Journal archive · Dorsum and hump · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2011
Dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty: a quantitative outcome-based assessment of the component dorsal reduction technique
Mojallal A, Ouyang D, Saint-Cyr M, Bui N, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ.
What this paper says
In 100 consecutive primary rhinoplasties measured on photographs more than a year after surgery, symmetry of the two curved lines running down the bridge rose from 68% to 94%, and harmonious lines rose from 32.5% to 97%.
Overview
The dorsal aesthetic lines are the two gentle curves from the brows to the tip that give the nose its shape from the front. Removing a hump can break them. The authors measured these lines before and after component dorsal reduction, a stepwise hump technique, using software that scales each face to its own pupil-to-pupil distance.
Sections of note
- 100 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients from one surgeon (R.J.R.), with institutional review board consent.
- All postoperative photographs taken at more than 1 year.
- Software quantified dorsal line symmetry, nose width and side-to-side variation, normalized to pupil-to-pupil distance.
- Mean dorsal line symmetry 68% before and 94% after surgery.
- Harmonious dorsal lines in 32.5% before and 97% after.
- Ability to identify the lines was similar in 74.6%, improved in 15.7% and decreased in 9.7%.
- Nasal width lines were similar in 36 patients, wider in 21 and narrower in 43.
- Level of evidence: therapeutic, IV.
What it means for a patient
- Taking a hump down in separate steps, rather than in one cut, produced smooth and symmetric bridge lines in almost every patient at one year or more.
- About 1 in 10 patients had lines that were harder to identify after surgery.
- One surgeon's results, no comparison group, and the measurements are of photographs rather than patient-reported satisfaction.
Why this paper matters
It puts numbers on an aesthetic goal that surgeons usually judge by eye and documents the component technique from the group that popularized it. Whether other surgeons achieve the same figures, and how the lines relate to patient satisfaction, remain untested.
Terms
- Dorsal aesthetic lines: the paired curved highlights from the brow to the tip seen on the front view.
- Component dorsal reduction: removing a hump in stages, cartilage and bone separately, to keep the middle vault intact.
- Middle nasal vault: the cartilage part of the bridge between the nasal bones and the tip.
- Internal nasal valve: the narrow airway between the septum and the upper lateral cartilage.
- Photogrammetric analysis: measurement taken from standardized photographs.
- Level IV evidence: a case series without a comparison group.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Preservation or reconstruction of the middle nasal vault structure and internal nasal valve after dorsal reduction is challenging. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze a series of 100 consecutive rhinoplasty cases with respect to preservation or restoration of the dorsal nasal lines following…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2011.
- ASJ Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implicationsChauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A et al.2011PMID 21908809Summary
- ASJ Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisHatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN et al.2011PMID 21813878Summary
- ASJ The role of septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: cadaveric analysis and assessment of graft selectionde Pochat VD, Alonso N, Figueredo A et al.2011PMID 22001343Summary
- APS A novel autologous scaffold for diced-cartilage grafts in dorsal augmentation rhinoplastyBullocks JM, Echo A, Guerra G et al.2011PMID 21487909Summary
- APS Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty populationGode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S et al.2011PMID 21487908Summary
- Arch FPS Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as dorsal augmentation material in rhinoplasty on Southeast Asian noses: three-year experienceYap EC, Abubakar SS, Olveda MB2011PMID 21768557Summary
- Arch FPS Osseocartilaginous rib graft rhinoplasty: a stable, predictable technique for major dorsal reconstructionChristophel JJ, Hilger PA2011PMID 21079106Summary
- Arch FPS Sonic rhinoplasty: histologic correlates and technical refinements using the ultrasonic bone aspiratorGreywoode JD, Pribitkin EA2011PMID 21931085Summary