rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2017

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2017

Free Diced Cartilage: A New Application of Diced Cartilage Grafts in Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty

Kreutzer C, Hoehne J, Gubisch W, Rezaeian F, Haack S.

What this paper says

Among 446 patients, revision for bridge irregularities within 7 months occurred in 5.2 percent using free diced cartilage alone, 8.2 percent using fascia with or without diced cartilage, and 25 percent using the classic diced cartilage in fascia technique.

Overview

Irregularities of the bridge after hump reduction account for a substantial share of revision rhinoplasties. The authors developed a method of finely dicing cartilage and placing it precisely as a paste, without wrapping it in fascia. This retrospective analysis compared three ways of covering or augmenting the bridge.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective analysis of multisurgeon consecutive open approach rhinoplasties from January to December 2014 at a single center.
  • Cartilage was harvested from septum, rib, or ear and used for smoothing, augmentation, or camouflage.
  • Group I: 325 patients with free diced cartilage grafts as the only onlay.
  • Group II: 73 patients whose dorsal onlay was fascia alone or fascia combined with free diced cartilage.
  • Group III: 48 patients receiving dorsal augmentation with the classic diced cartilage in fascia technique.
  • 446 patients total across primary and secondary rhinoplasties; observation period 7 months.
  • Revision rates for dorsal irregularities: 5.2 percent, 8.2 percent, and 25 percent for groups I, II, and III.

What it means for a patient

  • Placing diced cartilage directly, without a fascia wrap, was followed by the lowest revision rate for bridge irregularity in this series.
  • The classic wrapped technique had a revision rate roughly five times higher here.
  • Limits: retrospective, not randomized, very unequal groups of 325, 73, and 48, one center, and only 7 months of observation.
  • Group assignment reflected surgeon choice, so the groups may not have had comparable noses to begin with.

Why this paper matters

Diced cartilage in fascia has been a standard for dorsal augmentation, and this reports a substantially lower revision rate for the unwrapped version. The numbers are large for a rhinoplasty series. The non-randomized design and 7-month window leave the comparison open to selection bias and to late changes.

Terms

  • Diced cartilage graft: Cartilage cut into very small pieces and placed as a mass.
  • Free diced cartilage: Diced cartilage placed directly, without a fascia wrapping.
  • Diced cartilage in fascia: Diced cartilage wrapped in a fascia sleeve before placement.
  • Fascia: A thin sheet of fibrous tissue used to wrap or camouflage grafts.
  • Onlay: A graft laid on top of a structure to add height or smooth contour.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Irregularities or deformities of the nasal dorsum after hump reduction account for a significant number of revision rhinoplasties. The authors therefore developed a technique of meticulously dicing and exactly placing free diced cartilage grafts, harvested from septum, rib, or ear cartilage. The cartilage paste is…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2017
Authors
5
Type
Case Reports, Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract