Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2021
Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Dutch FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Questionnaires Using Rasch Analysis
Declau F, Pingnet L, Verkest V, Hansen T.
What this paper says
Testing the Dutch FACE-Q nose and nostril scales in 100 septorhinoplasty patients, the analysis found the Dutch and English versions produced identical conversion results.
Overview
The English FACE-Q rhinoplasty module was built using Rasch measurement theory and has been translated into Dutch. Before results from the Dutch version can be interpreted, it must also fit the Rasch model. The study evaluated whether the Dutch and English versions are equivalent across cultures by applying that methodology to a prospective consecutive cohort of Dutch speaking patients.
Sections of note
- Rasch analysis performed with Winsteps software on data from 100 consecutive Dutch speaking septorhinoplasty patients.
- The FACE-Q nose and nostrils scales were evaluated.
- New Dutch conversion tables were constructed and compared with the original English ones.
- Psychometric cross validation was performed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
- Both questionnaires adequately met the requirement of invariance.
- Some issues with item and person fit were found within an acceptable range, along with some local item dependency and differential item functioning.
- Comparison of the Dutch and English conversion tables by ROC analysis showed identical results for both scales.
- The authors conclude the Dutch version corresponds conceptually to the English original.
What it means for a patient
- Scores from the Dutch questionnaire can be read the same way as scores from the English one.
- This matters for comparing rhinoplasty results between countries and pooling them in research.
- The analysis found minor imperfections in how some items behaved, though within an acceptable range.
- This study evaluates a measuring instrument, not any surgical technique or outcome.
Why this paper matters
Patient reported outcome scores are only comparable across languages if the translated instrument measures the same construct on the same scale. This study applies a formal statistical test rather than relying on translation alone. Whether the remaining item level irregularities matter in practice is not resolved.
Terms
- FACE-Q: a family of validated questionnaires measuring patient reported results after facial procedures.
- Rasch analysis: a statistical method testing whether questionnaire items measure a single underlying trait consistently.
- Invariance: the property that a scale behaves the same way across different groups.
- Differential item functioning: when a question behaves differently for one group than another.
- ROC analysis: a method comparing how well two measures classify the same outcome.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The English version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module, developed according to Rasch measurement theory, has recently been translated into Dutch. Before conclusions can be drawn from the Dutch version, this translation must also fit the item analysis by the Rasch model. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2021.
- ASJ 3D Virtual Planning for Rhinoplasty Using a Free Add-On for Open-Source SoftwareSobral DS, Duarte DW, Dornelles RFV et al.2021PMID 33581695Summary
- ASJ Commentary on: 3D Virtual Planning for Rhinoplasty Using a Free Add-On for Open-Source SoftwareLekakis G2021PMID 33675636
- ASJ Commentary on: The Value of Averageness in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Humans Like Average NosesSarwer DB2021PMID 33590830Full text
- ASJ Rhinoplasty: Aesthetic Augmentation With Improvement of Dorsal Aesthetic LinesZholtikov V, Golovatinskii V, Ouerghi R et al.2021PMID 33674857Summary
- APS 3D Printed Surgical Guides Applied in Rhinoplasty to Help Obtain Ideal Nasal ProfileGordon AR, Schreiber JE, Patel A et al.2021PMID 34075458Summary
- APS Airflow Considerations and the Effect of Webster's Triangle in Reduction RhinoplastyKamburoglu HO, Bitik O, Vargel İ2021PMID 33598741Summary
- APS Application of Three-Dimensional Imaging in Asian Rhinoplasty with Costal CartilageLi W, Liang Y, Sun Y et al.2021PMID 33432387Summary
- APS Awareness of Facial Asymmetry and Its Impact on Postoperative Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty PatientSözen T, Dizdar D, Göksel A2021PMID 32974739Summary