rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · 2016

CPS Clinics in Plastic Surgery · 2016

Revision Rhinoplasty

Loyo M, Wang TD.

What this paper says

A review of why patients seek revision rhinoplasty and what is found when they do, drawn from the senior author's 30 years of rhinoplasty practice and a survey of the literature.

Overview

Revision rhinoplasty is described as one of the most demanding operations a facial plastic surgeon performs, because the nose is a three-dimensional structure of interlocking cartilage, bone and soft tissue and because a failed result carries psychological weight for the patient. The article reviews common motivations for seeking revision and the anatomical findings that accompany them.

Sections of note

  • The article is a review chapter drawing on one surgeon's 30-year experience plus a literature review.
  • It covers common motivations that bring patients back for revision.
  • It covers the anatomical findings associated with those motivations.
  • The authors note the nose's central position on the face gives it disproportionate weight in overall facial harmony.
  • The interplay of cartilage, bone and soft tissue is presented as the reason revision is technically difficult.
  • No patient numbers, revision rates, complication rates or outcome data appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Wanting a revision usually reflects a specific anatomical problem that can be named, not simply a vague dissatisfaction.
  • Scarred tissue and previously removed cartilage make a second operation harder than the first and often require grafts from elsewhere.
  • The psychological weight of a disappointing result is acknowledged as part of the clinical picture rather than separate from it.
  • With no data in the abstract, this cannot indicate how often revision succeeds or which problems are most correctable.

Why this paper matters

Revision rates after rhinoplasty are widely quoted in the range of several percent, so a substantial number of patients face this operation. Systematising why they return is the starting point for reducing that number. Because the source is one surgeon's experience plus a narrative literature review, the frequencies described are not measured.

Terms

  • Revision rhinoplasty: an operation to correct the result of previous nasal surgery.
  • Facial plastic surgeon: a surgeon specialising in operations on the face, from either a plastic surgery or an ear, nose and throat background.
  • Facial harmony: how the features of a face relate to one another in proportion.
  • Soft tissue: the skin, fat and lining covering the nasal framework.
  • Anatomic finding: a structural problem identified on examination or during surgery.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Revision rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging operations the facial plastic surgeon performs given the complex 3-dimensional anatomy of the nose and the psychological impact it has on patients. The intricate interplay of cartilages, bone, and soft tissue in the nose gives it its aesthetic and function. Facial…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2016.

  1. CPS
    2016PMID 26616707Summary
  2. FPS
    2016PMID 26862968Summary
  3. FPS
    2016PMID 27494585Summary
  4. FPS
    2016PMID 27494586Summary
  5. FPS
    2016PMID 26862969Summary
  6. FPS
    2016PMID 28033636Summary
  7. FPS Clin
    Controversies in Revision Rhinoplasty
    Rosenberger ES, Toriumi DM
    2016PMID 27400847Summary
  8. JAMA FPS
    2016PMID 27149684Summary