Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2016
Harvesting Rib Cartilage in Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty
Cochran CS.
What this paper says
A review arguing that the patient's own rib cartilage is the graft of choice for major nasal reconstruction when septal cartilage is insufficient, because it is the most abundant and the most reliable for structural support.
Overview
Lasting results in both first-time and revision rhinoplasty depend on rebuilding or resupporting the bone and cartilage framework of the nose. The septum is the usual first source of graft material but is often too small or already used. The author sets out rib cartilage as the preferred alternative when substantial support is needed.
Sections of note
- The article is a review chapter on harvesting technique, not a study of patients.
- The stated basis for good long-term results is adequate support or reconstruction of the osseocartilaginous framework.
- Rib cartilage is described as the author's material of choice for major nasal reconstruction.
- It applies when there is not enough septal cartilage available.
- The rib is described as the most abundant source of cartilage for fashioning grafts.
- It is described as the most reliable option where structural support is required. No patient numbers, complication rates or follow-up data appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- If the septum has already been used or is naturally small, rib cartilage is the usual next step for a nose needing substantial rebuilding.
- Taking rib cartilage means a second surgical site on the chest, with its own scar and recovery.
- The rib supplies far more cartilage than the ear or septum, which is why it is chosen when several large grafts are needed.
- No complication rates, warping rates or outcome data are given in the abstract, so the claims of reliability are not quantified here.
Why this paper matters
Graft supply is the practical constraint that shapes what can be achieved in revision rhinoplasty, and rib is the fallback that makes large reconstructions possible. Harvest technique determines the donor site risks. Published pooled data elsewhere put warping and chest scarring as the main issues, none of which this abstract quantifies.
Terms
- Autogenous or autologous graft: tissue taken from the patient's own body.
- Costal or rib cartilage: cartilage from the chest, used as structural graft material.
- Septal cartilage: the cartilage of the partition inside the nose, the usual first-choice graft source.
- Osseocartilaginous framework: the combined bone and cartilage skeleton of the nose.
- Secondary rhinoplasty: an operation on a nose that has been operated on before.
- Structural support: graft material used to hold shape rather than only to fill.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Satisfactory and consistent long-term results in primary and secondary rhinoplasty rely on adequately resupporting or reconstructing the nasal osseocartilagenous framework. Autogenous rib cartilage has been our graft material of choice for major nasal reconstruction when sufficient septal cartilage is not available.…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
181 papers on this topic.
Rib, ear and septal grafts
242 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ Anatomical Study of the Lateral Crural Strut Graft in Rhinoplasty and Its Clinical ApplicationSilva Filho Rde O, Pochat VD2016PMID 27277274Summary
- ASJ 2016PMID 27535924
- ASJ 2016PMID 27095313Full text
- ASJ Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian PatientsKao WP, Lin YN, Lin TY et al.2016PMID 26764261Summary
- CPS 2016PMID 26616708Summary
- CPS Revision RhinoplastyLoyo M, Wang TD2016PMID 26616705Summary
- FPS Evolution of Preoperative Rhinoplasty Consult by Computer ImagingLekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd et al.2016PMID 26862968Summary
- FPS 2016PMID 28033640Summary