Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2016
Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis
Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD.
What this paper says
Across 2,326 online patient reviews of first-time rhinoplasty, overall satisfaction was 83.6 percent, but men were satisfied far less often than women, 56.1 percent against 87.6 percent.
Overview
Rhinoplasty has a lower satisfaction rate than other cosmetic procedures. Previous attempts to understand why relied on surgeon-run surveys, expert ratings and measurements. The authors instead read every primary rhinoplasty review on RealSelf, a consumer website where patients post about cosmetic surgery, and recorded gender, whether the patient was satisfied, and the stated reason.
Sections of note
- 2,326 reviews of primary rhinoplasty, 2,032 from women and 294 from men.
- Overall satisfaction rate 83.6 percent.
- Women were satisfied significantly more often than men, 87.6 percent against 56.1 percent, p less than 0.001.
- Men's most common complaints were a remaining bump on the bridge, a tip not rotated up enough, and a nose that was too small.
- Women's most common complaints were a remaining bump on the bridge, an under-rotated tip, and a bulbous tip.
- Dissatisfied women were significantly more likely than dissatisfied men to name the specific physical or functional reason. Data were compared using chi-squared analysis.
What it means for a patient
- A residual bump on the bridge and a tip left pointing too far down were the two leading complaints in both sexes.
- Men reported dissatisfaction much more often, and were vaguer about why, which the authors flag as relevant to consultation.
- The concern that the nose was made too small appeared only among men, which bears on how much reduction is appropriate.
- Reviews are self-selected and unverified, with no confirmation of what surgery was performed, no follow-up interval and no way to check the account. This is opinion data, not clinical outcome data.
Why this paper matters
It reads what patients say when no surgeon is asking, which surgeon-run surveys cannot capture. The gap between male and female satisfaction is large enough to affect how men are counselled before surgery. Whether the difference reflects surgical results, expectations, or who chooses to post a review is unresolved.
Terms
- Primary rhinoplasty: a first operation on a nose not previously operated on.
- Dorsal hump: a bump on the bridge of the nose.
- Under-rotated tip: a nasal tip left pointing further down than intended.
- Bulbous tip: a rounded, wide nasal tip lacking definition.
- Chi-squared analysis: a statistical test comparing proportions between groups.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Compared to other cosmetic procedures, rhinoplasty has a relatively low patient satisfaction rate, due to the difficulty of the procedure, and potentially unrealistic patient expectations. Understanding the reasons behind patient dissatisfaction is key to improving outcomes. Previous authors have done…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ Perioperative Corticosteroids Reduce Short-Term Edema and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-AnalysisCoroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al.2016PMID 26773090Summary
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical PearlsPeng GL, Nassif PS2016PMID 26616712Summary
- FPS Aesthetic Rhinoplasty as a Surface-Contour Operation: From Analysis to Surgery-Personal ConceptsPietro P, Iman K, Irina V2016PMID 28033632Summary
- FPS Columellar Aesthetics in Open RhinoplastyKridel RW, Kwak ES, Watson JB2016PMID 27494576Summary
- FPS Evolution of Preoperative Rhinoplasty Consult by Computer ImagingLekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd et al.2016PMID 26862968Summary