rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2021

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2021

3D Printed Surgical Guides Applied in Rhinoplasty to Help Obtain Ideal Nasal Profile

Gordon AR, Schreiber JE, Patel A, Tepper OM.

What this paper says

In 15 patients operated on with 3D printed guides made from a preoperative simulation, the final tip sat an average of 0.8 mm from the simulated projection and 0.3 mm from the simulated rotation.

Overview

Computer simulation is increasingly used in rhinoplasty consultation, and the authors argue its value extends past converting patients into surgery. Simulated results can guide planning and decisions during the operation itself. This study evaluated 3D printed guides, made from those simulations, as an intraoperative reference for setting bridge height and tip position.

Sections of note

  • Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria; the journal assigns level of evidence V.
  • Each patient had a preoperative virtual 3D surgical simulation.
  • Simulations were used to make a printed nasal kit containing ceramic models of the current and simulated nose, a sagittal contour guide and a custom postoperative splint.
  • Guides were sterilized so the profile contour could be checked repeatedly during surgery.
  • Postoperative 3D images taken at 1 to 3 months were compared with the preoperative simulations.
  • Differences in the z and y coordinates were used to measure differences in projection and rotation.
  • Final tip position averaged 0.8 plus or minus 0.7 mm from simulated projection and 0.3 plus or minus 0.2 mm from simulated rotation.
  • Projection of the cartilage and bony parts of the bridge was within 1.0 plus or minus 0.8 mm and 0.8 plus or minus 0.7 mm of the simulation.

What it means for a patient

  • The guides let the surgeon check during surgery whether the nose matches the plan shown before it.
  • Final results fell within roughly a millimetre of the simulation on every measurement.
  • Fifteen patients with no control group cannot show the guides caused that accuracy.
  • Follow up imaging at 1 to 3 months is early, since swelling and settling continue after that.

Why this paper matters

Simulation is commonly shown to patients as an expectation setting tool, and the gap between simulation and result drives dissatisfaction. This study measures that gap directly with a method for closing it. Whether accuracy at 1 to 3 months persists, and whether patients notice the difference, is untested.

Terms

  • 3D printed surgical guide: a physical template printed from a digital plan and used during surgery.
  • Virtual simulation: a digital preview of the intended surgical result.
  • Projection: how far the tip or bridge stands out from the face.
  • Rotation: how far upward or downward the tip is angled.
  • Sagittal contour: the profile outline of the nose viewed from the side.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“As computer simulation for rhinoplasty continues to rise, the technology's utility extends beyond increasing patient conversion. Virtual simulation of the surgical result can assist with surgical planning and intraoperative decision-making. 3D printed anatomic models or surgical guides based on 3D images may help…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2021
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2021.

  1. ASJ
    2021PMID 33581695Summary
  2. ASJ
    2021PMID 33675636
  3. ASJ
    2021PMID 33590830Full text
  4. ASJ
    2021PMID 33945612Summary
  5. ASJ
    2021PMID 33674857Summary
  6. APS
    2021PMID 33598741Summary
  7. APS
    2021PMID 33432387Summary
  8. APS
    2021PMID 33758978