rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2023

ASJ Aesthetic Surgery Journal · 2023

Revision Rhinoplasty Using Glued Diced Costal Cartilage Shaped With Mold for Management of Complicated Silicone Rhinoplasty

Fung CY, Kim JH, Liao PH, Jang YJ.

What this paper says

In 28 patients whose silicone nasal implants were removed and replaced with molded glued diced rib cartilage, 91.1 percent were judged to have good or excellent results over a mean follow up of 18.3 months.

Overview

A silicone implant that has caused problems must be replaced with something, and choosing that replacement material is the hard part. The authors report their experience with a molded glued diced cartilage graft, in which rib cartilage is chopped fine, bound with glue and shaped in a mold. They retrospectively reviewed records from a tertiary center between 1 February 2018 and 28 February 2022.

Sections of note

  • Design: retrospective medical record review, 28 patients, 9 men and 19 women, single tertiary center.
  • The principal reason for revision was cosmetic dissatisfaction. Mean follow up was 18.3 months.
  • All patients had dorsal augmentation with molded glued diced cartilage. Other techniques included caudal septal extension, extended spreader grafts and tip grafts.
  • 91.1 percent were judged good or excellent on aesthetic outcome scoring.
  • Significant increases in dorsal height 2.78 percent, radix height 2.26 percent, nasal length 7.53 percent, tip projection 2.40 percent, and axis deviation reduced 1.15 degrees, all p less than 0.05.
  • Two patients had complications: one infection and one case of cosmetic dissatisfaction.

What it means for a patient

  • Replacing a problem silicone implant with your own rib cartilage, chopped and molded, gave good or excellent appearance in nine of ten patients here.
  • Using rib means a chest incision and a second surgical site, which the abstract does not discuss.
  • The measured shape gains were small in percentage terms, in the range of 2 to 8 percent.
  • Limits: 28 patients, one center, retrospective, no comparison group, follow up under two years, and aesthetic outcome scored without a named validated tool.

Why this paper matters

Silicone augmentation is common in Asian practice and its failures generate a steady stream of revision cases in which the bridge must be rebuilt from scratch. Molded diced cartilage offers a shapeable, entirely autologous option. Long term resorption and comparison with solid rib grafts remain open.

Terms

  • Diced cartilage: cartilage cut into tiny pieces so it can be molded like a paste.
  • Costal cartilage: cartilage from the ribs, harvested for use as a graft.
  • Dorsal augmentation: adding height to the bridge of the nose.
  • Radix: the root of the nose, the area between the eyes.
  • Caudal septal extension: a graft fixed to the lower septum to set tip position.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Complicated silicone nose is a common clinical problem. Selection of replacement material for revision dorsal augmentation is a challenging task. Objectives: The authors presented their experience in the use of molded glued diced cartilage graft (GDCG) for revision rhinoplasty in patients who had complicated silicone…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Year
2023
Authors
4
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2023.

  1. ASJ
    2023PMID 35786707Summary
  2. ASJ
    2023PMID 36656674Summary
  3. ASJ
    2023PMID 36793242
  4. ASJ
    2023PMID 36004498
  5. ASJ
    2023PMID 37200406Summary
  6. ASJ
    2023PMID 35748855Summary
  7. APS
    2023PMID 35606536Summary
  8. APS
    2023PMID 37640816Summary