rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Nasal tip · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · 2014

JAMA FPS JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery · 2014

The tripod graft: nasal tip cartilage reconstruction during revision rhinoplasty

Pedroza F, Pedroza LF, Achiques MT, Felipe E, Becerra F.

What this paper says

In 64 patients having revision rhinoplasty, a tip rebuilding method called the tripod technique improved tip definition in 88 percent and improved breathing collapse in 98 percent.

Overview

Revision surgery often has to rebuild a nasal tip whose cartilage was removed or weakened at an earlier operation. This retrospective study from a clinic in Bogota, Colombia reviewed patients treated between 2007 and 2012 who needed the tripod technique. Tip problems were diagnosed from photographs taken before surgery and compared with photographs taken after. Both appearance and breathing were recorded.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective descriptive study; 64 of the 69 patients who received the technique were enrolled.
  • Photographs were reviewed monthly for three months, then at 6, 9 and 12 months.
  • Measures were projection, rotation, columellar and alar retraction, alar pinch, tip definition and tip asymmetry.
  • Tip definition improved in 43 of 49 patients (88 percent).
  • Projection became normal in 28 of 40 patients (70 percent) and rotation improved in 29 of 38 (76 percent).
  • Columellar retraction improved in 18 of 24 (75 percent), alar retraction or pinch in 41 of 52 (79 percent), and inspiratory collapse in 49 of 50 (98 percent), all at P less than .001.

What it means for a patient

  • A damaged tip framework can be rebuilt rather than only reshaped, and this series reports gains in both looks and airflow.
  • There was no comparison group and no randomisation, so the results cannot be measured against another technique.
  • Assessment came from photographs graded by the treating team, and follow-up ran to twelve months.

Why this paper matters

Tip reconstruction is a central problem in revision rhinoplasty, and this paper describes one structured approach with counted outcomes. It does not show how the tripod technique compares with other grafting methods, or whether the gains hold beyond one year.

Terms

  • Revision rhinoplasty: a second or later nose operation to correct a previous result.
  • Nasal tip projection: how far the tip stands out from the face.
  • Tip rotation: the upward or downward angle of the tip.
  • Columellar retraction: the strip of tissue between the nostrils sitting too high.
  • Alar pinch: a squeezed, narrowed look to the nostril rim.
  • Inspiratory collapse: the nostril sidewall caving inward when breathing in.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“IMPORTANCE Nasal tip revision remains one of the most challenging surgical procedures for facial plastic surgeons to perform. OBJECTIVE To describe preoperative and postoperative findings related to nasal tip functional and aesthetic aspects following revision rhinoplasty using the "tripod" technique. DESIGN, SETTING,…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2014
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2014.

  1. ASJ
    2014PMID 25158684Summary
  2. ASJ
    Rhinoplasty: the lateral crura-alar ring
    Daniel RK, Palhazi P, Gerbault O et al.
    2014PMID 24682443Summary
  3. ASJ
    2014PMID 24936094Summary
  4. ASJ
    2014PMID 25028737Summary
  5. ASJ
    2014PMID 24604789Summary
  6. APS
    2014PMID 24357194Summary
  7. APS
    2014PMID 24902907Summary
  8. APS
    Interdomal-columellar myolipoma: discovered at rhinoplasty
    Finocchi V, Pellini E, Longobardi G et al.
    2014PMID 24414116Summary