rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2014

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2014

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty: impact on self-esteem and quality of life

Roosenboom J, Hellings PW, Picavet VA, Prokopakis EP, Antonis Y, Schoenaers J, Poorten VV, Claes P, Hens G.

What this paper says

In 33 patients born with a cleft lip, secondary cleft rhinoplasty raised satisfaction with nasal shape and breathing at one year and lowered appearance-related psychological distress.

Overview

Most rhinoplasty outcome papers report what surgeons see in photographs rather than what patients feel. This study asked whether patients born with a cleft lip judge their own result the same way surgeons do, and whether the operation changes distress about appearance and general quality of life. Thirty-three patients were assessed before surgery and again one year after secondary cleft rhinoplasty.

Sections of note

  • Patients rated nasal shape and nasal function on a visual analogue scale and completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.
  • Nasal and sinus symptoms were measured with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, distress about appearance with the Derriford Appearance Scale, and daily-life impairment with the Sheehan Disability Scale.
  • Two independent surgeons scored before and after photographs.
  • Shape scores improved (p less than 0.0001) and function scores improved (p = 0.005). Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores improved (p less than 0.0001).
  • Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores fell (p = 0.006), appearance distress fell (p less than 0.0001), and quality of life rose (p = 0.01).
  • Patient ratings did not correlate with the surgeons' photographic scores.

What it means for a patient

  • Cleft-related nose surgery improved both how patients felt about their nose and how well they breathed at one year.
  • Benefit extended past the nose itself into everyday confidence and functioning.
  • Surgeon photograph scores did not track patient opinion, so a result graded well by a professional may not be the result the patient values.
  • Follow-up stopped at 12 months and there was no comparison group, so longer-term durability is unknown.

Why this paper matters

Cleft rhinoplasty is a staged, technically difficult reconstruction, and this study measures it by the standard that matters to the person having it. The gap between patient and surgeon scoring supports using patient-reported questionnaires in routine practice. Durability beyond one year remains unanswered.

Terms

  • Secondary cleft rhinoplasty: surgery to reshape the nose after an earlier cleft lip repair.
  • Visual analogue scale: a sliding 0 to 100 rating a patient marks themselves.
  • Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation: a short questionnaire scoring satisfaction with nasal appearance and breathing.
  • Sino-Nasal Outcome Test: a questionnaire measuring nose and sinus symptoms.
  • Correlation: a statistical measure of whether two sets of scores move together.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging facial plastic procedures. Although patient satisfaction is the real outcome parameter in rhinoplasty, most authors have studied objective outcomes evaluated by professionals. The purpose of this study was to determine patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty in patients born…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2014
Authors
9
Type
Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2014.

  1. ASJ
    2014PMID 25158684Summary
  2. ASJ
    2014PMID 25028737Summary
  3. APS
    2014PMID 24357194Summary
  4. APS
    2014PMID 24902906Summary
  5. FPS
    2014PMID 24918702Summary
  6. FPS
    2014PMID 24918706Summary
  7. FPS
    Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty
    Zojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR et al.
    2014PMID 25397717Summary
  8. FPS
    2014PMID 25076457Summary