Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2024
Functional, Cosmetic, and Psychological Outcomes after Rhinoplasty
Omer G, Girolamo S, Hamatofiq B, Tofiq S, Mohammed MA, Abdulkarim D, Mohammed S, Gubari M, Habibullah I, Mustafa A, Fatah M, Ahmed S, Kakamad F.
What this paper says
Surveying 234 rhinoplasty patients, satisfaction was 59 percent for breathing, 63.2 percent for appearance and 70.9 percent for psychological outcome.
Overview
Rhinoplasty is performed for both appearance and breathing, and the authors set out to measure satisfaction across all three domains they considered relevant: functional, cosmetic and psychological. This was a descriptive cross sectional study collecting data through interviews and an online form, analyzed with chi-square tests and descriptive statistics.
Sections of note
- Design: descriptive cross sectional study using interviews and an online questionnaire.
- 234 patients enrolled: 69.2 percent women and 30.8 percent men.
- Mean age 22.86 years, standard deviation 4.546.
- Functional satisfaction: about 59 percent.
- Cosmetic satisfaction: 63.2 percent.
- Psychological satisfaction: 70.9 percent.
- The primary reason for surgery was cosmetic in 45 percent of patients.
- The authors describe functional satisfaction as the domain most patients were satisfied with, though it is the lowest of the three reported figures.
What it means for a patient
- Satisfaction was moderate across all three domains, with roughly a third to two fifths of patients not satisfied in each.
- Psychological satisfaction was the highest, which suggests patients valued how they felt more than the physical result they could measure.
- Note that the conclusion states functional satisfaction was highest while the results report it as the lowest of the three, an internal inconsistency in the paper as printed.
- Limits: cross sectional survey, no validated instrument named, no stated follow up interval since surgery, and no comparison group.
Why this paper matters
Most rhinoplasty outcome reporting comes from surgeon led series in specialist centres, and satisfaction figures are usually higher than these. Survey based data from a general patient population gives a different picture. Without a validated questionnaire or defined follow up interval, the figures are hard to compare against published series.
Terms
- Functional outcome: the result measured by how well the nose breathes.
- Cosmetic outcome: the result measured by appearance.
- Cross-sectional study: a study measuring a group at one point in time.
- Chi-square test: a statistical test comparing categories between groups.
- Descriptive study: research that reports what was observed without testing an intervention.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty is conducted to address both cosmetic and functional objectives. It is not merely a cosmetic procedure, as it frequently aims to improve function by enhancing nasal breathing and removing congenital or acquired obstructions. The current study aims to determine the functional, cosmetic, and psychological outcomes of rhinoplasties.
Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The data were collected using an interview and an online Google form. A chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between qualitative variables and quantitative variables using frequency, percentage, and mean for quantitative variables. Each variable's P value is used to detect statistical significance. The significance level was set at a P value of less than 0.05.
Results: Of the 234 patients enrolled in this study, 69.2% were women, whereas 30.8% were men, with a mean age of 22.86 ± 4.546 years. In terms of satisfaction, functional satisfaction accounted for about 59% of all satisfaction, cosmetic satisfaction was 63.2%, and psychological satisfaction was 70.9%. The primary reason for surgery was cosmetic (45%).
Conclusion: The majority of enrolled participants were satisfied with their functional outcomes, whereas their satisfaction with psychological and cosmetic outcomes was moderate.
Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Septum, valve and airway
195 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2024.
- ASJ 2024PMID 38682262Full text
- ASJ Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized TrialZarei R, Most SP, Amali A et al.2024PMID 38366551Summary
- ASJ Rhinoplasty Outcomes in Patients With Symptoms of Body DysmorphiaLosorelli S, Kimura KS, Wei EX et al.2024PMID 38452148Summary
- ASJ Simultaneous Rhinoplasty and Septal Perforation Repair Using the Bone-Cartilaginous UnitSazgar AA, Sazgar MA, Zarringhalam MA et al.2024PMID 38648541Summary
- APS A Retrospective Study on the Reconstruction of Nasal Septal Mucosal Defects after Asian RhinoplastyDeng Y, Wang X, Qiao Z et al.2024PMID 37749417Summary
- APS Chin Dysmorphology in the Primary Rhinoplasty Population: Prevalence, Objective Analysis, and ImplicationsCoombs DM, Hua V, Patel V et al.2024PMID 37430011Summary
- APS Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal IndividualsMoosaie F, Javankiani S, Mansournia MA et al.2024PMID 38575764Summary
- APS Efficacy and Safety of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections Following Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Recommended Doses, Complications, and OutcomesKhan M, AlRajhi B, Turkistani L et al.2024PMID 38519572Summary