rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2016

ASJ Aesthetic Surgery Journal · 2016

Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian Patients

Kao WP, Lin YN, Lin TY, Huang YH, Chou CK, Takahashi H, Shieh TY, Chang KP, Lee SS, Lai CS, Lin SD, Lin TM.

What this paper says

Among 198 Asian patients who had the bridge of the nose built up with transplanted fat rather than cartilage or an implant, 125 (63.1 percent) were satisfied after one to three sessions, with no major complications.

Overview

Raising the bridge of the nose is usually done with cartilage or a synthetic implant. This study tested transplanting the patient's own fat instead, placed in very small parcels using a dedicated injection device. Patients were reviewed retrospectively with satisfaction scores and before and after photographs.

Sections of note

  • 198 patients had first-time augmentation rhinoplasty using microautologous fat transplantation. Mean age 45.5 years.
  • Fat was harvested by liposuction, then processed and refined by centrifugation before transfer.
  • Small parcels of purified fat were placed into the nasal bridge with a dedicated device.
  • Mean operating time was 25 minutes per session. Patients underwent one to three sessions, with a mean 3.4 mL of fat per session, range 2.0 to 5.5 mL.
  • Mean follow-up was 19 months, range 6 to 42 months.
  • 125 of 198 patients (63.1 percent) said they were satisfied. There were no major complications. Level of evidence 4, therapeutic.

What it means for a patient

  • Fat transfer avoids both a synthetic implant and a cartilage harvest, and the procedure took about 25 minutes.
  • Most patients needed more than one session, since transplanted fat is partly reabsorbed.
  • Satisfaction was 63.1 percent, lower than typically reported for implant or cartilage augmentation, so the trade-off is a less invasive procedure for a less certain result.
  • Retrospective, single centre, no comparison group, and the abstract does not state how much of the added height persisted at final follow-up.

Why this paper matters

Implant complications drive much of the revision burden in Asian augmentation rhinoplasty, so a method using the patient's own tissue addresses a real problem. Nearly 200 patients followed to an average of 19 months is a substantial series for a fat transfer technique. What is unanswered is how much volume survives long term and how the result compares directly with implants.

Terms

  • Augmentation rhinoplasty: nasal surgery that adds material to build up the nose.
  • Autologous fat transplantation: moving the patient's own fat from one part of the body to another.
  • Liposuction: suction removal of fat, here used to harvest the graft.
  • Centrifugation: spinning at high speed to separate and purify the fat.
  • Nasal dorsum: the bridge of the nose.
  • Likert scale: a numbered rating scale used to record satisfaction.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: Numerous techniques and materials are available for increasing the dorsal height and length of the nose. Microautologous fat transplantation (MAFT) may be an appropriate strategy for augmentation rhinoplasty.

Objectives: The authors sought to determine the long-term results of MAFT with the so-called one-third maneuver in Asian patients who underwent augmentation rhinoplasty.

Methods: A total of 198 patients who underwent primary augmentation rhinoplasty with MAFT were evaluated in a retrospective study. Fat was harvested by liposuction and was processed and refined by centrifugation. Minute parcels of purified fat were transplanted to the nasal dorsum with a MAFT-Gun. Patient satisfaction was scored with a 5-point Likert scale, and aesthetic outcomes were validated with pre- and postoperative photographs.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.5 years. The mean operating time for MAFT was 25 minutes, and patients underwent 1-3 MAFT sessions. The mean volume of fat delivered per session was 3.4 mL (range, 2.0-5.5 mL). Patients received follow-up for an average of 19 months (range, 6-42 months). Overall, 125 of 198 patients (63.1%) indicated that they were satisfied with the results of 1-3 sessions of MAFT. There were no major complications.

Conclusions: The results of this study support MAFT as an appropriate fat-transfer strategy for Asian patients undergoing primary augmentation rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Year
2016
Authors
12
Type
Journal Article
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site