rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2021

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2021

Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes After Open Rhinoplasty: A Quasi-experimental Study by the Aid of ROE and RHINO Questionnaires

Haddady Abianeh S, Moradi Bajestani S, Rahmati J, Shahrbaf MA, Fatehi Meybodi A.

What this paper says

Six months after open rhinoplasty at an Iranian referral centre, average ROE scores rose from 51.3 to 79.6 and RHINO scores from 64.1 to 83.4, both statistically significant changes.

Overview

Rhinoplasty is performed at a high rate in Iran. The study measured appearance and breathing outcomes using two questionnaires, the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation and the Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes. Patients attending the plastic surgery clinic of the Imam Khomeini hospital complex between 2017 and 2019 who underwent open rhinoplasty completed both questionnaires before surgery and again six months afterward.

Sections of note

  • Prospective quasi experimental study; the journal assigns level of evidence IV.
  • Both questionnaires were completed before surgery and at 6 months.
  • ROE score rose from 51.27 plus or minus 10.54 to 79.6 plus or minus 9.67, P less than 0.001.
  • RHINO score rose from 64.13 plus or minus 11.43 to 83.36 plus or minus 11.03, P less than 0.001.
  • Outcomes were examined across age groups, genders and educational levels.
  • The commonest reasons for satisfaction were the nose feeling more natural, 62 percent of patients, and good tip rotation, 32 percent.
  • The commonest reasons for dissatisfaction were the nose being too wide, 25 percent, and a bulbous tip, 25 percent.

What it means for a patient

  • Scores improved substantially on both scales, so most patients rated the result better than their starting point.
  • A quarter of patients still named the nose too wide, and a quarter named a rounded tip, as complaints after surgery.
  • There was no control group and no comparison of surgical techniques, so the improvement cannot be attributed to any particular method.
  • Follow up was six months, which is short for a nose that continues to change with healing.

Why this paper matters

Patient reported outcome measures are now the standard way to judge rhinoplasty, and this study applies two of them in a high volume national setting. It quantifies both the improvement and the residual complaints. The abstract does not state the number of patients, which limits how much weight the figures carry.

Terms

  • Open rhinoplasty: surgery through a small incision across the columella, lifting the skin for direct view.
  • ROE: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, a short questionnaire on satisfaction with the nose.
  • RHINO: Rhinoplasty Health Inventory and Nasal Outcomes, covering appearance and breathing.
  • Quasi experimental: a before and after study without random assignment or a control group.
  • Bulbous tip: a wide, rounded nasal tip.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background And Aims: Rhinoplasty is one of the common plastic surgery procedures which has a high rate in Iran. There are several tools for assessing the outcomes and quality of life after this surgical procedure which rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire and rhinoplasty health inventory and nasal outcomes are two of them. The aim of this study was to investigate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty by the aid of ROE and RHINO scales in patients who presented to a referral center in Iran.

Materials And Methods: This prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed on patients who referred to the plastic surgery clinic of Imam Khomeini hospital complex during 2017 to 2019 and underwent open rhinoplasty. ROE and RHINO questionnaires were filled by patients before and 6 months after the surgery. Surgical outcomes and aesthetic satisfaction rate were evaluated in different age groups, genders and educational levels. The data were analyzed by version 21 of SPSS software.

Results: ROE score increased from 51.27 ± 10.54 to 79.6 ± 9.67 (P < 0.001). In addition, RHINO score increased from 64.13 ± 11.43 to 83.36 ± 11.03 (P < 0.001). The most common satisfaction factors among patients in this study were "nose feels more natural" in 62% of patients and "tip rotation is good" in 32% of patients. Furthermore, the most common causes of dissatisfaction in patients were "nose too wide" in 25% of patients and "tip bulbous" in 25% of patients.

Conclusion: ROE and RHINO scales are effective for assessing rhinoplasty outcomes. The satisfaction rate of rhinoplasty is high in Iran and is related to the natural shape of the nose in addition to the tip rotation.

Level Of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2021
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2021.

  1. ASJ
    2021PMID 33581695Summary
  2. ASJ
    2021PMID 33675636
  3. ASJ
    2021PMID 33590830Full text
  4. ASJ
    2021PMID 33945612Summary
  5. ASJ
    2021PMID 33564830Summary
  6. ASJ
    2021PMID 33674857Summary
  7. APS
    2021PMID 34075458Summary
  8. APS
    2021PMID 33649928Summary