rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · Adolescent and aging nose · 2016

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2016

Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and the Continuous Evolution of Preoperative and Postoperative Assessment in Rhinoplasty

Lekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd, Hellings PW.

What this paper says

A review of three-dimensional surface imaging in rhinoplasty, covering its use in showing patients the plan before surgery and in measuring shape and volume change afterwards.

Overview

The standard rhinoplasty consultation involves history, examination of both breathing and appearance, establishing what the patient wants, facial analysis from standardised photographs, and a discussion of goals and pitfalls. Two-dimensional computer morphing added to that over the previous decade. The authors review what three-dimensional surface imaging has changed, and where the field is heading.

Sections of note

  • The article is a literature review, not a study of patients.
  • Morphing of preoperative photographs is described as an evolution of the consultation that drew considerable interest in the previous decade.
  • Three-dimensional imaging is stated to have changed how surgeons manage patients before surgery and evaluate results afterwards.
  • Three stated uses: communicating with the patient before surgery, setting a surgical plan, and measuring shape and volume change resulting from the operation.
  • The review analyses current knowledge derived from the published literature.
  • Future directions in preoperative and postoperative assessment are highlighted. No patient numbers, accuracy figures or outcome data appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Simulated images shown at consultation are a communication tool, not a promise of the result.
  • Three-dimensional capture allows actual measurement of how much a nose changed, which flat photographs cannot do reliably.
  • Measuring volume change is what makes it possible to check whether grafts or fillers held their size over time.
  • A narrative review with no data cannot say how accurately these simulations predict real results.

Why this paper matters

Rhinoplasty outcome research has been limited by measuring three-dimensional changes from two-dimensional photographs. Surface imaging removes that constraint and also raises the question of what a simulation shown at consultation implies. How closely simulations match outcomes, and how that affects satisfaction, remains open.

Terms

  • Three-dimensional surface imaging: capturing the shape of the face as a measurable digital surface.
  • Morphing: digitally altering a photograph to show an intended result.
  • Standardised photography: photographs taken in fixed positions and lighting so they can be compared.
  • Facial analysis: systematic assessment of facial proportions and landmarks.
  • Preoperative assessment: evaluation before surgery, covering examination, goals and planning.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“During the preoperative assessment in rhinoplasty, the surgeon takes a thorough history, performs a complete examination by assessing functional and aesthetic aspects of the nose, obtains a clear understanding of the patient's wishes, conducts facial analysis based on standardized photography, and communicates to the…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract