rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2020

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2020

Psychological Analysis of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty

Di Rosa L, Cerulli G, De Pasquale A.

What this paper says

Among 74 patients who completed a year of follow-up after hyaluronic acid nasal filler, the authors used a validated satisfaction questionnaire and propose it could also flag psychological traits before treatment.

Overview

This study tracked how patients perceived their noses before and after non-surgical correction with cross-linked hyaluronic acid, using a validated instrument. The authors also argue the same questionnaire could serve to identify patients likely to be difficult to satisfy.

Sections of note

  • 100 adults with no prior surgical or non-surgical rhinoplasty were treated with hyaluronic acid filler from December 2016 to December 2018.
  • Injection points were standardized by the authors and divided according to the aesthetic subunits of the nose.
  • 74 patients, 65 female and 9 male, completed one year of follow-up and were included.
  • The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire was used, consisting of six questions.
  • It assesses how patients perceive their nose and how they think people around them view it.
  • Results of each question were analyzed per patient, comparing preoperative results over a 12-month time frame.
  • The authors note literature showing a higher rate of psychiatric disorders among rhinoplasty candidates and frequent dissatisfaction, and suggest the questionnaire could highlight psychological characteristics before treatment. Level of evidence IV.

What it means for a patient

  • The abstract does not report the actual satisfaction scores or how they changed, only that they were analyzed.
  • A quarter of those treated did not complete the year of follow-up.
  • The proposed second use, screening for difficult-to-satisfy patients, is a suggestion rather than a tested finding.
  • Limits: 74 of 100 patients analyzed, single center, no comparison group, and no numeric results in the abstract.

Why this paper matters

Identifying patients unlikely to be satisfied is a recognized problem for both surgical and non-surgical nasal treatment. Repurposing an existing satisfaction questionnaire as a preoperative screen would be practical. The abstract presents no data validating that use.

Terms

  • Non-surgical rhinoplasty: Reshaping the nose with injectable filler instead of surgery.
  • Cross-linked hyaluronic acid: A gel filler chemically bonded to make it last longer.
  • Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation: A validated six-question satisfaction questionnaire.
  • Aesthetic subunit: A defined region of the nose treated as a distinct area.
  • Level of evidence IV: A ranking indicating a case series or comparable design.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The aim of this study is to analyze the psychological outcomes for patients undergoing non-surgical correction of nasal defects using injections of cross-linked hyaluronic acid. We assessed changes in the subjective perception of nasal appearance after non-surgical rhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2020
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2020.

  1. ASJ
    2020PMID 32756944Summary
  2. ASJ
    2020PMID 31181135
  3. ASJ
    2020PMID 32232381
  4. ASJ
    2020PMID 31675056
  5. ASJ
    2020PMID 31051500Summary
  6. ASJ
    2020PMID 32064498Summary
  7. ASJ
    2020PMID 31960890Summary
  8. APS
    2020PMID 31832733Summary