.45% vs 4.53%) and supratip deformity (2.82% vs 0%); Level III [39965161]
  • Combined SEG plus derotation graft in 324 Asian short noses: revision 6.5% vs 10.6% (SEG only) vs 14.3% (derotation plus strut); most stable length and projection (P<.001) [41990353]
  • Combined septal extension-columellar strut graft, 32 primaries (31.3% functional): NOSE 34.4 to 4.84 (p<0.001); no revisions at mean 13.4 months [39187271]
  • Septal extension graft complex (septal cartilage, ethmoid plate spreaders, double auricular strut) in 25 short-nose East Asians: length +4.8 mm, projection +3.1 mm; tip resistance rose at 1-3 mm displacement [35786707]
  • Perpendicular plate of ethmoid split technique, 36 patients (22 septoplasty, 14 rhinoplasty), mean plate thickness 3.46 mm on CT: bony batten grafts harvested in 26, spur removal or reshaping in 10; graft breakage in 3 [39138596]
  • Modified low septal strip with fixation in 231 closed DPR primaries: complications 3.5%; the modification lowered complications (P=0.012) and hump recurrence (P=0.029) [39023572]
  • Spare roof technique B3 adds a low septal cartilage strip for tension noses with caudal septal deviation, treating moderate axis deviation within a surface preservation technique [39087910]
  • Transecting Pitanguy's midline ligament in closed low-strip DPR, 36 patients: supratip depression 0 of 20 vs 4 of 16 (P<0.05); ROE equal [35908175]
  • Septal perforation repair with the bone-cartilage unit during rhinoplasty, 31 patients (perforation 6-27 mm, mean 14.1): complete closure 83.8% (26), incomplete 3, reperforation 2; SCHNOS-O -31.93, SCHNOS-C -44.19 at 1 year or more [38648541]
  • Septal perforation repair with pedicled anterior ethmoidal and greater palatine artery flaps under a preserved dorsum, 2 cases aged 62 and 65: racket-on-donut and boot-on-donut variants covered grafts bilaterally [41071182]
  • Primary septal cartilage rim graft in 60 unilateral cleft patients at 10 years (23 grafted): smaller and shorter septal deviation (P<0.001); higher medial nostril height (P=0.031) [41100821]
  • Septal repositioning during intermediate cleft rhinoplasty at age 5-6, 77 patients followed to age 9.28: caudal septal deviation angle and nostril width ratio improved at both follow-ups; Level III [37467053]
  • Secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with septal extension graft, 194 skeletally mature patients: projection, bridge length, dorsum and columellar angles increased; deviation and alar width decreased; nose still differed from matched controls [37797231]
  • Nasal valve compromise practice survey, 113 of 580 meeting participants: general concordance with the 2010 clinical consensus statement; under 10% discordant; disagreement on imaging, rhinoscopy, endoscopy and acoustic rhinomanometry varied by specialty, years in practice, setting and volume [34495760]
  • Remote nasal examination with patient-held endoscope and webcam, 20 subjects: kappa 0.66 virtual vs 0.78 in person; only the internal valve and inferior turbinate were better seen in person; recommendation score 8.65 of 10 [37358622]

Techniques and terms named

septoplasty [35099579], turbinate reduction / mucosal-sparing turbinectomy [32328743], spreader graft [34864854], spreader flap [34864854], lateral wall support [32328743], alar rim graft [32328743], septal extension graft [35554489], columellar strut [40854551], swinging door [36826521], L-strut [36826521], MSSM / Z flap [38648529], nasal packing / nasal splints [38485786], tranexamic acid / steroids [38485786], NOSE [35099579], SNOT-22 [37173413], SCHNOS [38648529], VAS obstruction [35099579], rhinomanometry [35099579], peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) [35099579], Epworth Sleepiness Scale [42314704], PSQI [42314704], FOSQ-10 [42314704], ESS [38648529], Crumley ratio [35554489], internal nasal valve angle [34864854], modified subdorsal strip and spreader flap [38366551], endonasal septal extension graft [38350156], subdorsal Z-flap [36282789], prophylactic autospreader flap [42415377], NOSE-SCHNOS-O crosswalk (Rasch) [38551458], fresh frozen homologous costal cartilage [40674713], fresh frozen cadaveric rib in functional rhinoplasty [40147429], caudal septal extension graft laterality [40875573], derotation graft [39965161], SEG plus derotation graft [41990353], combined septal extension-columellar strut graft [39187271], ethmoid plate spreader grafts [35786707], perpendicular plate of ethmoid split [39138596], septal batten graft [39138596], modified low septal strip [39023572], spare roof technique B3 [39087910], Pitanguy midline ligament transection [35908175], bone-cartilage unit for perforation [38648541], anterior ethmoidal and greater palatine artery flaps [41071182], primary septal rim graft in cleft [41100821], septal repositioning in intermediate cleft rhinoplasty [37467053], 2010 nasal valve consensus statement [34495760], remote nasal endoscopy [37358622]

Numbers to remember

  • NOSE WMD 46.90 at last follow-up across 57 cohorts, n=2024 [35099579]
  • n=1,192 with sleep-disordered breathing: NOSE SMD -4.99, PSQI SMD -0.74 [42314704]
  • n=2,058: no functional difference preservation vs structural [42532128]
  • n=567: spreader graft vs flap functionally equal [34864854]
  • Nasolabial angle 101.1° ± 5.3° after endonasal SEG, n=60 [35554489]
  • 135 studies reviewed on obstruction sites and treatments [32328743]
  • NOSE change -49.4 after endonasal SEG with septoplasty and turbinoplasty, n=34 [38350156]
  • RCT n=84: SCHNOS P=.90 between preservation and hump resection at 1 year [38366551]
  • Crosswalk ICC 0.93 between NOSE and SCHNOS-O, n=552 [38551458]
  • Revision 12.1% cadaveric rib vs 4.0% autologous in 259 functional cases [40147429]
  • Septal perforation closure 83.8% of 31 with the bone-cartilage unit [38648541]

Numbers

Measure Value Population / study PMID
Revision rate, functional rhinoplasty by graft source 12.1% cadaveric rib vs 4.0% autologous (OR 4.0) 259 patients, mean 12.3 months [40147429]
Revision rate, Asian short nose by technique 6.5% SEG+DG vs 10.6% SEG vs 14.3% DG+strut 324 patients [41990353]
Revision rate, lateral crura algorithm 4% 50 patients [42624495]
Revisions, combined SEG-strut graft 0 of 32 32 primaries, 13.4 months [39187271]
Persistent obstruction without revision 6.6% 259 functional rhinoplasties [40147429]
Infection, functional rhinoplasty 4.6% (12/259) 259 patients [40147429]
Infection and resorption, FFHCC 2.4% and 0.8% 123 cases [40674713]
Complications, endonasal SEG pilot 0 of 34 34 patients [38350156]
Complications, modified low septal strip DPR 3.5% (8/231) 231 primaries [39023572]
Tip-columella deviation, SEG vs DRG 5.23% vs 1.41% 729 Asian tip-plasties [39965161]
Septal perforation closure, bone-cartilage unit 83.8% complete; 2 reperforations 31 patients, perforation mean 14.1 mm [38648541]
Ethmoid plate graft breakage 3 of 36 36 patients [39138596]
NOSE improvement, pooled functional rhinoplasty WMD 43.07 at 12 months; 46.90 at last follow-up 57 cohorts, 2,024 patients [35099579]
NOSE change, endonasal SEG 71.5 baseline, -49.4 34 patients [38350156]
NOSE change, combined SEG-strut graft 34.4 to 4.84 32 primaries [39187271]
NOSE change, FFHCC series -7.9 (P<0.001) 123 patients [40674713]
NOSE SMD in sleep-disordered breathing -4.99 (-9.12 to -0.85) 27 cohorts, 1,192 patients [42314704]
SCHNOS at 1 year, preservation vs hump resection No difference (P=.90) 84 randomized patients [38366551]
SCHNOS-O and SCHNOS-C after perforation repair -31.93 and -44.19 31 patients [38648541]
NOSE and VAS with prophylactic autospreader flaps Back to preoperative by 1 year Cosmetic primaries [42415377]
Spreader graft vs spreader flap, NOSE and valve angle No difference 10 studies, 567 patients [34864854]
Remote vs in-person nasal exam agreement Kappa 0.66 vs 0.78 20 subjects [37358622]

What is still contested or missing

  • PNIF did not improve despite NOSE and rhinomanometry gains; I2 up to 97.9% [35099579]
  • Epworth improvement's CI crosses zero; small-study effects detected; data mostly observational [42314704]
  • QoL review authors cite limited number and quality of studies [37173413]
  • Nasal packing remains contentious — "some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it" [38485786]; commentaries [38648531, 37169892, 32377788, 31145779] are title-only on file [38485786, 38648531, 37169892, 32377788, 31145779]
  • Cadaveric rib and revision risk in functional rhinoplasty rest on one 259-patient cohort with a reported confidence interval that crosses 1 [40147429]
  • Endonasal SEG breathing data are a 34-patient pilot with a mean follow-up of 127 days [38350156]
  • Nasal valve diagnosis (imaging, endoscopy, rhinomanometry) still splits surgeons by specialty and volume 14 years after the consensus statement [34495760]
  • Perforation repair during rhinoplasty: 83.8% closure in 31 patients and 2 case reports; no comparison against staged repair [38648541, 41071182]
  • Remote examination validated on 20 healthy volunteers, not obstructed patients [37358622]

Papers used

  • Ozgenc I et al.. Comparative Outcomes of Septal Extension versus Columellar Strut Grafts for Nasal Tip Stabilization and Positioning in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40854551. DOI 10.1055/a-2689-1496
  • Chan C et al.. Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42532128. DOI 10.1055/a-2927-6789
  • Ang LF et al.. Impact of Functional Rhinoplasty on Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42314704. DOI 10.1055/a-2891-4516
  • Tanvar S, Basu R. Management of Lateral Crura Deformity in Functional and Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Classification, Surgical Algorithm, and Outcome-Based Approach. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42624495. DOI 10.1055/a-2940-5266
  • Saman M, Saban Y. Invited Commentary: "Comparison of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques: Functional and Aesthetic Review of Subdorsal Septal Strip Methods" by Barrera. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2026. PMID 38648531. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0101 (title only)
  • Caimi E et al.. Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication Management. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 38485786. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-03907-4
  • Chen K, Zhou L. The Effect of Functional Rhinoplasty on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 37173413. DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03390-3
  • Barrera JE. Comparison of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques: Functional and Aesthetic Review of Subdorsal Septal Strip Methods. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 38648529. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0191
  • Tremp M et al.. A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Principles. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023. PMID 36826521. DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03293-3
  • Toriumi DM. Invited Discussion on paper entitled, "A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Principles". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023. PMID 37169892. DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03358-3 (title only)
  • Harel M et al.. Evolution of the Septal Extension Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Long-term Efficacy and Reliability. Aesthet Surg J 2022. PMID 35554489. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjac121
  • Keyhan SO et al.. Spreader Graft vs Spreader Flap in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2022. PMID 34864854. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab409
  • Zhao R et al.. Effects of Functional Rhinoplasty on Nasal Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022. PMID 35099579. DOI 10.1007/s00266-021-02741-2
  • Cerkes N. Invited Discussion On: Nasal Obstruction and Rhinoplasty-A Focused Literature Review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020. PMID 32377788. DOI 10.1007/s00266-020-01735-w (title only)
  • Wright L et al.. Nasal Obstruction and Rhinoplasty: A Focused Literature Review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020. PMID 32328743. DOI 10.1007/s00266-020-01710-5
  • East C. Commentary on: Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Review. Aesthet Surg J 2019. PMID 31145779. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz130 (title only)
  • Zarei R et al.. Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Trial. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38366551. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae038
  • McCleary S et al.. Dorsal Preservation versus Open Structural Rhinoplasty: Can We Tell the Difference between Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 40331571. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012050
  • Goldfarb JM et al.. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Including Nasal Breathing Improvement After Functional Rhinoplasty Using Endonasal Septal Extension Grafting. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 38350156. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0205
  • Sozansky Lujan J et al.. Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Let Down Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023. PMID 36282789. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0019
  • Jabbour N et al.. Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 42415377. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag145
  • van Zijl FVWJ et al.. The Rhinoplasty Rosetta Stone: Using Rasch Analysis to Create and Validate Crosswalks between the NOSE and the SCHNOS Functional Subscale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 38551458. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011438
  • Taylor CM, Barrera JE. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Fresh Frozen Homologous Costal Cartilage in Primary, Revision, and Functional Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40674713. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012303
  • Upton MK et al.. Complications in Functional Rhinoplasty Related to Cartilage Graft Source. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2025. PMID 40147429. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0277
  • McCleary S et al.. Does Laterality of the Caudal Septal Extension Graft Matter? A Photograph-Based Analysis of Symmetry in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40875573. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012408
  • Namgoong S et al.. A Comparative Study of Septal Extension Graft versus Derotation Graft for Short Nose Correction in Asian Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39965161. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012022
  • Huang CJ et al.. Efficacy of Combined Septal Extension and Derotation Grafts in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Tip Projection and Stability. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41990353. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag079
  • Rosi-Schumacher M, Sherris DA. Outcomes Following Rhinoplasty Using the Combined Septal Extension-Columellar Strut Graft. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 39187271. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0132
  • Wang J et al.. A Modified Technique in Rhinoplasty: A Septal Extension Graft Complex Using Septal Cartilage, Ethmoid Bone, and Auricular Cartilage. Aesthet Surg J 2023. PMID 35786707. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjac185
  • Kwon KW. Use of Perpendicular Plate of Ethmoid Split Technique in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39138596. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011678
  • Çelik V, Tuluy Y. Modification of Low-Septal-Strip Septoplasty to Reduce Hump Recurrence in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39023572. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011640
  • Nakamura F et al.. Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Using a Ferreira-Nakamura Spare Roof Technique B Highlighting the Low Septal Cartilage Strip. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 39087910. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0079
  • Erdal AI, Genç İG. Transection of Pitanguy's Midline Ligament to Avoid Supratip Depression in Closed-Approach, Low-Septal-Resection Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2023. PMID 35908175. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjac211
  • Sazgar AA et al.. Simultaneous Rhinoplasty and Septal Perforation Repair Using the Bone-Cartilaginous Unit. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38648541. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae098
  • Mariño-Sanchez F et al.. "Pedicled Flaps for Nasal Septal Perforation and Graft Framework: Enhancing Outcomes in Preservation and Structural Rhinoplasty". Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 41071182. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012511
  • Ueno K et al.. Primary Septal Cartilage Graft for Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: 10-Year Follow-Up Results and the Effect on Septal Deviation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 41100821. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012525
  • Kim YC et al.. Septal Reposition during Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Second Chance for Correcting Caudal Septal Deviation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37467053. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010923
  • Saito T et al.. Septal Extension Graft in Cleft Rhinoplasty: Patients with Secondary Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37797231. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011106
  • Harounian JA et al.. Variation in Practice Patterns of Current Rhinoplasty Surgeons for Nasal Valve Compromise. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 34495760. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0114
  • Shomorony A et al.. Augmented Virtual Examination for Cosmetic and Functional Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 37358622. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0018

Written by rhinoplasty.cc, 2026-09-08, from the PubMed abstracts; not medical advice.

Start here

The 40 papers the synthesis above was written from.

  1. FPS
    2026PMID 40854551Summary
  2. FPS
    2026PMID 42532128Summary
  3. FPS
    2026PMID 42314704Summary
  4. FPS
    2026PMID 42624495Summary
  5. FPSAM
    2026PMID 38648531
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38485786Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37173413Summary
  8. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38648529Summary
  9. APS
    2023PMID 36826521Summary
  10. APS
    2023PMID 37169892
  11. ASJ
    2022PMID 35554489Summary
  12. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  13. APS
    2022PMID 35099579Summary
  14. APS
    2020PMID 32377788
  15. APS
    2020PMID 32328743Summary
  16. ASJ
    2019PMID 31145779
  17. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  18. PRS
    2025PMID 40331571Summary
  19. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38350156Summary
  20. FPSAM
    2023PMID 36282789Summary
  21. ASJ
    2026PMID 42415377Summary
  22. PRS
    2024PMID 38551458Summary
  23. PRS
    2026PMID 40674713Summary
  24. FPSAM
    2025PMID 40147429Summary
  25. PRS
    2026PMID 40875573Summary
  26. PRS
    2025PMID 39965161Summary
  27. ASJ
    2026PMID 41990353Summary
  28. FPSAM
    2024PMID 39187271Summary
  29. ASJ
    2023PMID 35786707Summary
  30. PRS
    2025PMID 39138596Summary
  31. PRS
    2025PMID 39023572Summary
  32. FPSAM
    2024PMID 39087910Summary
  33. ASJ
    2023PMID 35908175Summary
  34. ASJ
    2024PMID 38648541Summary
  35. PRS
    2025PMID 41071182Summary
  36. PRS
    2026PMID 41100821Summary
  37. PRS
    2024PMID 37467053Summary
  38. PRS
    2024PMID 37797231Summary
  39. FPSAM
    2024PMID 34495760Summary
  40. FPSAM
    2024PMID 37358622Summary

Related topics

47

Anatomy and nasal analysis

47 of the 195 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
45

Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology

45 of the 195 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
41

Rib, ear and septal grafts

41 of the 195 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
38

Cleft, trauma and reconstruction

38 of the 195 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic

Every paper, by year

195 papers. The 40 Start here papers are not repeated.

202629 papers · 10 above
  1. APS
    PMID 41857160Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 40855022Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 41711880Full text
  4. APS
    PMID 41436885
  5. APS
    PMID 41345307Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 42014527Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 41629470Summary
  8. APS
    PMID 42303768Summary
  9. APS
    PMID 41198886Summary
  10. APS
    PMID 41922621Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 41418809Summary
  12. FPS
    PMID 40239953Summary
  13. FPS
    PMID 41887610Summary
  14. FPS
    PMID 40185154Summary
  15. FPS
    PMID 41265885Summary
  16. FPSAM
    PMID 40100960
  17. PRS
    PMID 41930748
  18. PRS
    PMID 42554674
  19. PRS-GO
    PMID 41907079Summary
202517 papers · 6 above
  1. APS
    PMID 40195130Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 39929985Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 39227471Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 38977457Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 38834177Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 40865067
  7. PRS
    PMID 39999233
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 40416407Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 39958713Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 41050978Summary
  11. PRS-GO
    PMID 39816899Summary
202422 papers · 13 above
  1. APS
    PMID 37749417Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 38575764Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 37945758Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 37567945Summary
  5. FPS Clin
    PMID 39341667Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 39480255
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 39421678Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 39157708Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 39507311Summary
202320 papers · 5 above
  1. APS
    PMID 37640816Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 34494130Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 35577032Summary
  4. FPS
    Functional Rhinoplasty
    Olson KL, Sivam SK
    PMID 37500077
  5. FPS
    Pediatric Functional Rhinoplasty
    Shave S, Vella J, Chandy B
    PMID 37619608Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 37604185Summary
  7. FPSAM
    PMID 36282776
  8. FPSAM
    PMID 36946885Summary
  9. FPSAM
    PMID 36169630Summary
  10. FPS Clin
    PMID 36396285Summary
  11. PRS
    PMID 36696324Summary
  12. PRS
    PMID 36827472Summary
  13. PRS
    PMID 36728586Summary
  14. PRS
    PMID 36940157Summary
  15. PRS-GO
    PMID 37731727Summary
202212 papers · 3 above
  1. APS
    PMID 34231023
  2. APS
    PMID 34254162
  3. FPS
    PMID 34428809
  4. FPS
    PMID 34983078Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 34161991Summary
  6. FPSAM
    PMID 34494891Summary
  7. FPSAM
    PMID 33847511Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 35960927
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 35141100Full text
202118 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 33564830Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 33649928Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 32322931Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 32875438Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 32766918Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 32747985Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 33507350Summary
  8. APS
    PMID 32880669
  9. APS
    PMID 32974740
  10. APS
    PMID 33837462
  11. APS
    PMID 33855581Full text
  12. APS
    PMID 33758974Summary
  13. FPS
    PMID 33626586Summary
  14. FPSAM
    PMID 32716730Summary
  15. FPSAM
    PMID 32380851
  16. FPS Clin
    PMID 33220836Summary
  17. PRS-GO
    PMID 33564570Summary
  18. PRS-GO
    PMID 34815917Summary
202012 papers · 2 above
  1. APS
    PMID 31463565Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 31485763Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 32016500Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 32055938
  5. APS
    PMID 31637501
  6. APS
    PMID 31624893
  7. FPS
    PMID 32191963Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 32557440Summary
  9. FPSAM
    PMID 32212970
  10. PRS
    PMID 32332531Summary
201910 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 30722008Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 30706084Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 31263933Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 30264272Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 30868305Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 30388718Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 30566989Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 30654390Summary
  9. JAMA FPS
    PMID 31600382Summary
201813 papers
  1. FPS
    PMID 30041266Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 29857333Summary
  3. FPS Clin
    PMID 30005789Summary
  4. JAMA FPS
    PMID 29450446Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28910438Summary
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28880988Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 30326520Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 29608514
  9. PRS
    PMID 28953561
  10. PRS
    PMID 29608516
  11. PRS
    PMID 28938353
  12. PRS-GO
    PMID 29707440Summary
  13. PRS-GO
    PMID 30349780Summary
201715 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 27277275
  2. FPS
    PMID 28753714
  3. FPS
    PMID 28962063
  4. FPS
    PMID 28571072Summary
  5. FPS Clin
    PMID 28340656Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    PMID 28340646Summary
  7. FPS Clin
    Functional Rhinoplasty
    Friedman O, Cekic E, Gunel C
    PMID 28340650Summary
  8. FPS Clin
    PMID 28340648Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 28445370
  10. PRS
    PMID 28953720
  11. PRS
    PMID 28820829
  12. PRS
    PMID 28098711Summary
  13. PRS
    PMID 28820828
  14. PRS
    PMID 28234832Summary
  15. PRS
    PMID 28953719Summary
20169 papers
  1. CPS
    PMID 26616692Summary
  2. FPS
    Functional Rhinoplasty
    Hamilton GS 3rd
    PMID 26862956
  3. FPS
    PMID 27494579Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 26862961Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26540027
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 27491048Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26660141Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 27556616Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 27014540Summary
20156 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 25631786Summary
  2. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26432958
  3. PRS
    PMID 25811570Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 26505717Summary
  5. PRS
    PMID 25742526
  6. PRS
    PMID 25700299
20142 papers
  1. JAMA FPS
    PMID 25079613Summary
  2. PRS
    PMID 24569427Summary
20132 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 23636623Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 23708246Summary
20126 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 22328697
  2. APS
    PMID 22890858Summary
  3. Arch FPS
    PMID 22250267Summary
  4. Arch FPS
    PMID 22006234Summary
  5. Arch FPS
    PMID 22965002Summary
  6. Arch FPS
    PMID 22986938Summary
20112 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 22001343Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 21404159Summary