rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Rib, ear and septal grafts · 2022

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2022

Diced Cartilage Techniques in Rhinoplasty

Dong W, Han R, Fan F.

What this paper says

A systematic review of how diced cartilage is prepared and wrapped for nasal bridge augmentation, concluding that no optimal wrapping material has been established.

Overview

Diced cartilage is widely used in rhinoplasty, particularly for building up sections of the bridge, with favourable results over time. Various techniques have been developed to increase its stability and cell survival, including wrapping it in blood or non blood materials and changing the shape of the pieces. The review surveys those strategies with emphasis on the wrapping materials.

Sections of note

  • Systematic review of published strategies; the journal assigns level of evidence IV.
  • Free diced cartilage carries a risk of the pieces gathering in one area and causing irregularities.
  • Among non blood wrappings, Surgicel is now rarely used because of severe foreign body reactions.
  • Fascia has the drawbacks of a second surgical site, insufficient quantity and being time consuming.
  • Diced cartilage wrapped in processed fascia lata, AlloDerm or esterified hyaluronic acid gave encouraging early results but raised controversy over increased inflammation.
  • Wrapping in blood products such as platelet rich fibrin or concentrated growth factor achieved long term reliable aesthetic results.
  • Shaved cartilage and ultra diced cartilage have recently shown satisfactory outcomes, with further study still needed.
  • The authors state the optimal technique remains inconclusive.

What it means for a patient

  • The cartilage itself is standard; the debate is over what holds it together and where that material comes from.
  • Wrapping in a patient's own blood products avoids a second incision and, per this review, gave the most durable results.
  • Several manufactured wrapping materials produced inflammation, which is why their use is contested.
  • The review reports no pooled complication rates or comparative statistics in the abstract.

Why this paper matters

Diced cartilage is the default material for bridge augmentation and every surgeon must choose how to contain it. This review maps each option to its known drawback. Without a head to head comparison it cannot say which is best.

Terms

  • Diced cartilage: cartilage cut into small pieces so it can be shaped like a paste.
  • Fascia: a tough sheet of connective tissue used as a wrapping.
  • Surgicel: a manufactured absorbable haemostatic material.
  • AlloDerm: processed donor skin with the cells removed.
  • Platelet rich fibrin: a concentrate spun from the patient's own blood.
  • Foreign body reaction: inflammation caused by the body responding to an implanted material.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Diced cartilage has been widely applied in rhinoplasty, especially for segmental dorsal augmentation, with favorable outcomes over time. Various techniques were developed to increase both stability and viability of diced cartilage, including wrappings with non-blood material/blood products and changing the shapes of the diced cartilage, while the optimal technique is inconclusive. This article systematically reviews the current strategies of diced cartilage technique for rhinoplasty in the databases and emphasizes different wrapping materials. Free diced cartilage has a potential risk of gathering in certain regions and causing postoperative irregularities. Among non-blood wrapping materials, Surgicel is now rarely used due to severe foreign body reactions. The obvious drawbacks of fascia are donor site morbidity, inadequate quantity, and time-consuming. Although diced cartilage wrapped in tutoplast-processed fascia lata, AlloDerm, or esterified hyaluronic acid has achieved primary encouraging results, the increased inflammation raised controversies regarding their clinical use. Diced cartilage wrapped with blood products, such as platelet-rich fibrin or concentrated growth factor, achieved long-term reliable aesthetic results, and shaved cartilage and ultra-diced cartilage have recently shown satisfactory clinical outcomes, while further study is still needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2022
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article, Systematic Review
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2022.

  1. ASJ
    2022PMID 34864854Summary
  2. APS
    2022PMID 34595596Summary
  3. APS
    2022PMID 35412066
  4. APS
    2022PMID 34231023
  5. APS
    2022PMID 34254162
  6. APS
    2022PMID 35059814Summary
  7. APS
    2022PMID 35031825Summary
  8. APS
    The Use of Autologous and Cadaveric Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Survey Study
    Starr NC, Zachary Porterfield J, Harryman C et al.
    2022PMID 35043249Summary