rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · by topic

Revision and secondary rhinoplasty

181 papers with rhinoplasty in the title matching this topic, 2011 to 2026.

181
Papers
38
Start here
145
Abstracts on file
41
Open access
9
Journals
2011
First year
2026
Latest year
145
Summaries written
PRS52APS32FPS27ASJ21PRS-GO17FPS Clin11FPSAM10JAMA FPS7CPS4
2201110201211201312201432015132016820171220185201972020172021162022132023132024122025272026

What the literature says

Synthesised from the abstracts of the 38 papers listed under Start here. Every line carries the PubMed ID it rests on.

Two-sentence lead. Revision surgery is needed in about 5% to 15% of rhinoplasties, most often for a tip that did not rotate enough, a hanging columella, supratip fullness, or blocked breathing from the septum or valves; the rate rises to 17% to 19% in patients with a psychiatric diagnosis or low nasal self-esteem. The field is moving toward staged classification of the revision patient, layered or off-the-shelf rib grafts for the dorsum (infection 2.4% to 2.7%), and filler touch-ups for minor post-surgical flaws.

Key points

  • Revision rate cited as 5% to 15%; PGS staging (P = problem, G = grafts needed, S = prior surgeries) plus E for expectations proposed, modeled on TNM [27149684]
  • 252 revisions after open rhinoplasty: revision rate 10.8%; top reasons insufficient tip rotation 37.7%, hanging columella 30.2%, supratip deformity 28.6% [34550928]
  • Columellar strut instead of tongue-in-groove raised risk of inadequate rotation 5.3-fold, hanging columella 5.9-fold, supratip deformity 2.2-fold; age >40 raised hanging-columella risk 6.8-fold; low preoperative projection raised inadequate-rotation risk 2-fold [34550928]
  • 46 revision cases with airway obstruction (mean age 34.9; mean 1.33 prior septorhinoplasties): septal deviation or valve dysfunction in 91.3%; grafts placed in 89.1%, septoplasty 76.1%, lateral wall support 47.8%, spreader grafts 39.1%; preoperative NOSE 61 ± 15 [28571072]
  • SPLF graft (perichondrium + laminated rib + rectus fascia, placed as one unit) in over 300 dorsal revisions, 2021-2024: no infections, no warping, no significant long-term complications [40826294]
  • Saddle nose, 60 patients (2016-2023, one surgeon): Type 1 66.7%, Type 2 25%, Type 3 5%, Type 4 3.3%; septal perforation in 10%; graft source septal 55%, auricular 28.3%, costal 15%; hyaluronic acid filler used preoperatively for skin expansion in one contracted case [42324394]
  • Columellar defect reconstruction with philtral flap and rib cartilage, 14 patients: respiratory index and aesthetic index both improved (p<.001); philtral length, columellar length, show, and Goode's ratio changed [41731229]
  • Secondary liquid rhinoplasty after surgical rhinoplasty, 1122 patients (Dec 2004-Feb 2025, ≥6 months follow-up): complication rate 2.8%, all minor and transient; satisfaction 92% [41124352]
  • Serotonergic antidepressants before rhinoplasty, 4917 matched pairs: 30-day readmission RR 1.793 (P=.01), opioid use RR 1.361, bleeding/hematoma RR 1.596 (P=.005); revision rates at 1 year comparable [41672725]
  • Preoperative intranasal desmopressin, 4 RCTs (n=262): total blood loss reduced 15.22 mL (95% CI -19.52 to -10.93; I2=0%) with a drier field [40456991]
  • ROE satisfaction meta-analysis, 8 observational studies: SMD 5.87 (95% CI 3.55-8.19); younger patients 6.69 vs older 3.48; peak at 6-12 months (SMD 11.07) [29135891]
  • Primary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty, 25 articles: 8 of 9 growth studies found no restriction; 43% to 100% avoided revision at ≥6 years follow-up [36409217]
  • Secondary cleft nasal sill classification, 276 patients (2019-2024): type I 4.71%, II 9.06%, III 26.45%, IV 59.78% [39572464]
  • Computer morphing at consult lets the surgeon postpone or cancel surgery when the patient rejects the proposed change; imaging is moving from 2D to 3D surface capture [26862968, 26862969]
  • Fresh frozen homologous costal cartilage (FFHCC), 123 primary, revision and functional rhinoplasties, mean follow-up 11 months: infection 2.4% (3), resorption 0.8% (1); NOSE improved 7.9 points, SNOT-22 18.9, Epworth 4.8, SCHNOS total 13.5 (all P<0.001) [40674713]
  • Fresh frozen rib in 226 revision rhinoplasties over 9 years (Rohrich), mean follow-up 12.2 months: infection 2.7% (6), 2.3% cleared with antibiotics alone; 54% had one prior rhinoplasty, 4% had four or more [35511072]
  • Non- or minimally irradiated homologous costal cartilage, 26 patients (19 revision), 100 grafts, mean follow-up 15.9 months: graft complications 3.6% (2 partial resorption, 1 infection), 0 warping, 0 mobility [32522045]
  • Lateral crural strut graft for post-implant tip deformities in Asian patients, 37 secondary cases at 12 months or more: ROE 30.41 to 75.90 (P<0.001); largest gain in lateral crural deformities, smallest in tip deviation; 2 asymmetric nostril/tip, 1 visible graft [40920505]
  • Lateral crural repositioning and reconstruction in 42 revisions: SCHNOS-Obstruction, SCHNOS-Cosmesis, VAS-functional and VAS-cosmetic all improved at 3.1 and 11.5 months (p<0.05); lateral wall insufficiency zone 1 improved at both visits [37115534]
  • SPLF graft refined since 2017 by lamination thickness, shape, extensions, added laminations and rib plaster; the authors call it a cornerstone of dorsal revision; Level V [42012848]
  • Secondary rhinoplasty after silicone implant, 56 patients at 1 year or more: implant, capsule and scar removed, dorsum rebuilt with cross-linked human acellular dermal matrix, tip with autogenous cartilage; 1 infection, 3 excessive resorption; modified ROE 31.7 preoperative, 77.3 at 6 months, 81.4 at 1 year (P<0.001) [36728206]
  • Molded glued diced costal cartilage after failed silicone augmentation, 28 patients, mean follow-up 18.3 months: 91.1% good or excellent; dorsal height +2.78%, radix +2.26%, nasal length +7.53%, tip projection +2.40%, axis deviation reduced 1.15 degrees; 2 complications (1 infection, 1 cosmetic dissatisfaction) [37289986]
  • Costal cartilage warping needing revision, 32 patients (29 women, mean age 32.5): an incompletely removed hump was identified as an external cause of sagittal warping; embed-in graft corrected the warp in every case [36656674]
  • Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction as adjuvant in 40 severely contracted noses (revision septorhinoplasty, randomized against saline): at 18 months nasal length 4.2 to 5.1 cm, tip projection 2.2 to 2.9 cm, nasolabial angle 105.8 to 94.9 degrees, gains larger than control; Level III [33620926]
  • Y-columellar strut from auricular cartilage, 37 patients (short wings for primary projection, long wings for iatrogenic alar deformity): nasolabial angle increased regardless of deformity type (P<0.00001); no negative outcomes in the revision subgroup [36729933]
  • Alar base lining graft to prevent and treat alar retraction, 42 patients at 1 year or more: no extrusion, no collapse, no major infection; alar contracture in secondary cases corrected [38346139]
  • Sequential alar base resection in 423 primary and secondary patients (Rio de Janeiro, 2019-2023): no technique-specific complication, minimal donor-site morbidity, ROE satisfactory [42554673]
  • Digital osteotomies in revision: prior lateral osteotomy lines can be recreated with finger pressure alone, sparing dead space and skeleton-to-soft-tissue attachments [36877619]
  • Psychiatric diagnosis and revision, 961 cosmetic rhinoplasty patients (1979-2024): 18% (24/135) with a psychiatric diagnosis had at least one revision versus 12% (95/826) without (p=0.04); age 46 or older and female sex predicted revision [40139802]
  • SCHNOS question 5 (decreased mood and self-esteem due to my nose), 148 cosmetic patients: scores 4 or 5 carried revision rates of 16.7% and 18.8% and revision-discussion rates of 27.8% and 31.25%; scores 0-3 carried 0% revision and 10.4% revision discussion; only Q5 predicted revision after Bonferroni correction [32856710]
  • Expectation versus satisfaction, prospective single-center: aesthetic patients expected 89.69 on a 100-point VAS and reported 72 to 79.79 across every interval to beyond 12 months; functional patients expected 17.98 and reported 29.59 to 31.43 [33337943]
  • Skin compromise after 384 open rhinoplasties (275 revision): 27 (7%) needed unplanned treatment, 92.6% of them revisions; older age (p<0.0001), smoking (p=0.027) and more prior surgeries (p=0.0002) raised risk; 44.4% resolved fully; revision rate in the compromised group 22.2% [33054380]
  • Biofilm and persister cells found in nasal soft tissue of 3 of 14 rhinoplasty patients, all revision cases with 1 to 6 prior operations and no implant [35724255]
  • Nasal skin sensation, 100 primary and 34 revision patients tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to 12 months: primary noses regained pressure sensation except at tip and infratip; revision noses stayed reduced at every point (P<0.001), most at tip, infratip and columellar base [33738466]
  • Secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with septal extension graft, 194 skeletally mature patients, 3D morphometry: bridge length, height, projection, dorsum and columellar angles increased; alar width and deviation decreased; nose moved toward but did not reach normative controls [37797231]
  • Secondary bilateral cleft rhinoplasty, 92 patients, bilateral reverse-U flap plus septal extension graft: columella, bridge, projection, tip definition and nostril orientation improved; complication rate 4%; upper lip deficiency unchanged [38314894]
  • Tajima reverse-U incision for secondary unilateral cleft nose, 96 patients with 5-year FACE-Q: nostril satisfaction 79.72 before, 85.95 at 1 week, 82.61 at 5 years; correction held in the 4-13 year group and in mild to moderate deformity [38967637]
  • Nasal obstruction after secondary cleft rhinoplasty (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2015-2021): composite NOSE improved (P<0.05); lateral crural strut grafting linked to less blockage, alar revision and tip sutures to worse specific symptoms, nasal stenting to less trouble breathing [36696324]

Techniques and terms named

PGS staging [27149684], tongue-in-groove [34550928], columellar strut [34550928], SPF-SPLF graft [40826294], diced cartilage in fascia (DCF) [40826294], rib lamination / rib plaster [40826294], spreader graft [28571072], lateral wall support [28571072], septoplasty [28571072], philtral flap [41731229], costal cartilage [41731229], hyaluronic acid filler skin expansion [42324394], saddle nose Types 1-4 [42324394], secondary liquid rhinoplasty / nonsurgical rhinoplasty [41124352], desmopressin (DDAVP) [40456991], computer imaging / morphing [26862968], 3D surface imaging [26862969], nasal sill classification [39572464], primary cleft rhinoplasty [36409217], SCHNOS [41731229], NOSE [28571072], ROE [29135891], TriNetX [41672725], fresh frozen homologous costal cartilage (FFHCC) [40674713], fresh frozen cadaveric rib [35511072], non-irradiated homologous costal cartilage (NIHCC) [32522045], lateral crural strut graft (LCSG) [40920505], lateral crural repositioning [37115534], rib plaster [42012848], cross-linked human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) [36728206], molded glued diced cartilage graft (GDCG) [37289986], embed-in graft [36656674], adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) [33620926], Y-columellar strut [36729933], alar base lining graft (ABLG) [38346139], sequential alar base resection (SABR) [42554673], digital osteotomy [36877619], septal extension graft [37797231], bilateral reverse-U flap [38314894], Tajima reverse-U incision [38967637], nasal stenting [36696324], SCHNOS question 5 [32856710], expectation and satisfaction VAS [33337943], skin compromise protocol [33054380], biofilm and persister cells [35724255], Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing [33738466], SNOT-22 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [40674713], FACE-Q [38967637]

Numbers to remember

  • 10.8% revision rate after open rhinoplasty; n=252 revisions analyzed [34550928]
  • 5% to 15% revision rate across the literature [27149684]
  • 91.3% of functional revisions traced to septal deviation or valve dysfunction [28571072]
  • 2.8% complications, 92% satisfaction in 1122 secondary filler cases [41124352]
  • Over 300 SPLF dorsal reconstructions with 0 warping and 0 infection [40826294]
  • Readmission RR 1.793 with preoperative serotonergic antidepressants (4917 vs 4917) [41672725]
  • 18% vs 12% revision with vs without a psychiatric diagnosis, n=961 [40139802]
  • 16.7% to 18.8% revision when SCHNOS Q5 scores 4-5, 0% when 0-3, n=148 [32856710]
  • 2.7% infection with fresh frozen rib in 226 revisions; 2.4% with FFHCC in 123 cases [35511072, 40674713]
  • 7% skin compromise after 384 open rhinoplasties, 92.6% of them revisions [33054380]
  • Modified ROE 31.7 to 81.4 at 1 year after ADM dorsal reconstruction, n=56 [36728206]

Numbers

Measure Value Population / study PMID
Revision rate after open rhinoplasty 10.8% 252 revisions analyzed, single center [34550928]
Revision rate, literature range 5% to 15% Review, PGS staging paper [27149684]
Revision rate with psychiatric diagnosis 18% vs 12% without (p=0.04) 961 cosmetic patients, 1979-2024 [40139802]
Revision rate by nasal self-esteem (SCHNOS Q5) 16.7% to 18.8% (score 4-5) vs 0% (score 0-3) 148 cosmetic patients [32856710]
Revision rate after skin compromise 22.2% 27 compromised cases of 384 open rhinoplasties [33054380]
Avoided revision after primary cleft rhinoplasty 43% to 100% at 6 years or more 25 articles, systematic review [36409217]
Complication rate, secondary filler rhinoplasty 2.8%, all minor and transient 1,122 patients, 6 months or more [41124352]
Infection, fresh frozen rib graft 2.7% (6/226); 2.3% cleared with antibiotics 226 revisions, 9 years [35511072]
Infection and resorption, FFHCC graft 2.4% infection, 0.8% resorption 123 rhinoplasties, mean 11 months [40674713]
Graft complications, non-irradiated homologous rib 3.6% (2.6% resorption, 1.0% infection, 0 warping) 100 grafts in 26 patients [32522045]
Infection and warping, SPLF dorsal graft 0 and 0 Over 300 revisions, 2021-2024 [40826294]
Complications, secondary bilateral cleft rhinoplasty 4% 92 patients, single surgeon [38314894]
Skin compromise after open rhinoplasty 7% (27/384); 92.6% were revisions 384 cases, 2015-2018 [33054380]
Complications after ADM dorsal reconstruction 1 infection, 3 excessive resorption of 56 56 patients, 1 year or more [36728206]
Complications, molded glued diced cartilage 2 of 28 (1 infection, 1 dissatisfaction) 28 post-silicone revisions, 18.3 months [37289986]
Septal perforation in saddle nose series 10% 60 patients, 2016-2023 [42324394]
30-day readmission with serotonergic antidepressants RR 1.793 (P=.01); bleeding RR 1.596 4,917 matched pairs [41672725]
Satisfaction, secondary filler rhinoplasty 92% 1,122 patients [41124352]
ROE after lateral crural strut graft 30.41 to 75.90 (P<0.001) 37 Asian secondary cases, 12 months or more [40920505]
Modified ROE after ADM dorsal reconstruction 31.7 to 77.3 (6 mo) to 81.4 (1 yr) 56 patients [36728206]
Good or excellent outcome, molded diced cartilage 91.1% 28 patients [37289986]
FACE-Q nostril satisfaction, Tajima technique 79.72 to 85.95 (1 wk) to 82.61 (5 yr) 96 secondary unilateral cleft patients [38967637]
ROE pooled improvement SMD 5.87 (95% CI 3.55-8.19) 8 observational studies, meta-analysis [29135891]
Aesthetic expectation vs satisfaction (VAS 0-100) 89.69 expected; 72 to 79.79 reported Prospective single-center cohort [33337943]
SCHNOS total change, FFHCC series -13.5 (P<0.001) 123 rhinoplasties [40674713]

What is still contested or missing

  • Desmopressin effect is statistically significant but "the clinical significance remains to be established" [40456991]
  • Primary cleft rhinoplasty evidence carries significant risk of bias in most studies; timing remains debated [36409217]
  • Pooled satisfaction heterogeneity I=100%; the 6-12 month estimate's CI spans -8.79 to 32.12 [29135891]
  • Philtral flap series is 14 patients; authors state further studies are needed [41731229]
  • Homologous rib series carry short mean follow-up (11 to 16 months) against a warping and resorption question that runs for years [40674713, 32522045]
  • Warping attributed to incomplete hump removal rests on 32 single-center cases; the embed-in graft is described as a rescue, not a routine graft [36656674]
  • Biofilm evidence is 3 positive samples of 14 [35724255]
  • SPLF refinements and digital osteotomies are technique descriptions, Level V [42012848, 36877619]
  • Secondary cleft series come from single surgeons in Taiwan and China; the 3D comparisons show the nose still differs from normal controls after surgery [37797231, 38314894]

Papers used

  • Battista RA et al.. Reconstructive Approach to Saddle Nose Deformity: A Diagnostic-Therapeutic Algorithm and the Preoperative Use of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Skin Expansion in Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 42324394. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-06108-3
  • Robotti E et al.. The Evolution of the SPF-SPLF Graft in Rebuilding the Dorsum in Revision Rhinoplasty-an Update in an Over 300 Case Series. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 40826294. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05160-9
  • Xia Y et al.. A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 39572464. DOI 10.1007/s00266-024-04526-9
  • Gutierrez RWH et al.. Preoperative Desmopressin for Bleeding Reduction During Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025. PMID 40456991. DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-04916-7
  • Zelko I et al.. Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Results, Growth Restriction, and Avoiding Secondary Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36409217. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009924
  • Sibar S et al.. Revision Rhinoplasty after Open Rhinoplasty: Lessons from 252 Cases and Analysis of Risk Factors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021. PMID 34550928. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008318
  • Yang F et al.. Evaluation of Preoperative and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018. PMID 29135891. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004102
  • Goudakos JK et al.. Revision Rhinoplasty: Retrospective Chart Review Analysis of Deformities and Surgical Maneuvers in Patients with Nasal Airway Obstruction-Five Years of Experience. Facial Plast Surg 2017. PMID 28571072. DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1598041
  • Lekakis G et al.. Evolution of Preoperative Rhinoplasty Consult by Computer Imaging. Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 26862968. DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1570125
  • Lekakis G et al.. Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and the Continuous Evolution of Preoperative and Postoperative Assessment in Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 26862969. DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1570122
  • Rodman R, Kridel R. A Staging System for Revision Rhinoplasty: A Review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016. PMID 27149684. DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0249
  • Zontag N et al.. Preoperative Serotonin Antidepressants Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Complications Following Rhinoplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41672725. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjag043
  • Valente DS, Zanella RK. Secondary Liquid Rhinoplasty: Challenges, Techniques, and Long-term Outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2026. PMID 41124352. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaf212
  • Bastaninejad S et al.. Columella Reconstruction Using the Philtral Flap in Patients with Columellar Deformity in Revision Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026. PMID 41731229. DOI 10.1007/s00266-026-05712-7
  • Taylor CM, Barrera JE. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Fresh Frozen Homologous Costal Cartilage in Primary, Revision, and Functional Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40674713. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012303
  • Rohrich RJ et al.. Fresh Frozen Rib Cartilage Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty: A 9-Year Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022. PMID 35511072. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009203
  • Rogal J et al.. Safety and Efficacy of Non- and Minimally Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021. PMID 32522045. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0031
  • Kook WS et al.. Versatile Usability of Lateral Crural Strut Graft for Correction of Various Nasal Tip Deformities in Secondary Rhinoplasty in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 40920505. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012423
  • Abdelhamid AS et al.. Patient Outcomes in Lateral Crural Repositioning and Reconstruction in Revision Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024. PMID 37115534. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0434
  • Robotti E et al.. Refining the SPLF Graft: Innovations in Revision Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 42012848. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013130
  • Kook WS et al.. Prevention and Resolution of Silicone Implant-Related Problems in Secondary Rhinoplasty Using a Cross-Linked Human Acellular Dermal Matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36728206. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010205
  • Fung CY et al.. Revision Rhinoplasty Using Glued Diced Costal Cartilage Shaped With Mold for Management of Complicated Silicone Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2023. PMID 37289986. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjad180
  • Xu Y et al.. Analysis of the Cause of Cartilage Warping in the Rhinoplasty of Costal Cartilage and Application of Embed-In Graft in Revisional Surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2023. PMID 36656674. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjad011
  • Ahn TH et al.. Use of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions in Revision Rhinoplasty for Severe Contractures in Asian Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021. PMID 33620926. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007623
  • Martino C et al.. Y-Columellar Strut Graft: A Method for Reconstructing the Nasal Tip in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36729933. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009993
  • Pozzi M et al.. Alar Base Lining Graft: A New Technique to Prevent and Correct Alar Retraction in Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 38346139. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011353
  • Pozzi M et al.. Sequential Alar Base Resection in Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2026. PMID 42554673. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013363
  • Lisiecki JL et al.. Revision Rhinoplasty Finesse with Digital Osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 36877619. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010362
  • Tie K et al.. Association Between Psychiatric Diagnoses and Revision Cosmetic Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2025. PMID 40139802. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0334
  • Okland TS et al.. Using Nasal Self-Esteem to Predict Revision in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2021. PMID 32856710. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa252
  • Kandathil CK et al.. Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021. PMID 33337943. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0406
  • Irvine LE et al.. Outcomes of a Treatment Protocol for Compromised Nasal Skin in Primary and Revision Open Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021. PMID 33054380. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0181
  • Kao WK et al.. Evidence of Biofilm and Persister Cell Formation in Revision Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022. PMID 35724255. DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0378
  • Akyigit A et al.. Comparison of Changes in Nasal Skin Sensation After Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty Procedures Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing. Aesthet Surg J 2021. PMID 33738466. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab139
  • Saito T et al.. Septal Extension Graft in Cleft Rhinoplasty: Patients with Secondary Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024. PMID 37797231. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011106
  • Saito T et al.. Secondary Bilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: Achieving an Aesthetic Result. Aesthet Surg J 2024. PMID 38314894. DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae019
  • Liu Y et al.. Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in Patients with Secondary Nasal Deformity: Optimal Indications for Tajima Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025. PMID 38967637. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011608
  • Carlson AR et al.. A Longitudinal Study of Improvement in Nasal Airway Obstruction after Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023. PMID 36696324. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009851

Written by rhinoplasty.cc, 2026-09-08, from the PubMed abstracts; not medical advice.

Start here

The 38 papers the synthesis above was written from.

  1. APS
    2026PMID 42324394Summary
  2. APS
    2026PMID 40826294Summary
  3. APS
    2025PMID 39572464Summary
  4. APS
    2025PMID 40456991Summary
  5. PRS
    2023PMID 36409217Summary
  6. PRS
    2021PMID 34550928Summary
  7. PRS
    2018PMID 29135891Summary
  8. FPS
    2017PMID 28571072Summary
  9. FPS
    2016PMID 26862968Summary
  10. FPS
    2016PMID 26862969Summary
  11. JAMA FPS
    2016PMID 27149684Summary
  12. ASJ
    2026PMID 41672725Summary
  13. ASJ
    2026PMID 41124352Summary
  14. APS
    2026PMID 41731229Summary
  15. PRS
    2026PMID 40674713Summary
  16. PRS
    2022PMID 35511072Summary
  17. FPSAM
    2021PMID 32522045Summary
  18. PRS
    2026PMID 40920505Summary
  19. FPSAM
    2024PMID 37115534Summary
  20. PRS
    Refining the SPLF Graft: Innovations in Revision Rhinoplasty
    Robotti E, De Bernardis R, Clauss A et al.
    2026PMID 42012848Summary
  21. PRS
    2023PMID 36728206Summary
  22. ASJ
    2023PMID 37289986Summary
  23. ASJ
    2023PMID 36656674Summary
  24. PRS
    2021PMID 33620926Summary
  25. PRS
    2023PMID 36729933Summary
  26. PRS
    2024PMID 38346139Summary
  27. PRS
    2026PMID 42554673Summary
  28. PRS
    2024PMID 36877619Summary
  29. FPSAM
    2025PMID 40139802Summary
  30. ASJ
    2021PMID 32856710Summary
  31. FPSAM
    2021PMID 33337943Summary
  32. FPSAM
    2021PMID 33054380Summary
  33. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35724255Summary
  34. ASJ
    2021PMID 33738466Summary
  35. PRS
    2024PMID 37797231Summary
  36. ASJ
    2024PMID 38314894Summary
  37. PRS
    2025PMID 38967637Summary
  38. PRS
    2023PMID 36696324Summary

Related topics

37

Rib, ear and septal grafts

37 of the 181 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
37

Anatomy and nasal analysis

37 of the 181 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
33

Cleft, trauma and reconstruction

33 of the 181 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic
27

Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology

27 of the 181 papers here also match this topic.

Open topic

Every paper, by year

181 papers. The 38 Start here papers are not repeated.

202627 papers · 9 above
  1. APS
    Current Predictors of Revision at Time of Primary Rhinoplasty
    Garbaccio NC, Smith JE, Schonebaum DI et al.
    PMID 41286173Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 41361149Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 41530561Summary
  4. APS
    Revision Rhinoplasty in Retrocolumellar Perforation
    Göde S, Aliyeva A, Apaydın MB et al.
    PMID 42082664Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 42298163Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 42580758Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 41412191Summary
  8. FPS
    PMID 40897332Summary
  9. FPSAM
    PMID 41934318
  10. FPSAM
    Rhinoplasty Revisions: Aesthetic Surgery as a Risk Factor
    Majeethia H, Gorelik D, Mehdi Z et al.
    PMID 41630385
  11. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091328Summary
  12. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091324Summary
  13. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091334Summary
  14. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091333Summary
  15. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091330Summary
  16. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091325Summary
  17. FPS Clin
    PMID 42091321Summary
  18. PRS-GO
    PMID 42028104Summary
202512 papers · 4 above
  1. APS
    PMID 38987315Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 40456990Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 39433615Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 40425156Summary
  5. PRS-GO
    PMID 40765688Full text
  6. PRS-GO
    PMID 40212098Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 41050978Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 40642259Summary
202413 papers · 5 above
  1. APS
    PMID 38839614Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 38148360Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 38379010Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 37626136Summary
  5. APS
    PMID 38693403Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty
    Liao D, Pereira N, Obayemi A Jr et al.
    PMID 37981415Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 39247573Summary
  8. PRS-GO
    PMID 39444535Summary
202313 papers · 6 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 36793242
  2. APS
    PMID 35606536Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 35794245
  4. APS
    PMID 36510019
  5. APS
    PMID 36038664Summary
  6. CPS
    PMID 36396253Summary
  7. FPS
    PMID 36100245Summary
202216 papers · 2 above
  1. APS
    PMID 35577970Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 35817877Full text
  3. APS
    PMID 34981155
  4. APS
    PMID 34585263Summary
  5. CPS
    PMID 34782128Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 34544174Summary
  7. FPSAM
    PMID 35724257
  8. PRS
    PMID 36067469
  9. PRS
    PMID 36067480
  10. PRS
    PMID 34936638
  11. PRS
    PMID 36166381
  12. PRS
    PMID 34855703
  13. PRS-GO
    PMID 36148029Summary
  14. PRS-GO
    PMID 36381488Summary
202117 papers · 7 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 33829246
  2. ASJ
    PMID 33231626
  3. APS
    PMID 33432390Summary
  4. APS
    PMID 33403421
  5. APS
    PMID 32997238Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 34270514Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 34550929
  8. PRS
    PMID 33764912
  9. PRS
    Secondary Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Nasal Deformity
    Rohrich RJ, Benkler M, Avashia YJ et al.
    PMID 34076624Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 34522571Summary
20207 papers
  1. APS
    PMID 32936331
  2. FPS
    PMID 32191956Summary
  3. FPSAM
    PMID 32380871Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 32459773Summary
  5. PRS
    PMID 32097325Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 32459772Summary
  7. PRS-GO
    PMID 32766052Summary
20195 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 30517591Summary
  2. APS
    PMID 31139910Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 30759459Summary
  4. PRS
    Role of Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Revision Rhinoplasty
    Mohan R, Shanmuga Krishnan RR, Rohrich RJ
    PMID 31461014Summary
  5. PRS-GO
    Unique Uses of SPY: Revision Rhinoplasty
    Amirlak B, Dehdashtian A, Sanneic K et al.
    PMID 31624661Summary
201812 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 29788068
  2. ASJ
    PMID 29394321Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 29857333Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 29857337Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 29857339Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    Grafting Techniques in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty
    Wong BJF, Friedman O, Hamilton GS 3rd
    PMID 29636151Summary
  7. JAMA FPS
    PMID 29710239
  8. JAMA FPS
    PMID 30326520Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 30252826
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 29464170Summary
  11. PRS-GO
    PMID 30349780Summary
20178 papers · 1 above
  1. ASJ
    PMID 29025221
  2. ASJ
    PMID 28472446Summary
  3. APS
    PMID 28341947Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 28571070Summary
  5. PRS
    PMID 28841603
  6. PRS
    PMID 28574946Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 29068924Summary
201613 papers · 3 above
  1. CPS
    PMID 26616707Summary
  2. CPS
    Revision Rhinoplasty
    Loyo M, Wang TD
    PMID 26616705Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 27494585Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 27494586Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 28033636Summary
  6. FPS Clin
    Controversies in Revision Rhinoplasty
    Rosenberger ES, Toriumi DM
    PMID 27400847Summary
  7. PRS
    Digital Imaging in Secondary Rhinoplasty
    Lehrman CR, Lee MR, Ramanadham S et al.
    PMID 27219263Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 26818276Summary
  9. PRS-GO
    PMID 27536492Summary
  10. PRS-GO
    PMID 27482502Summary
20153 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 25653241Summary
  2. JAMA FPS
    PMID 25719757Summary
  3. JAMA FPS
    PMID 26111006Summary
201412 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 25158684Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 25076457Summary
  3. FPS Clin
    PMID 24290995Summary
  4. JAMA FPS
    PMID 24201895Summary
  5. JAMA FPS
    PMID 24458140Summary
  6. PRS
    PMID 24374691
  7. PRS
    PMID 24776545Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 24374692
  9. PRS
    PMID 24776586
  10. PRS
    PMID 25415095Summary
  11. PRS
    PMID 24776585
  12. PRS-GO
    PMID 25289365Summary
201311 papers
  1. ASJ
    Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited
    Neaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH et al.
    PMID 23277618Summary
  2. ASJ
    PMID 23855009Summary
  3. ASJ
    PMID 23395883Summary
  4. PRS
    PMID 24076669
  5. PRS
    PMID 23358003
  6. PRS
    PMID 23783064Summary
  7. PRS
    PMID 24281624
  8. PRS
    PMID 23249985Summary
  9. PRS
    PMID 23714816
  10. PRS
    Secondary rhinoplasty: patients' expectations and operative goals
    Persichetti P, Gigliofiorito P, Del Buono R et al.
    PMID 23714815
  11. PRS
    PMID 23676971Summary
201210 papers
  1. FPS
    PMID 22872555Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 22872554Summary
  3. FPS
    PMID 22872560Summary
  4. FPS
    PMID 22872552Summary
  5. FPS
    PMID 22872553Summary
  6. FPS
    PMID 22872551
  7. FPS
    PMID 22872558Summary
  8. PRS
    PMID 22929252
  9. PRS
    PMID 22373979Summary
  10. PRS
    PMID 22575851Summary
20112 papers
  1. ASJ
    PMID 21908809Summary
  2. FPS
    PMID 22028013Summary