Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · Adolescent and aging nose · 2016
Digital Imaging in Secondary Rhinoplasty
Lehrman CR, Lee MR, Ramanadham S, Rohrich RJ.
What this paper says
Across 40 secondary rhinoplasty patients, results matched the preoperative digital simulation best at the nasal base, average 2.99, and least well at the nasal tip, average 2.27.
Overview
Computer imaging is widely used to show patients what a first-time rhinoplasty might achieve, but little was known about its role in secondary surgery, which is more complex. The authors reviewed 40 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients operated by one surgeon between January 2000 and August 2013, grading how closely the result matched both the preoperative photographs and the simulation.
Sections of note
- Retrospective review, 40 consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria, 35 women (87.5 percent) and five men (12.5 percent).
- Degree of improvement was graded against both preoperative photographs and the software simulation, using a graded scale.
- Two observers scored each region. Average ratings: nasal dorsum 2.36, midvault 2.65, nasal tip 2.27, nasal alae 2.63, nasal base 2.99.
- The nasal base scored highest and the nasal tip lowest.
- The authors conclude digital imaging gives a reasonable expectation for secondary rhinoplasty patients.
- They add that it must be used cautiously, because these patients have heightened expectations and anatomy altered unpredictably by earlier surgery. Level of evidence 4, therapeutic.
What it means for a patient
- Simulations are a communication tool rather than a promise, and this study puts numbers on how closely they were matched.
- The tip and the bridge, the two features patients most often focus on, were the hardest to predict, and the authors say this should be discussed before surgery.
- In a revision case the surgeon cannot know exactly what remains inside the nose until it is opened, which is why prediction is harder.
- Single surgeon, retrospective, no patient-reported satisfaction, and the abstract does not state what the grading scale ran from or to.
Why this paper matters
Showing a patient a simulated result shapes their expectations, and revision patients are described as already having heightened ones. Quantifying which regions the simulation predicts well is directly useful in consultation. Whether showing the image improves or worsens eventual satisfaction is not tested.
Terms
- Secondary rhinoplasty: an operation on a nose that has been operated on before.
- Digital imaging or morphing: digitally altering a photograph to show an intended result.
- Nasal dorsum: the bridge of the nose.
- Midvault: the middle third of the nose, between the bones and the tip.
- Nasal alae: the outer wings of the nostrils.
- Nasal base: the bottom of the nose where it meets the lip.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty remains one of the most commonly performed operations in plastic surgery. Little is known regarding the use of imaging in secondary rhinoplasty. Secondary rhinoplasty is a far more complex operation than primary rhinoplasty. The objective of this study was to assess the role of software imaging in patients…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
181 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Adolescent and aging nose
28 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media AnalysisKhansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD2016PMID 26063834Summary
- ASJ Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Short-Term Edema and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisCoroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al.2016PMID 26773090Summary
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS 2016PMID 26616707Summary
- CPS Revision RhinoplastyLoyo M, Wang TD2016PMID 26616705Summary
- CPS Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical PearlsPeng GL, Nassif PS2016PMID 26616712Summary