rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · Septum, valve and airway · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2024

FPSAM Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine · 2024

Comparison of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques: Functional and Aesthetic Review of Subdorsal Septal Strip Methods

Barrera JE.

What this paper says

Comparing 35 patients treated with the modified subdorsal strip method against 36 treated with the Z flap, breathing and appearance scores improved significantly in both with no difference between techniques.

Overview

Dorsal preservation lowers the bridge by removing a strip of septal cartilage from beneath it, and several ways of cutting that strip exist. The author compared two of them using patient reported outcome measures. Patients treated from 2020 to 2022 with either method were assessed on four questionnaires at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Sections of note

  • Design: comparative review using patient reported outcome measures, analyzed by two sample t-test.
  • 71 primary rhinoplasty patients met inclusion criteria at 12 months, average age 23, 62 women and 9 men. 35 had the modified subdorsal strip method; 36 had the Z flap.
  • Instruments: NOSE, SNOT-22, SCHNOS and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
  • NOSE is reported as 9.36 before and minus 4.4 after, p less than 0.001; SNOT-22 as 23.9 before and minus 16.4 after; Epworth as 6.2 before and minus 1.6 after. These appear to mix baseline values with change values as printed.
  • SCHNOS total, functional and cosmetic averaged 27.6, 8.2 and 18.7 before surgery, with reported changes of minus 5.7, minus 5.73 and minus 18.1, all p less than 0.001.
  • No significant complications occurred and no difference in outcomes between the two techniques.

What it means for a patient

  • Both ways of cutting the septal strip produced similar improvements in breathing and appearance at one year.
  • Daytime sleepiness also improved, which is measured because nasal blockage disrupts sleep.
  • Limits: 71 patients, one surgeon, no randomization stated, one year of follow up, and reported numbers that are hard to read since negative values appear on scales with a floor of zero.

Why this paper matters

Preservation rhinoplasty debates focus heavily on which septal strip technique is best, largely on theoretical grounds. Comparing two directly with validated questionnaires finds no difference. Whether they differ in hump recurrence, the main preservation failure mode, is not reported here.

Terms

  • Dorsal preservation: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
  • Subdorsal septal strip: a band of septal cartilage removed from beneath the bridge to let it settle.
  • Z flap: a technique cutting the subdorsal strip in a Z shape to allow controlled repositioning.
  • SNOT-22: a 22 item questionnaire measuring sinus and nasal symptoms and their impact.
  • Epworth Sleepiness Scale: a questionnaire measuring daytime sleepiness.
  • SCHNOS: a validated questionnaire scoring both nasal appearance and nasal blockage.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“To compare subdorsal strip excisions in patients undergoing dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty using patient-related outcome measures (PROMS). Methods: Patients were treated from 2020 to 2022 using the modified subdorsal strip method (MSSM) or Z flap approach. A two-sample t-test determined whether there was a…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Year
2024
Authors
1
Type
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 39436834
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 38992914Summary
  4. ASJ
    2024PMID 37738132Summary
  5. ASJ
    2024PMID 38314894Summary
  6. ASJ
    2024PMID 38648541Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37610518Full text
  8. APS
    2024PMID 37749417Summary