Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2021
Differences between Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: Indications, Techniques, Grafts, and Outcomes
Hacker S, Pollock J, Gubisch W, Haack S.
What this paper says
Comparing 153 first time and 92 revision rhinoplasties at one specialist clinic, a further revision was needed in 10.5 percent of primary cases and 23.9 percent of revision cases.
Overview
The authors note that rhinoplasty demand has risen with selfies and social media, and that demand for corrective surgery has risen with it. Revision rhinoplasty is more complex than a first operation and often needs grafting material from outside the nose. This retrospective analysis compared indications, techniques and outcomes between the two groups at a specialized facial plastic surgery clinic, all patients treated by an experienced surgeon under established clinic standards.
Sections of note
- Retrospective analysis of 245 patients: 153 primary cases and 92 revisions; therapeutic level of evidence IV.
- More revision patients sought surgery for appearance alone than for breathing alone.
- Almost two thirds of revision patients had combined appearance and breathing problems.
- Complex reconstructive techniques were used more often in revision cases.
- Extracorporeal septoplasty, in which the septum is removed, rebuilt and replaced, was more common in revisions.
- Grafts from outside the nose were also more common in revisions.
- A further revision during follow up occurred in 10.5 percent of primary cases and 23.9 percent of revision cases, P equals 0.006.
- The authors state patients should be told about the greater complexity, the possible need for grafts from outside the nose, and the higher risk of another revision.
What it means for a patient
- A second operation is more than twice as likely to need a third than a first operation is to need a second.
- Revision surgery usually means taking cartilage from the ear or rib, since septal cartilage is often already used.
- Most revision patients had both breathing and appearance complaints rather than appearance alone.
- This is one clinic's retrospective data, and the follow up period is not stated in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
Revision rates are the most concrete measure of rhinoplasty outcome, and this study separates them by whether the nose had been operated on before. It quantifies the escalation patients face. Which factors within revision surgery drive the higher rate is not identified.
Terms
- Primary rhinoplasty: a first operation on a nose with no previous surgery.
- Revision rhinoplasty: surgery on a nose that has already been operated on.
- Extracorporeal septoplasty: removing the septum, rebuilding it outside the nose and replacing it.
- Extranasal graft: grafting material taken from outside the nose, such as ear or rib.
- Functional problem: a breathing problem, as distinct from appearance.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The nose is at the center of the face and has essential functional and aesthetic properties. Over recent years, rhinoplasty has gained increasing popularity through the influence of "selfies" and social media. As a result, a growing demand for secondary correction has also emerged. Revision rhinoplasty is more complex…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
181 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2021.
- ASJ Commentary on: Comparison of Changes in Nasal Skin Sensation After Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty Procedures Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament TestingBlau JA, Marcus JR2021PMID 33829246
- ASJ 2021PMID 33231626
- ASJ Comparison of Changes in Nasal Skin Sensation After Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty Procedures Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament TestingAkyigit A, Keleş E, Yıldırım YSS et al.2021PMID 33738466Summary
- ASJ Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Dutch FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Questionnaires Using Rasch AnalysisDeclau F, Pingnet L, Verkest V et al.2021PMID 33945612Summary
- ASJ Using Nasal Self-Esteem to Predict Revision in Cosmetic RhinoplastyOkland TS, Patel P, Liu GS et al.2021PMID 32856710Summary
- APS Awareness of Facial Asymmetry and Its Impact on Postoperative Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty PatientSözen T, Dizdar D, Göksel A2021PMID 32974739Summary
- APS Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Rhinoplasty Candidates: Prevalence and Functional Correlationsde Souza TSC, Patrial MTCRO, Meneguetti AFC et al.2021PMID 32875438Summary
- APS Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-experimental Study by the Aid of ROE and RHINO QuestionnairesHaddady Abianeh S, Moradi Bajestani S, Rahmati J et al.2021PMID 32747985Summary