Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · 2020
Revision Rhinoplasty: Conservation versus Deconstruction
Lu GN, Papel ID.
What this paper says
A case-based review arguing that structural cartilage grafts resist the forces that deform a nose over time, but that using many of them simultaneously destroys the natural supports they replace.
Overview
Contemporary rhinoplasty relies on structural grafting to hold shape against tissue contraction, gravity and breathing pressure. The authors identify the tension this creates in revision surgery: each added graft requires taking apart more of what remains. The article presents techniques in a case format.
Sections of note
- Revision rhinoplasty is framed as requiring a careful balance between conservation and deconstruction.
- Contemporary rhinoplasty has focused on structural cartilage grafts.
- Those grafts resist static and dynamic forces from tissue contraction, gravity, and pressure gradients during breathing.
- Simultaneous use of multiple grafts leads to increased deconstruction of natural supports.
- The article discusses simple but effective revision techniques in a case-based format.
- The abstract names no specific techniques.
- No patient numbers, outcomes, complication rates, or follow-up are reported.
What it means for a patient
- Grafts hold shape over years against forces that would otherwise pull the nose out of position.
- Placing many grafts means dismantling more of the existing structure to fit them.
- The authors favor doing less where the remaining supports can be preserved.
- This is a case-based review with no measured outcomes, so it reports no success rates.
Why this paper matters
Revision rhinoplasty has trended toward extensive rebuilding, and this argues the cost of that is the natural support removed to allow it. The conservation position is a counterweight to that trend. No data is offered comparing conservative and extensive approaches.
Terms
- Structural cartilage graft: A cartilage piece placed to hold shape and resist collapse over time.
- Deconstruction: Taking apart the existing nasal framework.
- Tissue contraction: Scar tissue tightening over months and years after surgery.
- Pressure gradient: The suction generated inside the nose during breathing in.
- Revision rhinoplasty: A second operation on a nose already operated on.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Revision rhinoplasty requires the surgeon to strike a careful balance between conservation and deconstruction. Contemporary rhinoplasty has focused on structural cartilage grafts. These grafts resist static and dynamic forces produced by tissue contraction, gravity, and pressure gradients during respiration. However,…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.
Related papers
Same topic, 2020.
- APS A Special Instrument for Harvesting the Split Rib Graft for Revision Rhinoplasty: Ors RetractorOrs S2020PMID 32936331
- FPSAM Preoperative Computer Simulation in Rhinoplasty Using Previous Postoperative ImagesBashiri-Bawil M, Rahavi-Ezabadi S, Sadeghi M et al.2020PMID 32380871Summary
- PRS Rhinoplasty Refinements: Revision Rhinoplasty Using Fresh Frozen Costal Cartilage AllograftRohrich RJ, Shanmugakrishnan RR, Mohan R2020PMID 32459773Summary
- PRS Secondary Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty Using Natural Curvature of Rib Cartilage as Alar Rim Graft: A Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Long-Term ResultsLiu CS, Hsiao YC, Huang JJ et al.2020PMID 32097325Summary
- PRS The SPF-SPLF Graft: Building the Ideal Dorsum in Revision RhinoplastyRobotti E, Leone F2020PMID 32459772Summary
- PRS-GO Treating Symptomatic Midvault Soft Tissue Collapse in Revision Rhinoplasty with a Nasal Wall ImplantSeyidova N, Chen AD, Kazei D et al.2020PMID 32766052Summary