Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2023
The Effect of Rhinoplasty Dissection Planes (Sub-SMAS, Subperichondrial, and Subperiosteal) on the Viability of Diced Cartilage Grafts in a Rabbit Model
Eravci FC, Kaplan Ö, Oltulu P, Arbağ H, Eryilmaz MA, Aricigil M, Dündar MA.
What this paper says
In rabbits, diced cartilage grafts placed in the sub-SMAS layer had 67.5 percent living cartilage cells after 90 days, compared with 35 percent in the subperichondrial layer and 20 percent in the subperiosteal layer.
Overview
Surgeons choose which tissue layer to lift when exposing the nose. Deeper planes, subperichondrial and subperiosteal, have spread with preservation rhinoplasty because they reduce swelling and speed healing. Whether those planes affect the survival of cartilage grafts placed in them was unknown. The authors placed diced cartilage in each of three planes in a rabbit model and examined the tissue microscopically after 90 days.
Sections of note
- Design: rabbit study, three planes compared, tissue examined 90 days after graft placement.
- Viability was judged by loss of cartilage cell nuclei, new cell growth at the graft edge, and loss of matrix staining.
- Median live cell percentages: 67.5 percent sub-SMAS, 35 percent subperichondrial, 20 percent subperiosteal, p equal to 0.001.
- Median peripheral cell proliferation: 80.0 percent sub-SMAS, 30 percent subperichondrial, 20 percent subperiosteal, p equal to 0.001.
- Between group testing showed the difference lay between sub-SMAS and the two deeper planes.
- Less loss of cartilage matrix was seen in the sub-SMAS group, p equal to 0.006.
What it means for a patient
- Where a graft is placed appears to matter as much as what it is made of. The more superficial plane kept far more cartilage cells alive.
- This finding runs against the trend toward deeper dissection planes when a cartilage graft is part of the plan, so the two goals may conflict.
- Limits: rabbit cartilage, blood supply and healing differ from human, and no clinical outcomes were measured. Cell survival at 90 days does not prove a graft holds volume in a human nose over years.
Why this paper matters
Diced cartilage is a mainstay for smoothing and augmenting the bridge, and resorption is its recognized failure mode. Linking graft survival to the surgical plane gives a mechanism a surgeon can act on. Whether the same relationship holds in humans, and whether it translates into visible volume loss, is untested.
Terms
- Diced cartilage: cartilage cut into tiny pieces so it can be molded like a paste.
- SMAS: the superficial musculoaponeurotic system, a fibrous layer beneath facial skin.
- Sub-SMAS plane: dissection just below that fibrous layer, above the cartilage covering.
- Subperichondrial plane: dissection beneath the membrane covering cartilage.
- Subperiosteal plane: dissection beneath the membrane covering bone.
- Chondrocyte: the cell type that maintains cartilage.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Dorsal preservation surgeries in which the subperichondral and subperiosteal planes are used to elevate the soft tissue envelope of the nose have become increasingly widespread because they can reduce postoperative edema and promote faster healing. However, the effects of surgical dissection planes on the viability of…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- ASJ A Modified Technique in Rhinoplasty: A Septal Extension Graft Complex Using Septal Cartilage, Ethmoid Bone, and Auricular CartilageWang J, Li B, Wang Q et al.2023PMID 35786707Summary
- ASJ Analysis of the Cause of Cartilage Warping in the Rhinoplasty of Costal Cartilage and Application of Embed-In Graft in Revisional SurgeryXu Y, Zhang X, You J et al.2023PMID 36656674Summary
- ASJ 2023PMID 36793242
- ASJ 2023PMID 36004498
- ASJ Revision Rhinoplasty Using Glued Diced Costal Cartilage Shaped With Mold for Management of Complicated Silicone RhinoplastyFung CY, Kim JH, Liao PH et al.2023PMID 37289986Summary
- ASJ X-shaped Tip Graft: A Versatile Solution for Warping Correction in Rib Cartilage-Based RhinoplastyWu L, You J, Wang H et al.2023PMID 35748855Summary
- APS Autologous Shuffling Lipo-Aspirated Fat Combined Mechanical Stretch in Revision Rhinoplasty for Severe Contractures in Asian PatientsAn Y, Wang G, Shang Y et al.2023PMID 35606536Summary
- APS Comparison of the Effects of Spreader Graft Versus Spreader Flap on Nasal Valve Angle in Open Approach RhinoplastyKoplay TG, Inan I, Ozer H2023PMID 37640816Summary