Journal archive · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2011
Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D images
Toriumi DM, Dixon TK.
What this paper says
This article describes how three-dimensional facial scans taken before and after rhinoplasty can be overlaid to measure the change produced by dorsal augmentation, tip projection, narrowing and lengthening; the abstract reports no patient counts.
Overview
Standard photographs show a nose from fixed angles and cannot measure volume. Three-dimensional imaging captures the whole surface. The authors describe the camera equipment and software used, discuss whether its measurements are valid and repeatable, and set out methods for reading the surgical change when the preoperative and postoperative scans are superimposed.
Sections of note
- Technical and descriptive article; the abstract gives no patient series or outcome figures.
- Covers the hardware and software used to create facial 3D images.
- Discusses validation and reliability of objective measurements made with the equipment.
- Preoperative and postoperative scans are overlaid to show change in three dimensions.
- Methods are given for four technique groups: dorsal augmentation, increasing tip projection, narrowing the nose and nasal lengthening.
What it means for a patient
- Some practices can scan the face in 3D and later show exactly where the nose changed and by how much.
- The same tool can be used to plan and to check whether the planned change was achieved.
- The abstract does not report how accurate the measurements are in numbers or how many patients were assessed.
Why this paper matters
Objective measurement of rhinoplasty results has lagged behind technique. This article, from a group known for structural rhinoplasty, describes a way to quantify outcomes technique by technique. Whether 3D measurements track patient satisfaction is not addressed.
Terms
- 3D imaging: capturing the surface of the face as a digital model that can be rotated and measured.
- Overlay: placing the before and after models on top of each other to see the difference.
- Dorsal augmentation: raising the height of the nasal bridge.
- Tip projection: how far the tip stands out from the face.
- Nasal lengthening: surgery to make a short nose longer, usually by extending the septum.
- Validation: testing whether a measurement method gives accurate and repeatable results.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“This article describes the equipment and software used to create facial 3D imaging and discusses the validation and reliability of the objective assessments done using this equipment. By overlaying preoperative and postoperative 3D images, it is possible to assess the surgical changes in 3D. Methods are described to…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2011.
- ASJ Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implicationsChauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A et al.2011PMID 21908809Summary
- ASJ Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysisHatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN et al.2011PMID 21813878Summary
- ASJ The role of septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: cadaveric analysis and assessment of graft selectionde Pochat VD, Alonso N, Figueredo A et al.2011PMID 22001343Summary
- APS Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty populationGode S, Tiris FS, Akyildiz S et al.2011PMID 21487908Summary
- FPS A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patientPalma P, Khodaei I, Tasman AJ2011PMID 21404157Summary
- PRS Dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty: a quantitative outcome-based assessment of the component dorsal reduction techniqueMojallal A, Ouyang D, Saint-Cyr M et al.2011PMID 21701345Summary