rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · 2022

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2022

Re-Evaluating the Effect of Preoperative Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss and Field Quality During Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial

Afzali SL, Panahi H, Ganji F, Ziaei S, Sedaghat N.

What this paper says

In a double blinded randomized trial of 80 patients, tranexamic acid produced only a statistically insignificant reduction in blood loss during rhinoplasty compared with placebo.

Overview

Bleeding during surgery is one of the main complicating factors in rhinoplasty, and previous trials reported that tranexamic acid reduces it. This trial re evaluated the drug's effect on blood loss during surgery and on the surgeon's view of the operating field. Patients were randomized and blinded, with the intervention group receiving 10 mg per kg of the drug and the placebo group an equal volume of normal saline.

Sections of note

  • Randomized placebo controlled trial, registered as IRCT20111219008458N2; level of evidence I.
  • Data from 80 patients were gathered and analysed.
  • Blood loss was measured as the total volume collected by suction and gauze minus the irrigation fluid used.
  • Surgical field quality was measured by surgeon satisfaction on a 5 point scale.
  • Demographics, blood clotting measures and clinical data were collected and used as covariates.
  • Blood loss was insignificantly lower in the drug group, mean difference minus 3.6, 95 percent confidence interval minus 19.19 to 11.99, P equals 0.65.
  • Surgeon satisfaction was insignificantly higher in the drug group, mean difference 0.18, 95 percent confidence interval minus 0.11 to 0.46, P equals 0.22.
  • Results were confirmed by multivariable analysis.

What it means for a patient

  • The drug did not measurably reduce bleeding during surgery in this trial, contrary to most earlier studies.
  • The confidence interval for blood loss spans zero widely, so a real effect in either direction has not been ruled out.
  • Eighty patients is a modest sample for detecting a moderate effect.
  • The authors state further studies are needed to estimate the drug's effect more precisely.

Why this paper matters

Tranexamic acid is given routinely by many rhinoplasty surgeons on the basis of earlier trials. This randomized double blinded study, the strongest design available, finds no significant benefit. Whether the drug helps in specific circumstances or at other doses remains open.

Terms

  • Tranexamic acid: a drug that slows the breakdown of blood clots, used to reduce bleeding.
  • Placebo: an inactive substance given for comparison, here normal saline.
  • Double blinded: neither the patient nor the assessor knows which treatment was given.
  • Surgical field quality: how clearly the surgeon can see the operating site, reduced by bleeding.
  • Confidence interval: the range within which the true effect is likely to lie.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, minimizing the surgical complications of rhinoplasty has gained more importance. Results from previous trials show that Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces intraoperative bleeding, one of the major complicating factors during rhinoplasty.

Objective: To contribute to previous evidence by re-evaluating the efficacy of TXA, specifically in reducing intraoperative blood loss and increasing surgical field quality in rhinoplasty.

Study Design And Methods: A randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted (IRCT20111219008458N2). The outcomes included total intraoperative blood loss, measured by the total volume of fluid collected by suction and gauzes, subtracted by volume of used irrigation fluids, and the quality of surgical field, measured by surgeon's satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale. Demographics, blood coagulation measures, and clinical data were also collected and were held as covariates in analysis. After blinding, randomization, and group allocations, the intervention group received TXA 10mg/kg and the placebo group normal saline in equal volumes.

Results: Data of a total of 80 patients were gathered and analyzed. The total intraoperative blood loss was insignificantly lower (mean difference [95% CI]:  - 3.6 ( - 19.19, 11.99), P = 0.65) and surgeon's satisfaction was insignificantly higher (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.18 ( - 0.11, 0.46), P = 0.22) in TXA group. Results were confirmed by multivariable analysis.

Conclusion: In contrast to most of the previous studies, this study showed only a statistically insignificant decrease in total intraoperative blood loss in patients receiving TXA compared to placebo. Further studies are required to more precisely estimate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss during rhinoplasty.

Level Of Evidence: LEVEL I, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. APS
    2022PMID 35577970Summary
  2. APS
    2022PMID 35817877Full text
  3. APS
    2022PMID 34981155
  4. CPS
    2022PMID 34782128Summary
  5. FPS
    2022PMID 34544174Summary
  6. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35724257
  7. FPSAM
    2022PMID 35724255Summary
  8. PRS
    2022PMID 36067469