Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2011
Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications
Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, Adamson PA.
What this paper says
In 400 consecutive rhinoplasty consultations, first-time patients mostly wanted a smaller nose or a hump removed, while patients who had already had surgery mostly complained of a crooked nose, tip asymmetry, wide nostrils, a scooped bridge and visible columella.
Overview
What patients say at consultation shapes the operation. The authors reviewed the presenting complaints of a large consecutive series and compared those coming for a first rhinoplasty with those coming to correct an earlier one, to learn which problems most often drive revision.
Sections of note
- Retrospective review of 400 consecutive rhinoplasty patients at one practice.
- Demographics and complaints about nasal appearance and function were recorded and ranked; associations tested by logistic regression.
- Primary patients were significantly more likely to cite "too large" and "dorsal hump."
- Revision patients were far more likely to cite "crooked nose," "tip asymmetry," "wide or large nostrils," "dorsal sloop" and "columellar show."
- "Alar retraction," "pointy tip" and "nasal scarring" appeared almost only in the revision group.
- The abstract gives no percentages for individual complaints.
What it means for a patient
- The problems that bring patients back for a second operation are asymmetry, crookedness and over-resection, not size.
- A first surgery that avoids over-narrowing, over-scooping and tip cartilage weakness addresses the most common revision complaints.
- Single practice, and complaints are recorded from consultations rather than measured; no outcome data.
Why this paper matters
It maps the gap between what primary patients ask for and what goes wrong, giving newer surgeons a list of pitfalls. It does not link complaints to specific prior techniques or report how the revision patients fared after correction.
Terms
- Primary rhinoplasty: a first-time nose operation.
- Revision rhinoplasty: a repeat operation on a nose that has already had surgery.
- Dorsal hump: the bump on the bridge made of bone and cartilage.
- Dorsal scoop: a bridge that dips too low in profile after too much hump removal.
- Columellar show: too much of the strip between the nostrils visible from the side.
- Alar retraction: the nostril rim pulled upward, exposing too much nostril.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Rhinoplasty patients often present with specific concerns and are frequently exacting in their demands and expectations of the surgical experience. Objectives: The authors assess the presenting complaints expressed during the rhinoplasty consultation process and compare the presentations of primary versus revision…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Revision and secondary rhinoplasty
181 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2011.
- ASJ Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisHatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN et al.2011PMID 21813878Summary
- ASJ The role of septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: cadaveric analysis and assessment of graft selectionde Pochat VD, Alonso N, Figueredo A et al.2011PMID 22001343Summary
- APS Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty populationGode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S et al.2011PMID 21487908Summary
- FPS A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patientPalma P, Khodaei I, Tasman AJ2011PMID 21404157Summary
- FPS 2011PMID 22028013Summary
- FPS Clin Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D imagesToriumi DM, Dixon TK2011PMID 22004862Summary
- PRS Dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty: a quantitative outcome-based assessment of the component dorsal reduction techniqueMojallal A, Ouyang D, Saint-Cyr M et al.2011PMID 21701345Summary