Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2016
Preventing Elevated Radix Deformity in Asian Rhinoplasty with a Chimeric Dorsal-Glabellar Construct
Zelken JA, Hong JP, Broyles JM, Hsiao YC.
What this paper says
Comparing 19 patients given a combined bridge and brow-area implant with 30 given a standard implant, the combined design moved the radix forward rather than upward, with a change vector of 26.1 degrees against 63.4 degrees.
Overview
Straight I-shaped implants used for Asian augmentation rhinoplasty can push the radix upward and flatten it, producing an unnatural profile. The authors developed a construct extending onto the glabella to control where the radix ends up, and compared it against the standard implant on standardised photographs.
Sections of note
- 49 patients had rhinoplasty with I-shaped implants between 2013 and 2015. Nineteen received the chimeric dorsal-glabellar implant and 30 did not.
- Mean follow-up 10.8 months, range 2 to 36 months.
- Nasal height increase was 113 percent without the chimeric implant against 107 percent with it, and bridge length increase 118 percent against 105 percent, both p less than 0.0001.
- The nasofrontal angle increased 6 degrees in both groups with no difference between them.
- The direction of radix movement was 26.1 degrees in the chimeric group against 63.4 degrees in the traditional group, p less than 0.0001, meaning a more horizontal shift.
- The technique did not significantly blunt the radix. Final radix position was determined by implant thickness and placement. Level of evidence 4.
What it means for a patient
- A straight implant can lift the top of the nose toward the forehead, which reads as unnatural in profile.
- The modified design moved the radix forward instead of upward, changing the direction of the correction rather than its amount.
- Final radix height still depends on how thick the implant is and where it is placed, so the technique controls direction, not overall size.
- Not randomly assigned, 49 patients at one centre, mean follow-up under a year, and outcomes measured from photographs rather than reported by patients.
Why this paper matters
Asian facial aesthetic surgery is framed here as enhancing rather than altering natural features, and an over-raised radix is a recognisable sign of an implant. Distinguishing forward from upward movement gives a measurable target. Long-term implant behaviour and patient satisfaction are not reported.
Terms
- Radix: the root of the nose, the deepest point of the bridge between the eyes.
- Glabella: the smooth area of the forehead between the eyebrows.
- I-shaped implant: a straight synthetic implant used to raise the nasal bridge.
- Chimeric construct: an implant combining two components serving different regions.
- Nasofrontal angle: the angle between the forehead and the bridge of the nose.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: Asian facial aesthetic surgery should enhance, but not change, natural features. Augmentation rhinoplasty is a hallmark of Asian cosmetic surgery. In the authors' experience, I-shaped implants can elevate and efface the radix, leading to an unnatural appearance (elevated radix deformity).
Objectives: The Chimeric technique was developed to control final radix position and preserve the nasal profile. We aim to demonstrate that the Chimeric technique promotes forward projection, not elevation, of the radix.
Methods: Between 2013 and 2015, 49 patients underwent rhinoplasty with I-shaped implants. Nineteen patients had Chimeric dorsal-glabellar implants, 30 did not. Standardized photographs were obtained at every visit. Novel and established photogrammetric parameters were used to describe radix position and position change. A retrospective chart review provided additional procedural details and outcomes data.
Results: Patients were followed for 10.8 months (range, 2-36 months). Nasal height increase (113% vs 107%) and bridge length increase (118% vs 105%) were significantly greater when the Chimeric technique was not performed (P < .0001). The nasofrontal angle increased 6° in both groups; there was no difference between groups. The vector of radix position change was 26.1° in the Chimeric group and 63.4° in the traditional group (P < .0001).
Conclusions: The Chimeric technique preserves the nasal profile with a favorable (horizontal) radix transposition vector. There was not a significant difference in final radix position when Chimeric rhinoplasty was performed because that is controlled by implant thickness and position. The technique did not blunt the radix significantly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty
167 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- ASJ 2016PMID 27095313Full text
- ASJ Comments on "The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty Surgery"Robiony M, Costa F, Sembronio S2016PMID 27069244
- ASJ Microautologous Fat Transplantation for Primary Augmentation Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Monitoring of 198 Asian PatientsKao WP, Lin YN, Lin TY et al.2016PMID 26764261Summary
- ASJ Response to "Comments on 'The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty Surgery'"Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM2016PMID 27069245
- ASJ The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty SurgeryGerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM2016PMID 26545389Summary
- APS Safe Planes for Injection Rhinoplasty: A Histological Analysis of Midline Longitudinal Sections of the Asian NoseTansatit T, Moon HJ, Rungsawang C et al.2016PMID 26893278Summary
- CPS 2016PMID 26616711Summary
- CPS Rhinoplasty in Middle Eastern PatientsSajjadian A2016PMID 26616714Summary