Journal archive · Nasal tip · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2014
Open rhinoplasty concepts in facilitating tip reconstruction
Carminati M, Robotti E.
What this paper says
This article argues that reshaping the nasal framework at the same time as repairing a skin cancer defect shrinks the hole that has to be covered, so smaller flaps and smaller scars are needed.
Overview
The nose is a common site for skin cancer, and most defects after removal are wide but shallow. Covering a wide defect needs a large flap, which leaves noticeable scars at both the donor and the recipient site. The authors point out that skin cancer patients are usually older, with typical aged nose features, and that reducing the framework can reduce the amount of skin needed.
Sections of note
- Concept and technique article. No patient numbers, outcomes, follow-up or complication rates are reported.
- The nose accounts for roughly 26 percent of facial basal cell carcinomas and roughly 13 percent of the squamous cell cancers described in the abstract as spinal cell carcinomas.
- Melanoma, mostly lentigo maligna melanoma, is also frequently located on the nasal pyramid.
- Defects vary in size and depth and some involve all three layers of the nose, but most stay superficial and rarely invade the underlying framework.
- Aged noses are described as commonly showing a plunging tip, increased length and a prominent hump.
- Reducing and reshaping the framework downsizes the defect, so less skin is needed for coverage.
- The open rhinoplasty approach makes these manoeuvres easier, and they are largely the same as in cosmetic work.
What it means for a patient
- Reconstruction after nose skin cancer can include reshaping the nose itself, not only covering the wound.
- Doing so can mean a smaller flap and less scarring than covering the defect at its original size.
- No results are reported here, so there is no measured comparison against covering the defect without framework reduction.
- The concept applies mainly to older patients whose noses have lengthened and dropped with age.
Why this paper matters
It links cosmetic rhinoplasty technique to cancer reconstruction, two fields usually kept separate. Unanswered is how often defect downsizing is achievable, how much it reduces flap size in practice, and whether the reshaped nose satisfies patients.
Terms
- Basal cell carcinoma: the most common and least aggressive form of skin cancer.
- Lentigo maligna melanoma: a slow growing melanoma arising in sun damaged skin.
- Flap: skin moved from a nearby area, with its blood supply, to cover a wound.
- Nasal framework: the bone and cartilage giving the nose its shape.
- Plunging tip: a nasal tip that has dropped downward, typical with age.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The nose is a frequent site for skin cancer, accounting for approximately 26% of basal cell carcinomas and approximately 13% of spinal cell carcinomas of the facial district. Also melanomas, mostly as lentigo maligna melanomas, are frequently located at the nasal pyramid. Although defects can be of varying size and…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Nasal tip
200 papers on this topic.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
171 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2014.
- ASJ Rhinoplasty: the lateral crura-alar ringDaniel RK, Palhazi P, Gerbault O et al.2014PMID 24682443Summary
- ASJ Surface Aesthetics in Tip Rhinoplasty: A Step-by-Step GuideÇakır B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK2014PMID 24936094Summary
- ASJ The lateral crural rein flap: a novel technique for management of tip rotation in primary rhinoplastyKuran I, Öreroğlu AR, Efendioğlu K2014PMID 25028737Summary
- ASJ The sandwiched lateral crural reinforcement graft: a novel technique for lateral crus reinforcement in rhinoplastyKuran I, Oreroğlu AR2014PMID 24604789Summary
- APS Are grafts necessary in rhinoplasty? Cartilage flaps with cartilage-saving rhinoplasty conceptKüçüker I, Özmen S, Kaya B et al.2014PMID 24357194Summary
- APS Closed rhinoplasty with open approach advantages: extended intranasal incisions and tip rearrangement suturesKamburoğlu HO, Kayıkçıoğlu AU2014PMID 24902907Summary
- APS Interdomal-columellar myolipoma: discovered at rhinoplastyFinocchi V, Pellini E, Longobardi G et al.2014PMID 24414116Summary
- APS Open rhinoplasty: influence of incisions, alar resection, and columellar strut on final appearance of the tipAbbou R, Bruant-Rodier C, Wilk A et al.2014PMID 25303879Summary