rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2011

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2011

Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty population

Gode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S, Apaydin F.

What this paper says

Comparing 40 Turkish rhinoplasty patients with 40 people happy with their faces, the measurements that most set patients apart were a crooked nose, an open forehead-nose angle, a sharp nose-lip angle, a weak chin and a tall midface.

Overview

Which facial measurements push people to seek rhinoplasty? The authors compared photographs of Turkish rhinoplasty patients with photographs of Turkish people who had no nasal deformity and were satisfied with their appearance, using facial analysis software to measure angles and proportions.

Sections of note

  • 40 rhinoplasty patients (20 men, 20 women) and 40 controls without nasal deformity (20 men, 20 women).
  • Rhinobase software used for photogrammetric analysis of facial photographs.
  • Significant differences (P < 0.05) between patients and controls, and between men and women, in nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, chin projection, middle facial height and tip deviation angle.
  • Patients showed a crooked nose, an obtuse nasofrontal angle, an acute nasolabial angle, chin underprojection and increased middle facial height.
  • The abstract gives no mean values for the measurements.

What it means for a patient

  • Features other than the nose, notably a receding chin and a long midface, were more common in people seeking rhinoplasty in this sample.
  • A surgeon may look at chin and facial proportions when planning a nose operation.
  • Small sample from one population; norms for other ethnic groups may differ, and the abstract lists no measurement values.

Why this paper matters

Facial norms drive rhinoplasty planning, and most published norms come from Western populations. This study adds population-specific data for Turkey and links specific measurements to the decision to seek surgery. Whether correcting these measurements improves satisfaction is not tested.

Terms

  • Photogrammetry: taking measurements from standardized photographs.
  • Nasofrontal angle: the angle between the forehead and the bridge at the root of the nose.
  • Nasolabial angle: the angle between the columella and the upper lip, a measure of tip rotation.
  • Chin projection: how far the chin stands forward in profile.
  • Middle facial height: the vertical distance across the middle third of the face.
  • Tip deviation angle: how far the nasal tip sits off the facial midline.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The aim of this study was to compare the facial photogrammetric analysis results of the Turkish population who are pleased with their facial appearance with the facial analysis data of patients who underwent rhinoplasty in order to find the most prominent objective facial measurements that lead patients to surgical…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2011
Authors
4
Type
Comparative Study, Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2011.

  1. ASJ
    2011PMID 21908809Summary
  2. ASJ
    2011PMID 21813878Summary
  3. ASJ
    2011PMID 22001343Summary
  4. APS
    2011PMID 21491168Summary
  5. APS
    Treatment protocol for "Mestizo nose" with open rhinoplasty
    de la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF
    2011PMID 21533985Summary
  6. Arch FPS
    2011PMID 21768557Summary
  7. FPS
    2011PMID 21404157Summary
  8. FPS Clin
    2011PMID 22004862Summary