rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Ethnic, Asian, Middle Eastern, African and Latino rhinoplasty · 2015

JAMA FPS JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery · 2015

Revision Rhinoplasty for Short Noses in the Asian Population

Lan MY, Jang YJ.

What this paper says

Among 41 Asian patients whose noses were left too short by previous surgery, revision lengthened the nose by 12.0 percent and increased tip projection by 13.4 percent, with complications in 11 patients (27 percent).

Overview

A nose shortened and rotated upward by earlier surgery is one of the hardest problems to correct. The authors reviewed 41 such patients treated at a tertiary referral centre in South Korea between October 2006 and August 2014.

Sections of note

  • 41 patients, mean age 36.5 years, 16 men and 25 women.
  • The most common dorsal graft used in the previous operation was silicone, followed by fascia with or without cartilage.
  • Techniques used at revision included septal reconstruction, cartilage flap technique, tip surgery, lateral compartment correction and dorsal augmentation.
  • Autologous costal cartilage was the most common material for rebuilding the septum.
  • 11 patients (27 percent) had complications: infection, nostril asymmetry and pollybeak deformity.
  • Significant changes: nasal length up 12.0 percent, tip projection up 13.4 percent, nasofrontal angle down 2.39 degrees, nasolabial angle down 7.62 degrees, columella-lobular angle up 3.25 degrees. More than 90 percent (37 patients) were judged to have good or excellent aesthetic results.

What it means for a patient

  • Lengthening a nose that previous surgery made too short usually needs several techniques in the same operation, not one fix.
  • More than a quarter of patients had a complication, which is high compared with first-time rhinoplasty, and the authors state patients should be told this beforehand.
  • Rebuilding the framework generally required rib cartilage, meaning a second surgical site on the chest.
  • Retrospective, single centre, no comparison group, and outcomes were graded by clinicians rather than patients.

Why this paper matters

It documents the cost of correcting a specific failure pattern that follows implant-based Asian rhinoplasty, with measured geometry rather than description. The 27 percent complication rate is the practical number for consent discussions. What is unanswered is how the corrected length holds over years and whether patients agree with the clinician grading.

Terms

  • Short nose: a nose whose length from root to tip is reduced, often with the tip rotated upward.
  • Revision rhinoplasty: an operation to correct the result of previous nasal surgery.
  • Septal reconstruction: rebuilding the central partition of the nose to restore support.
  • Costal cartilage: cartilage from the ribs, used as structural graft material.
  • Pollybeak deformity: fullness above the tip that gives the profile a parrot-beak shape.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Short nose, especially postoperative short nose in Asian patients, remains a challenging problem for plastic surgeons. Objective: To determine the outcomes of revision rhinoplasty of postoperative short noses in Asian patients. Design, Setting, And Participants: We performed a retrospective medical record review of 41…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2015
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract