Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · 2025
Association Between Psychiatric Diagnoses and Revision Cosmetic Rhinoplasty
Tie K, Montañez-Azcarate V, Lin SJ.
What this paper says
Among 961 cosmetic rhinoplasty patients at one institution, 18 percent of those with a psychiatric diagnosis had at least one revision compared with 12 percent of those without.
Overview
Little evidence exists on how often patients with psychiatric diagnoses undergo revision cosmetic rhinoplasty. The authors queried adult patients at a single institution operated on between December 1979 and June 2024, excluding non-cosmetic cases and anyone with nasal trauma, tumour, cleft lip or palate, or a congenital nasal deformity. Patients were split by whether they carried a psychiatric diagnosis.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective single institution cohort study spanning about 45 years.
- The initial query found 1110 patients; 961 remained after exclusions, 135 with a psychiatric diagnosis and 826 without.
- The cohort was 75 percent female, 724 of 961, with a mean age of 48 years, standard deviation 15.
- Patients with at least one revision: 24 of 135, 18 percent, in the psychiatric group versus 95 of 826, 12 percent, in controls, p equal to 0.04.
- Age 46 or over and female gender were found to predict revision cosmetic rhinoplasty.
- Other stated outcomes were mean revisions per patient, satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty, and a breakdown by specific psychiatric diagnosis, none of which are reported in the abstract.
- Stated conclusion: patients with psychiatric diagnoses had higher revision rates.
What it means for a patient
- The difference is real but modest: roughly 1 in 5.5 versus 1 in 8 patients returning for a further operation.
- Age and sex also predicted revision, so a psychiatric diagnosis is one factor among several rather than the dominant one.
- Psychiatric diagnosis here is a broad category recorded in charts, not a specific condition such as body dysmorphic disorder.
- Limits: retrospective, one institution, records spanning 45 years during which practice changed substantially, and revisions performed elsewhere would not be captured.
Why this paper matters
Whether mental health history should influence candidacy for cosmetic surgery is contested, and most evidence concerns body dysmorphic disorder specifically. Measuring revision rates across all psychiatric diagnoses gives a broader picture. It cannot say whether the extra revisions were driven by the diagnosis or by other differences between the groups.
Terms
- Revision cosmetic rhinoplasty: a further operation to change the result of an earlier cosmetic one.
- Psychiatric diagnosis: any recorded mental health condition.
- Cohort study: research following defined groups and comparing their outcomes.
- Exclusion criteria: the rules determining which patients are left out of a study.
- Congenital nasal deformity: an abnormality of nasal shape present from birth.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Limited evidence exists regarding the incidence of revision cosmetic rhinoplasty in patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Objective: To assess the rate of revision cosmetic rhinoplasty in patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Methods: Adult patients at a single institution who underwent rhinoplasty were queried between…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- APS A Novel Classification of Nasal Sill Morphology Provides Strategies for Secondary Cleft RhinoplastyXia Y, Yuan J, Wang Z et al.2025PMID 39572464Summary
- APS Effect of Medical Ozone Therapy in Preventing Compromised Nasal Skin in Revision RhinoplastyAlp A, Polat E, Yenigun A et al.2025PMID 38987315Summary
- APS Preoperative Desmopressin for Bleeding Reduction During Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsGutierrez RWH, Gobbo HR, Fujimura Júnior AY et al.2025PMID 40456991Summary
- APS Revision Rhinoplasty After Non-Surgical Filler in East Asian Patients: A Safe and Effective Surgical ApproachYe J, Wang X, Zhao H et al.2025PMID 40456990Summary
- APS Wide-Based Columellar Strut Graft: A Novel Boost for Enhanced Nasal Tip Support in Ethnic and Revision RhinoplastySoylu E, Yenigun A, Demirhan H et al.2025PMID 39433615Summary
- FPS 2025PMID 40425156Summary
- PRS Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in Patients with Secondary Nasal Deformity: Optimal Indications for Tajima TechniqueLiu Y, Zhang C, Yao M et al.2025PMID 38967637Summary
- PRS-GO Frozen Cadaveric Rib Grafts in Primary or Revision Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisBohler F, Koenig ZA, Chaiyasate K2025PMID 40765688Full text