rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Revision and secondary rhinoplasty · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2022

PRS Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2022

Fresh Frozen Rib Cartilage Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty: A 9-Year Experience

Rohrich RJ, Abraham J, Alleyne B, Bellamy J, Mohan R.

What this paper says

Across 226 revision rhinoplasties using fresh frozen donor rib cartilage, the infection rate was 2.7 percent and most infections were controlled with antibiotics alone.

Overview

Revision rhinoplasty is difficult, and the difficulty increases when little septal cartilage remains for rebuilding the framework. Taking the patient's own rib lengthens the operation and can cause chest problems including contour irregularity, poor scarring and a collapsed lung. This retrospective review covered the senior author's patients from 2011 to 2020, including only revision cases using off the shelf fresh frozen donor cartilage with at least six months of follow up.

Sections of note

  • Retrospective review; 226 patients met inclusion criteria; therapeutic level of evidence IV.
  • All had open rhinoplasty with fresh frozen rib cartilage grafts.
  • Mean follow up was 12.18 months, range 6 months to 8 years.
  • Outcomes assessed were warping, resorption, displacement and infection.
  • Fifty four percent of patients had undergone one previous rhinoplasty.
  • Four percent had undergone four or more previous nasal procedures.
  • The overall infection rate was 2.7 percent, six patients.
  • Most infections, 2.3 percent, were successfully managed with antibiotics alone.

What it means for a patient

  • Fresh frozen donor cartilage is available off the shelf, so no chest incision is required and no lung risk is taken.
  • Infection occurred in about one patient in 37, and only one required more than antibiotics.
  • The abstract reports rates only for infection; warping, resorption and displacement were assessed but their rates are not given.
  • This is one surgeon's series with no comparison group receiving the patient's own or irradiated rib.

Why this paper matters

Cartilage supply is the limiting factor in revision rhinoplasty, and the choice is between a chest harvest and donor material. This nine year series reports on the fresh frozen option specifically. Its claimed advantage over the patient's own or irradiated rib is asserted rather than compared.

Terms

  • Fresh frozen cadaveric rib: donor rib cartilage preserved by freezing rather than irradiation.
  • Autologous costal cartilage: rib cartilage taken from the patient's own body.
  • Warping: gradual bending of a cartilage graft after placement.
  • Resorption: gradual absorption and loss of graft material by the body.
  • Pneumothorax: air leaking into the chest cavity, which can collapse a lung.
  • Revision rhinoplasty: surgery on a nose that has already been operated on.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Revision rhinoplasty is undoubtedly one of the most challenging procedures in facial plastic surgery. The complexity is compounded when there is a paucity of native septal cartilage to perform the required framework reconstruction. Harvest of autologous costal cartilage can result in increased operative times and…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
5
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  2. APS
    2022PMID 35577970Summary
  3. APS
    2022PMID 34595596Summary
  4. APS
    2022PMID 34731262Summary
  5. APS
    2022PMID 35817877Full text
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35412066
  7. APS
    2022PMID 34981155
  8. APS
    2022PMID 34231023