rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2016

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2016

Treatment Strategy for Revision Rhinoplasty in Asians

Jang YJ, Kim DY.

What this paper says

A review stating that revision rhinoplasty in Asian patients is dominated by problems with previously placed implants and by weak, small septal cartilage, making the patient's own ear or rib cartilage central to the repair.

Overview

Rhinoplasty in Asian patients more often adds height to the bridge, frequently with a silicone implant, rather than reducing a hump. The authors describe the specific failure patterns that follow and the strategy they use to correct them. It is a review of expert practice with no patient numbers or outcome rates reported.

Sections of note

  • Revision in these patients is associated with problems related to grafts or implant materials.
  • Asian septal cartilage is described as generally weak and small, making it vulnerable to injury or secondary deformity during the first operation.
  • This creates increased demand for major reconstruction of the septal cartilage framework at revision.
  • Common implant problems listed: displacement, malposition, extrusion, recurrent inflammation, and infection of alloplastic material placed on the bridge.
  • Short-nose deformity after silicone rhinoplasty is named as common and difficult to manage.
  • Other frequent reasons for revision: residual or recurrent deviation, undercorrection of a convex dorsum, and tip graft complications.
  • Conchal and costal cartilage are described as pivotal for a new dorsal implant or major septal reconstruction.
  • The abstract gives no patient counts, complication rates, or follow-up.

What it means for a patient

  • A synthetic implant on the bridge can shift, poke through the skin, or become infected years later.
  • Silicone implants can pull the nose upward and shorten it, which the authors call hard to fix.
  • Correction typically means removing the implant and rebuilding with cartilage from the patient's own ear or rib.
  • This is a review without measured outcomes, so it does not state how often each problem occurs or how often the repair succeeds.

Why this paper matters

Implant-based augmentation is widespread in Asia, and the resulting revision workload has different causes than the reduction-driven revisions in Western series. The paper does not quantify implant failure rates or compare materials.

Terms

  • Alloplastic implant: An implant made of synthetic material rather than the patient's own tissue.
  • Autologous tissue: Tissue taken from the patient's own body.
  • Conchal cartilage: Cartilage taken from the bowl of the ear.
  • Costal cartilage: Cartilage joining the ribs to the breastbone, used as a graft.
  • Extrusion: An implant working its way out through the skin or lining.
  • Short-nose deformity: A nose pulled up and shortened so the nostrils are overly visible.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Revision rhinoplasty in Asian patients is associated with problems related to the use of grafts or implant materials. Moreover, the septal cartilage of Asian individuals is generally weak and small, which makes it particularly vulnerable to injury or secondary deformity during primary surgery. Hence, there is an…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2016
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2016.

  1. ASJ
    2016PMID 27095313Full text
  2. ASJ
    2016PMID 26764261Summary
  3. ASJ
    2016PMID 26879296Summary
  4. APS
    2016PMID 26893278Summary
  5. CPS
    2016PMID 26616707Summary
  6. CPS
    Revision Rhinoplasty
    Loyo M, Wang TD
    2016PMID 26616705Summary
  7. CPS
    2016PMID 26616711Summary
  8. CPS
    2016PMID 26616714Summary