Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · 2016
Controversies in Revision Rhinoplasty
Rosenberger ES, Toriumi DM.
What this paper says
A review of revision rhinoplasty arguing that the patient's own cartilage is the primary graft material despite its limited supply, and that synthetic implants used for augmentation may have devastating consequences.
Overview
Revision rhinoplasty involves many variables affecting the final appearance and breathing result. Cartilage forms the structural framework of the lower two thirds of the nose and is what keeps the airway open long term. The article discusses past and current approaches to correcting various nasal deformities using the grafting techniques available.
Sections of note
- The article is a review chapter, not a study of patients.
- Cartilage is described as essential for long-term support and for keeping the nasal airway open.
- Autologous cartilage grafting is named as the primary source of that material.
- Its limits are stated as the quantity available at each donor site, the quality of that cartilage, and the harm caused by harvesting it.
- Alloplastic materials, both solid and injectable, are often used for augmentation.
- The authors state these may have devastating consequences. No patient numbers, complication rates or comparative outcome data appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- Rebuilding a nose after previous surgery generally requires cartilage from the patient's own body, most often from the ribs when the septum has already been used.
- The three limits on that cartilage, how much, how good and what harvesting costs, drive most of the planning in a revision.
- The warning about synthetic implants is strongly worded and reflects infection, movement and extrusion as recognised outcomes.
- A narrative review with no reported rates cannot say how often either graft type fails.
Why this paper matters
Revision rhinoplasty exists largely to correct problems created by first operations, and implant complications are a recurring source of those problems. Framing autologous cartilage as the standard, with named constraints, is the mainstream position here. The comparative data that would settle the implant question are not available.
Terms
- Revision rhinoplasty: an operation to correct the result of previous nasal surgery.
- Autologous cartilage: cartilage taken from the patient's own body.
- Alloplastic material: a manufactured implant material rather than the patient's own tissue.
- Donor site morbidity: the harm or side effects caused at the place graft tissue is taken from.
- Patent airway: a nasal passage that stays open to airflow.
- Augmentation: building up part of the nose to increase its height or projection.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Revision rhinoplasty is a complex operation with many variables that may influence the final esthetic and functional outcome of the procedure. Cartilage forms the structural framework of the lower two-thirds of nose and is essential for long-term support and maintenance of a patent nasal airway. The use of autologous…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2016.
- CPS 2016PMID 26616707Summary
- CPS Revision RhinoplastyLoyo M, Wang TD2016PMID 26616705Summary
- FPS Evolution of Preoperative Rhinoplasty Consult by Computer ImagingLekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd et al.2016PMID 26862968Summary
- FPS Revision Rhinoplasty: What Can We Learn from Error Patterns? An Analysis of Revision SurgeryEast C, Kwame I, Hannan SA2016PMID 27494585Summary
- FPS The Tongue-in-Groove Technique in Primary and Revision RhinoplastyDatema FR, Lohuis PJ2016PMID 27494586Summary
- FPS Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and the Continuous Evolution of Preoperative and Postoperative Assessment in RhinoplastyLekakis G, Claes P, Hamilton GS 3rd et al.2016PMID 26862969Summary
- FPS Treatment Strategy for Revision Rhinoplasty in AsiansJang YJ, Kim DY2016PMID 28033636Summary
- JAMA FPS A Staging System for Revision Rhinoplasty: A ReviewRodman R, Kridel R2016PMID 27149684Summary