rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · by topic

Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology

233 papers with rhinoplasty in the title matching this topic, 2011 to 2026.

233
Papers
40
Start here
175
Abstracts on file
58
Open access
9
Journals
2011
First year
2026
Latest year
175
Summaries written
APS59PRS49FPS44FPSAM30ASJ21JAMA FPS13PRS-GO12FPS Clin4Arch FPS1
42011520124201362014620157201662017132018122019172020192021202022192023352024262025342026

What the literature says

Synthesised from the abstracts of the 40 papers listed under Start here. Every line carries the PubMed ID it rests on.

Two-sentence lead. Rhinoplasty results are now scored with patient-reported instruments (SCHNOS, NOSE, VAS, ROE, FACE-Q) but no single validated tool covers both appearance and breathing; a Rasch crosswalk now converts NOSE to SCHNOS-O, Dutch population norms exist for four aesthetic scales, and a new 25-item scale measures the distress of first seeing the nose after cast removal. About 30% of Asian rhinoplasty candidates screen positive for body dysmorphic disorder, positive screens resolved in 83% after surgery in one cohort, litigating patients score lower on body-image and self-esteem scales, and technique matched to the patient's anatomy tracks with higher satisfaction and fewer revisions.

Key points

  • PROMs in rhinoplasty RCTs, 12 trials (n=743; mean follow-up 9.1 months; mean age 35.35 ± 5.95; male:female 1:1.91): 10 distinct PROMs in use; FACE-Q met 19 of 21 development standards but cannot assess nasal airway or breathing; no standardized rhinoplasty-specific PROM exists [41071223]
  • Body dysmorphic disorder in Asian rhinoplasty seekers, 15 studies (n=1,977): pooled 30.0% (95% CI 26.8-35.7); 36% by BDD Questionnaire vs 18% by DSM-V [40907540]
  • Ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty, 17 studies: satisfaction SMD 0.68 [0.63-0.73]; complications 8.7% vs 17.4%; revisions 5.3% vs 12.1%; Caucasian satisfaction gain lowest (0.21) [40906288]
  • Ethnic outcomes review, 14 studies (2000-2023): high satisfaction across groups; graft-supported techniques carried lower complication rates [40494973]
  • Dorsal preservation n=178 vs hump reduction n=199: SCHNOS-C better with DPR at 6 months after adjustment; no aesthetic difference at 12 or 24 months; function equal at all points [42053436]
  • DPR meta-analysis, 6 studies (n=753): VAS-C -0.5215 and SCHNOS-C 1.9385 favoring DPR to 6 months; no obstruction-score difference (NOSE -3.7884 [-10.2381; 2.6612]) [40195129]
  • Functional outcomes, 22 studies (n=2,058): preservation and structural equal in controlled studies; both improve NOSE, SCHNOS-O, VAS-F, SNOT-22 [42532128]
  • DPR vs hump reduction, 9 studies (n=1364): SNOT-22 difference -2.88 between groups; late complication OR 0.21 favoring DPR [42418006]
  • Filler rhinoplasty, 30 studies (n=9657): satisfaction 99.08%; complications 39.11%, mostly erythema and swelling [38862661]
  • Fat injection, 11 studies: satisfaction 63 to 100% (approximately 81.2%) in 820 patients; reinjection at least 19.27% at 1 year [39751904]
  • Triamcinolone acetonide injections after rhinoplasty, 6 of 1604 articles (n=1524): reported safe as first-line for supratip edema and pollybeak; may reduce need for revision; dosing, timing, and intervals tabulated [38519572]
  • Fresh frozen rib cartilage, 4 articles (n=554; 86% female; mean age 35.8-40.6; follow-up 12.2-20.3 months): infection 12 (2%), warping 8 (1.4%), resorption 3 (0.5%); only 1 study had an autologous control [38528125]
  • Septal extension graft vs columellar strut (256 vs 371): long-term nasolabial angle favored SEG; Goode's ratio improved only after SEG [40854551]
  • Lateral crura algorithm, 50 patients, 5-point Likert satisfaction: 90% reported significant aesthetic and functional improvement; 4% revision [42624495]
  • Dutch population norms for aesthetic rhinoplasty PROMs, weighted n=1,134: Utrecht Questionnaire 6.28, SCHNOS-C 11.38, FACE-Q nose 75.2, FACE-Q nostrils 80.09, NRS 7.67; satisfaction rose with age, faster in men; non-Western background scored lower (FACE-Q nose OR 1.819, p=0.004; SCHNOS-C OR 0.417, p<0.001); sex, education, income and residence had no effect [42670247]
  • NOSE to SCHNOS-O crosswalk by Rasch analysis, 552 patients plus a validation sample: intraclass correlation 0.93 both directions; SCHNOS-O slightly higher than NOSE at moderate obstruction [38551458]
  • Mirror-Confrontation and Early Adaptation Distress Scale (MEADS-25), validated in 260 primary rhinoplasty patients: five-factor structure, high internal consistency and test-retest reliability; strong association with appearance distress and social appearance anxiety [42424527]
  • Body dysmorphia screening (BDDQ-AS) before and after rhinoplasty, 115 patients (88% female): 83% of positive screens resolved after surgery; positive screens before and after correlated with worse aesthetic satisfaction (P<.002); no PROM predicted who would resolve [38452148]
  • Malpractice claims after rhinoplasty, 55 litigants vs 85 controls (Level 3): litigants older (P=.002), less educated, more often operated by specialists rather than professors (P<.001) in private hospitals (P=.010); more somatization (P=.019); lower body-image quality of life, appearance satisfaction and self-esteem (all P<.05); low BIQLI and specialist-level surgery predicted litigation [41419223]
  • Blinded raters, 78 participants: surgical approach identified correctly 52.9% of the time; ROE and SCHNOS obstruction composites equal between preservation and structural cohorts [40331571]
  • Crowdsourced ratings, 30 DPR vs 34 structural: both improved (0.300 vs 0.377); crowd detected surgery in structural noses (r=0.74) but not preserved ones (r=-0.0554) [39498873]
  • Randomized trial, 84 patients: hump resection with spreader flaps vs dorsal preservation showed no difference in VAS (P=.81) or SCHNOS (P=.90) at 1 year [38366551]
  • Let-down preservation, 52 patients: NOSE, SNOT-22 and SCHNOS improved at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months; Epworth only to 3 months; no difference between MSSM and Z-flap [36282789]
  • Endonasal septal extension graft with septoplasty and turbinoplasty, 34 patients: NOSE change -49.4, SNOT-22 -24.2, ESS -3.4, SCHNOS functional -44.5 (all p<0.001); no complications [38350156]
  • Fresh frozen homologous rib, 123 patients: NOSE -7.9, SNOT-22 -18.9, Epworth -4.8, SCHNOS total -13.5; infection 2.4% [40674713]
  • Fresh-frozen costal cartilage, 282 rhinoplasties at mean 20.3 months: antibiotics 2.1%, revision 2.1%, no warping or resorption [37815290]
  • Autologous vs irradiated homologous rib, 143 patients: revision 14.8% vs 14.6% (p=0.98); infection 4.9% vs 3.7% [38502836]
  • Combined septal extension-columellar strut graft, 32 primaries: NOSE 34.4 to 4.84; reviewer aesthetic score 11.96 to 1.83; no revisions [39187271]
  • Prophylactic autospreader flaps: NOSE and VAS worsened at 1 month and returned to baseline by 1 year; net dorsal widening 1 mm, not significant [42415377]
  • Bone-cartilaginous unit for deviated noses, 28 patients at 1 year or more: deviation 1.82 to 0.13 degrees, middle-third width ratio 1.28 to 1.19 (p<0.001); NOSE and ROE improved (p<0.001) [37083441]
  • Lateral crural repositioning in 42 revisions: SCHNOS-O, SCHNOS-C, VAS-F and VAS-C improved at 3.1 and 11.5 months [37115534]
  • Columella-labial incision in 91 multiply operated noses: SCHNOS-O 52.86 to 18.43, SCHNOS-C 78.09 to 20.19; no dehiscence [40408098]
  • Secondary liquid rhinoplasty, 1,122 patients: satisfaction 92%, complications 2.8% [41124352]
  • Tajima reverse-U for secondary cleft nose, 96 patients: FACE-Q nostril 79.72 to 85.95 at 1 week and 82.61 at 5 years [38967637]
  • Intermediate cleft rhinoplasty, 372 procedures: 55.0% of those followed past 18 needed no further surgery; authors note patient-reported outcomes are missing [39560597]
  • Nasal valve practice survey, 113 surgeons: concordance with the 2010 consensus but disagreement on imaging, endoscopy and rhinomanometry by specialty and volume [34495760]
  • Tip graft systematic review, 44 studies: Newcastle-Ottawa 6.5 of 9, Jadad 2.5 of 5; patient-reported outcomes in only 27.3% [36723630]
  • Septal perforation repair with pedicled flaps under a preserved dorsum, 2 cases [41071182]

Techniques and terms named

FACE-Q [41071223], SCHNOS [42053436], NOSE [42532128], SNOT-22 [42418006], VAS-C / VAS-O [40195129], Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire [40907540], DSM-V [40907540], 5-point Likert [42624495], GRADE / Cochrane Risk of Bias [41071223], Newcastle-Ottawa / AHRQ [40906288], MINORS [40494973], PROSPERO registration [41071223], ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty [40906288], dorsal preservation / conventional hump reduction [42053436], triamcinolone acetonide injection [38519572], fresh frozen cartilage [38528125], autologous fat injection [39751904], hyaluronic acid / calcium hydroxyapatite filler [38862661], septal extension graft / columellar strut [40854551], Goode's ratio / nasolabial angle [40854551], Dutch PROM norms (Utrecht Questionnaire, SCHNOS-C, FACE-Q, NRS) [42670247], NOSE-SCHNOS-O crosswalk [38551458], MEADS-25 mirror-confrontation distress [42424527], BDDQ-AS screening resolution [38452148], malpractice predictors (BIQLI, RSES, SWAS, SCL-90-R) [41419223], blinded rater identification [40331571], crowdsourced aesthetic rating [39498873], randomized preservation vs resection [38366551], let-down PROMs [36282789], endonasal SEG PROMs [38350156], FFHCC PROMs [40674713], fresh-frozen costal cartilage outcomes [37815290], autologous vs irradiated rib [38502836], combined SEG-strut graft [39187271], autospreader flap function [42415377], bone-cartilaginous unit for deviation [37083441], lateral crural repositioning outcomes [37115534], columella-labial incision SCHNOS [40408098], secondary liquid rhinoplasty satisfaction [41124352], FACE-Q in cleft [38967637], intermediate cleft rhinoplasty outcomes [39560597], nasal valve consensus survey [34495760], pedicled perforation flaps [41071182]

Numbers to remember

  • FACE-Q met 19 of 21 standards; 10 PROMs across 12 RCTs, n=743 [41071223]
  • BDD 30.0% pooled; 36% vs 18% by instrument, n=1,977 [40907540]
  • Satisfaction SMD 0.68; revisions 5.3% vs 12.1% with tailored technique [40906288]
  • 99.08% satisfaction in 9657 filler patients [38862661]
  • No functional difference across 2,058 preservation/structural patients [42532128]
  • 1524 patients across 6 triamcinolone studies [38519572]
  • Population norms n=1,134: FACE-Q nose 75.2, SCHNOS-C 11.38 [42670247]
  • BDDQ-AS positive screens resolved in 83% of 115 after surgery [38452148]
  • Litigants 55 vs 85 controls: low body-image QoL and specialist-level surgery predicted claims [41419223]
  • Crosswalk ICC 0.93; MEADS-25 validated in 260 [38551458, 42424527]
  • Raters correct 52.9%; crowd r=0.74 structural vs -0.06 preserved [40331571, 39498873]

Numbers

Measure Value Population / study PMID
Revision rate, ethnicity-conscious vs conventional 5.3% vs 12.1% 17 studies [40906288]
Revision rate, autologous vs irradiated rib 14.8% vs 14.6% 143 patients [38502836]
Revision rate, fresh-frozen costal cartilage 2.1% 282 patients [37815290]
Revision rate, lateral crura algorithm 4% 50 patients [42624495]
No further surgery after intermediate cleft rhinoplasty 55.0% 60 followed past 18 [39560597]
Complication rate, ethnicity-conscious vs conventional 8.7% vs 17.4% 17 studies [40906288]
Complications, secondary liquid rhinoplasty 2.8% 1,122 patients [41124352]
Complications, filler rhinoplasty pooled 39.11%, mostly erythema and swelling 9,657 patients [38862661]
Infection, fresh frozen rib 2% pooled; 2.4% and 2.1% in series 554; 123; 282 patients [38528125]
Late complications, DPR vs hump reduction OR 0.21 1,364 patients [42418006]
Satisfaction SMD, ethnicity-conscious rhinoplasty 0.68 (0.63-0.73) 17 studies [40906288]
Satisfaction, filler rhinoplasty 99.08% pooled; 92% secondary 9,657; 1,122 [38862661]
Satisfaction, fat injection 63% to 100% (about 81.2%) 820 patients [39751904]
Satisfaction, lateral crura algorithm 90% significant improvement 50 patients [42624495]
BDD screen prevalence, Asian candidates 30.0% 1,977 patients [40907540]
BDD screen resolution after surgery 83% 115 patients [38452148]
FACE-Q nostril, secondary cleft 79.72 to 82.61 at 5 years 96 patients [38967637]
FACE-Q nose norm, general population 75.2 (nostrils 80.09) 1,134 Dutch adults [42670247]
NOSE change, endonasal SEG -49.4 34 patients [38350156]
NOSE change, combined SEG-strut 34.4 to 4.84 32 patients [39187271]
SCHNOS-O and SCHNOS-C, columella-labial incision 52.86 to 18.43; 78.09 to 20.19 91 patients [40408098]
SCHNOS-C advantage of DPR To 6 months only 753 patients [40195129]
Raters identifying technique 52.9% correct 78 participants [40331571]
PROM crosswalk agreement ICC 0.93 552 patients [38551458]

What is still contested or missing

  • No validated PROM captures both aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty outcomes; FACE-Q omits breathing [41071223]
  • BDD prevalence halves depending on diagnostic tool; standardized protocols lacking [40907540]
  • DPR's early cosmetic advantage is "associative rather than causal" [42053436]
  • Triamcinolone evidence is limited and needs RCTs [38519572]; fresh frozen rib has one controlled study [38528125]; commentaries [41225218, 38977451] are title-only on file [38519572, 38528125, 41225218, 38977451]
  • Population norms are Dutch and online-panel based; non-Western respondents score lower, which complicates cross-national benchmarks [42670247]
  • BDD screen resolution after surgery (83%) comes from one surgeon's 115 patients and conflicts with the traditional view that BDD predicts dissatisfaction [38452148]
  • Litigation predictors derive from 55 forensic referrals in one country; surgeon rank and hospital type may proxy for case mix [41419223]
  • MEADS-25 is newly validated and has no outcome data yet [42424527]
  • Tip-graft literature reports patient-reported outcomes in 27.3% of studies [36723630]

Papers used

  • Gharibi R et al.. Comments on "Autologous Fat Injection for Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Satisfaction, Reinjection, and Fat Retention". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41225218. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05387-6 (title only)
  • Khatib M et al.. Comparison of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty and Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42418006. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-06105-6
  • Hashemipour Y, Danesh HA. Ethnic Considerations in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in Caucasian Versus Non-Caucasian Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40906288. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05189-w
  • Ozgenc I et al.. Comparative Outcomes of Septal Extension versus Columellar Strut Grafts for Nasal Tip Stabilization and Positioning in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40854551. DOI 10.1055/a-2689-1496
  • Chan C et al.. Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42532128. DOI 10.1055/a-2927-6789
  • Tanvar S, Basu R. Management of Lateral Crura Deformity in Functional and Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Classification, Surgical Algorithm, and Outcome-Based Approach. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42624495. DOI 10.1055/a-2940-5266
  • Chua NYM et al.. The Mirror of Culture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Asian Rhinoplasty Seekers. Facial Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40907540. DOI 10.1055/a-2689-1653
  • Wei EX et al.. Dorsal Preservation versus Conventional Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Seven-Year Review of Patient Reported Outcomes and Concurrent Operative Techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 42053436. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013154
  • Zeng H, Tang S. Autologous Fat Injection for Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Satisfaction, Reinjection and Fat Retention. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 39751904. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-04643-5
  • Kim DH et al.. Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 40195129. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-04828-6
  • Reid D et al.. Ethnic Variations and Surgical Outcomes in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 40494973. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-04939-0
  • Mortada H. Invited Response on: The Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 38977451. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-04191-y
  • Khajuria A et al.. A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 41071223. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012513
  • Khan M et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections Following Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Recommended Doses, Complications, and Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 38519572. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-03967-6
  • Kadhum M et al.. Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 38528125. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4
  • Song D et al.. Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review of Technique, Outcomes, Complications, and Its Treatments. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024. PMID 38862661. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-04161-4
  • Kasapov M et al.. Establishing Normative Data on Satisfaction with Nasal Appearance: a Dutch Population-Based Study Using Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Outcome Instruments. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 42670247. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag177
  • van Zijl FVWJ et al.. The Rhinoplasty Rosetta Stone: Using Rasch Analysis to Create and Validate Crosswalks between the NOSE and the SCHNOS Functional Subscale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 38551458. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011438
  • Abbas OL. Mirror-Confrontation Distress After Rhinoplasty: Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 42424527. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag146
  • Losorelli S et al.. Rhinoplasty Outcomes in Patients With Symptoms of Body Dysmorphia. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38452148. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae045
  • Oduncu M et al.. Psychological Red Flags in Rhinoplasty: Predictors of Malpractice Claims. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41419223. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf268
  • McCleary S et al.. Dorsal Preservation versus Open Structural Rhinoplasty: Can We Tell the Difference between Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 40331571. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012050
  • Alford JA et al.. Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 39498873. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae221
  • Zarei R et al.. Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Trial. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38366551. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae038
  • Sozansky Lujan J et al.. Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Let Down Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023. PMID 36282789. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0019
  • Goldfarb JM et al.. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Including Nasal Breathing Improvement After Functional Rhinoplasty Using Endonasal Septal Extension Grafting. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 38350156. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0205
  • Taylor CM, Barrera JE. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Fresh Frozen Homologous Costal Cartilage in Primary, Revision, and Functional Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40674713. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012303
  • Hanna SA et al.. Outcomes of the Use of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37815290. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011125
  • Drake VE et al.. Outcomes of Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 38502836. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334
  • Rosi-Schumacher M, Sherris DA. Outcomes Following Rhinoplasty Using the Combined Septal Extension-Columellar Strut Graft. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 39187271. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0132
  • Jabbour N et al.. Dorsal Width and Functional Outcomes with use of Autospreader Flaps in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 42415377. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag145
  • Sazgar AA et al.. Outcome Evaluation of Using Bone-Cartilaginous Units to Correct Deviated Noses in Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 37083441. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0303
  • Abdelhamid AS et al.. Patient Outcomes in Lateral Crural Repositioning and Reconstruction in Revision Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 37115534. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0434
  • Sazgar AA et al.. Strategic Use of the V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised Noses. Aesthet Surg J 2025. PMID 40408098. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf060
  • Valente DS, Zanella RK. Secondary Liquid Rhinoplasty: Challenges, Techniques, and Long-term Outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41124352. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf212
  • Liu Y et al.. Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in Patients with Secondary Nasal Deformity: Optimal Indications for Tajima Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 38967637. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011608
  • Ng JJ et al.. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Intermediate Cleft Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 39560597. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011878
  • Harounian JA et al.. Variation in Practice Patterns of Current Rhinoplasty Surgeons for Nasal Valve Compromise. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 34495760. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0114
  • Skochdopole AJ et al.. Current Surgical Outcomes of Nasal Tip Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36723630. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010257
  • Mariño-Sanchez F et al.. "Pedicled Flaps for Nasal Septal Perforation and Graft Framework: Enhancing Outcomes in Preservation and Structural Rhinoplasty". Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 41071182. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012511

Written by rhinoplasty.cc, 2026-09-08, from the PubMed abstracts; not medical advice.

Start here

The 40 papers the synthesis above was written from.

  1. APS
    2026PMID 41225218
  2. APS
    2026PMID 42418006Summary
  3. APS
    2026PMID 40906288Summary
  4. FPS
    2026PMID 40854551Summary
  5. FPS
    2026PMID 42532128Summary
  6. FPS
    2026PMID 42624495Summary
  7. FPS
    2026PMID 40907540Summary
  8. PRS
    2026PMID 42053436Summary
  9. APS
    2025PMID 39751904Summary
  10. APS
    2025PMID 40195129Summary
  11. APS
    2025PMID 40494973Summary
  12. APS
    2025PMID 38977451Summary
  13. PRS
    2025PMID 41071223Summary
  14. APS
    2024PMID 38519572Summary
  15. APS
    2024PMID 38528125Summary
  16. APS
    2024PMID 38862661Summary
  17. ASJ
    2026PMID 42670247Summary
  18. PRS
    2024PMID 38551458Summary
  19. ASJ
    2026PMID 42424527Summary
  20. ASJ
    2024PMID 38452148Summary
  21. ASJ
    2026PMID 41419223Summary
  22. PRS
    2025PMID 40331571Summary
  23. ASJ
    2025PMID 39498873Summary
  24. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  25. FPSAM
    2023PMID 36282789Summary
  26. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38350156Summary
  27. PRS
    2026PMID 40674713Summary
  28. PRS
    2024PMID 37815290Summary
  29. FPSAM
    2024PMID 38502836Summary
  30. FPSAM
    2024PMID 39187271Summary
  31. ASJ
    2026PMID 42415377Summary
  32. FPSAM
    2024PMID 37083441Summary
  33. FPSAM
    2024PMID 37115534Summary
  34. ASJ
    2025PMID 40408098Summary
  35. ASJ
    2026PMID 41124352Summary
  36. PRS
    2025PMID 38967637Summary
  37. PRS
    2025PMID 39560597Summary
  38. FPSAM
    2024PMID 34495760Summary
  39. PRS
    2023PMID 36723630Summary
  40. PRS
    2025PMID 41071182Summary

Related topics

61

Anatomy and nasal analysis

61 of the 233 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
45

Septum, valve and airway

45 of the 233 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
30

Preservation rhinoplasty

30 of the 233 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
30

Dorsum and hump

30 of the 233 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic

Every paper, by year

233 papers. The 40 Start here papers are not repeated.

202634 papers · 14 above
  1. APS
    PMID 41361150Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 42329439Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 41461968
  4. APS
    PMID 42014527Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 40770501Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 41963678Full text
  7. APS
    PMID 40921775Summary
  8. APS
    PMID 41813985Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 41248892Summary
  10. FPS
    PMID 40527484Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 40239953Summary
  12. FPS
    PMID 41265885Summary
  13. FPSAM
    PMID 41958069
  14. FPSAM
    PMID 41742847
  15. FPSAM
    PMID 41167652
  16. FPSAM
    PMID 41934318
  17. FPSAM
    PMID 41681113
  18. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091325Summary
  19. PRS
    PMID 41880548
  20. PRS
    PMID 41677802
202526 papers · 11 above
  1. APS
    PMID 39747421Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 39117869Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 38987315Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 39117324Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 38560987Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 40194547Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 39447621Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 38698638Summary
  9. FPSAM
    PMID 38738314
  10. FPSAM
    PMID 39570692
  11. FPSAM
    PMID 39056118
  12. FPS Clin
    PMID 40253112Summary
  13. PRS
    PMID 40865067
  14. PRS-GO
    PMID 41158592Summary
  15. PRS-GO
    PMID 40771258Summary
202435 papers · 13 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 38682262Full text
  2. APS
    PMID 37430011Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 38575764Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 38200126Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 37173413Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 37783865Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 37217605Summary
  8. APS
    PMID 38777929Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 38151040Summary
  10. FPS
    PMID 39029918Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 38331035Summary
  12. FPS
    PMID 39265640Summary
  13. FPS
    PMID 38537705
  14. FPS
    PMID 38336001Summary
  15. FPS
    PMID 38016662Summary
  16. FPS
    PMID 38016663Summary
  17. FPSAM
    PMID 38502837Summary
  18. FPSAM
    PMID 38150506
  19. PRS
    PMID 39480255
  20. PRS-GO
    PMID 39185377Summary
  21. PRS-GO
    PMID 39157708Summary
  22. PRS-GO
    PMID 39444535Summary
202319 papers · 2 above
  1. APS
    PMID 37069352Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 36302983Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 36651982Full text
  4. APS
    PMID 37474822Full text
  5. APS
    PMID 36877227Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 36283415Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 36787788Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 36791802Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 36787789Summary
  10. FPS
    PMID 37290455Summary
  11. FPSAM
    PMID 35506909
  12. FPSAM
    PMID 36282776
  13. FPSAM
    PMID 36976783Summary
  14. FPSAM
    PMID 36169630Summary
  15. PRS
    PMID 36827472Summary
  16. PRS
    PMID 36730430Summary
  17. PRS-GO
    PMID 37799442Summary
202220 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 34864854Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 34820690Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 34928400
  4. APS
    PMID 35320375
  5. APS
    PMID 35169915Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 35737021Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 36175688Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 35158388Summary
  9. FPS
    PMID 34428809
  10. FPS
    PMID 35114725Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 34161991Summary
  12. FPS
    PMID 36379459Summary
  13. FPSAM
    PMID 35172105Summary
  14. FPSAM
    PMID 33861624
  15. FPSAM
    PMID 35167351
  16. FPSAM
    PMID 34529515Summary
  17. FPSAM
    PMID 34495754Summary
  18. FPSAM
    PMID 33617352Summary
  19. PRS
    PMID 36067469
  20. PRS
    PMID 36067480
202119 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 33945612Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 32974739Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 32875438Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 32747985Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 33811290Summary
  6. APS
    PMID 33063160Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 32974740
  8. APS
    PMID 34075457Full text
  9. APS
    PMID 33660013Summary
  10. FPS
    PMID 33506453Summary
  11. FPS
    PMID 32886948Summary
  12. FPS
    Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study
    Papadopulos NA, Liebmann J, Kloeppel M et al.
    PMID 33706388Summary
  13. FPSAM
    PMID 33337943Summary
  14. FPSAM
    PMID 32716730Summary
  15. FPSAM
    PMID 33054380Summary
  16. FPS Clin
    PMID 33220839Summary
  17. FPS Clin
    PMID 33220841Summary
  18. PRS
    PMID 34270514Summary
  19. PRS-GO
    PMID 34522571Summary
202017 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 31181135
  2. ASJ
    PMID 31051500Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 31832733Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 32514639Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 32524196
  6. APS
    Psychological Analysis of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty
    Di Rosa L, Cerulli G, De Pasquale A
    PMID 31768580Summary
  7. APS
    PMID 32410198Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 32750725Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 31985674
  10. PRS
    PMID 31834232
  11. PRS
    PMID 32332543
  12. PRS
    PMID 32590640Summary
  13. PRS
    PMID 32332542Summary
  14. PRS
    PMID 31985675
  15. PRS
    PMID 31834230
  16. PRS-GO
    PMID 32537374Summary
  17. PRS-GO
    PMID 32802685Summary
201912 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 31145779
  2. ASJ
    PMID 30722008Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 30607575Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 30264272Summary
  5. FPS
    Outcomes in Rhinoplasty
    Saleh HA, Beegun I, Apaydin F
    PMID 30759460Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 30654390Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 31536105Summary
  8. JAMA FPS
    PMID 30605215Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 30601313
  10. PRS
    PMID 30601327Summary
  11. PRS
    PMID 31403561
  12. PRS-GO
    PMID 31942405Summary
201813 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 30265278
  2. FPS
    PMID 29857333Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 29857339Summary
  4. JAMA FPS
    PMID 29049494
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 29450446Summary
  6. JAMA FPS
    PMID 29470562Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28910438Summary
  8. JAMA FPS
    PMID 28880988Summary
  9. JAMA FPS
    PMID 30326520Summary
  10. PRS
    PMID 29135891Summary
  11. PRS
    Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Rhinoplasty
    Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P
    PMID 30036343
  12. PRS
    PMID 30252826
  13. PRS-GO
    PMID 29707440Summary
20176 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 28008458Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 28962052
  3. FPS
    Quality of Life-Changes after Rhinoplasty
    Niehaus R, Kovacs L, Machens HG et al.
    PMID 28962060
  4. PRS
    PMID 28953720
  5. PRS
    PMID 28953719Summary
  6. PRS-GO
    PMID 29062632Summary
20167 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 26063834Summary
  2. JAMA FPS
    PMID 27441889Summary
  3. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26605889Summary
  4. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26605763
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26660141Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 27140047
  7. PRS
    PMID 26818280Summary
20156 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 26063837Summary
  2. ASJ
    PMID 26063832
  3. ASJ
    PMID 25568232Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 25491014Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 26126227Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 25919265Summary
20146 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 24902906Summary
  2. FPS
    Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty
    Zojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR et al.
    PMID 25397717Summary
  3. JAMA FPS
    PMID 25079613Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 24374691
  5. PRS
    PMID 24374692
  6. PRS
    PMID 25415095Summary
20134 papers
  1. PRS
    PMID 24281624
  2. PRS
    PMID 23249985Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 23714816
  4. PRS
    Secondary rhinoplasty: patients' expectations and operative goals
    Persichetti P, Gigliofiorito P, Del Buono R et al.
    PMID 23714815
20125 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 21858595Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 21993575Summary
  3. Arch FPS
    PMID 22801761Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 22872553Summary
  5. PRS
    PMID 22456400
20114 papers
  1. PRS
    PMID 21788843
  2. PRS
    PMID 21701345Summary
  3. PRS
    PMID 21788842Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 22030516Summary