Journal archive · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2011
Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty population
Gode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S, Apaydin F.
What this paper says
Comparing 40 Turkish rhinoplasty patients with 40 people happy with their faces, the measurements that most set patients apart were a crooked nose, an open forehead-nose angle, a sharp nose-lip angle, a weak chin and a tall midface.
Overview
Which facial measurements push people to seek rhinoplasty? The authors compared photographs of Turkish rhinoplasty patients with photographs of Turkish people who had no nasal deformity and were satisfied with their appearance, using facial analysis software to measure angles and proportions.
Sections of note
- 40 rhinoplasty patients (20 men, 20 women) and 40 controls without nasal deformity (20 men, 20 women).
- Rhinobase software used for photogrammetric analysis of facial photographs.
- Significant differences (P < 0.05) between patients and controls, and between men and women, in nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, chin projection, middle facial height and tip deviation angle.
- Patients showed a crooked nose, an obtuse nasofrontal angle, an acute nasolabial angle, chin underprojection and increased middle facial height.
- The abstract gives no mean values for the measurements.
What it means for a patient
- Features other than the nose, notably a receding chin and a long midface, were more common in people seeking rhinoplasty in this sample.
- A surgeon may look at chin and facial proportions when planning a nose operation.
- Small sample from one population; norms for other ethnic groups may differ, and the abstract lists no measurement values.
Why this paper matters
Facial norms drive rhinoplasty planning, and most published norms come from Western populations. This study adds population-specific data for Turkey and links specific measurements to the decision to seek surgery. Whether correcting these measurements improves satisfaction is not tested.
Terms
- Photogrammetry: taking measurements from standardized photographs.
- Nasofrontal angle: the angle between the forehead and the bridge at the root of the nose.
- Nasolabial angle: the angle between the columella and the upper lip, a measure of tip rotation.
- Chin projection: how far the chin stands forward in profile.
- Middle facial height: the vertical distance across the middle third of the face.
- Tip deviation angle: how far the nasal tip sits off the facial midline.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The aim of this study was to compare the facial photogrammetric analysis results of the Turkish population who are pleased with their facial appearance with the facial analysis data of patients who underwent rhinoplasty in order to find the most prominent objective facial measurements that lead patients to surgical…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty
167 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2011.
- ASJ Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implicationsChauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A et al.2011PMID 21908809Summary
- ASJ Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisHatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN et al.2011PMID 21813878Summary
- ASJ The role of septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: cadaveric analysis and assessment of graft selectionde Pochat VD, Alonso N, Figueredo A et al.2011PMID 22001343Summary
- APS Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI) for identifying patients with BDD seeking rhinoplasty: using a Persian (Farsi) versionGhadakzadeh S, Ghazipour A, Khajeddin N et al.2011PMID 21491168Summary
- APS Treatment protocol for "Mestizo nose" with open rhinoplastyde la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF2011PMID 21533985Summary
- Arch FPS Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as dorsal augmentation material in rhinoplasty on Southeast Asian noses: three-year experienceYap EC, Abubakar SS, Olveda MB2011PMID 21768557Summary
- FPS A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patientPalma P, Khodaei I, Tasman AJ2011PMID 21404157Summary
- FPS Clin Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D imagesToriumi DM, Dixon TK2011PMID 22004862Summary