rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2024

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2024

Way Forward in Improving Rhinoplasty Outcomes

Xavier R.

What this paper says

A commentary arguing that better rhinoplasty results come from understanding what the patient wants, careful evaluation and patient selection, individualized planning, and reshaping rather than removing tissue.

Overview

Rhinoplasty is elective surgery aimed at both appearance and breathing, and expectations on both sides are usually high, so anything short of perfect can be read as failure. The author sets out what he considers the requirements for consistently good results, covering the consultation, the evaluation, the planning and the execution.

Sections of note

  • Article type: commentary. No patient data, rates or outcome measures are reported.
  • Stated premise: patient and surgeon expectations are usually high, and a less than perfect result can be seen as a failure.
  • Named prerequisites: fully understanding the patient's desires, careful preoperative evaluation of the face, and proper patient selection.
  • Named surgical principles: individually tailored planning, preferring remodeling over resection, and reinforcing the support of the nasal framework.
  • Stated requirement: careful surgical execution, described as likely to ensure a satisfactory and long lasting outcome.
  • The author calls for lifelong dedication and describes the rhinoplasty surgeon as an eternal student.

What it means for a patient

  • Patient selection is named as a factor in results, meaning some people are advised against surgery rather than operated on.
  • Remodeling over resection means reshaping existing structures rather than cutting them away, which is the direction the field has moved.
  • Reinforcing the framework refers to grafts and sutures that keep the nose from collapsing or drooping over time.
  • The abstract carries no findings. It states principles and reports no data about any technique or outcome.

Why this paper matters

Rhinoplasty has among the highest revision rates in elective surgery, and the causes are split between technique, healing and expectation. Commentaries that place weight on selection and expectation rather than only technique reflect that split. They do not supply evidence about which specific practices reduce revision.

Terms

  • Elective surgery: an operation chosen rather than required urgently.
  • Patient selection: deciding which patients are suitable candidates for an operation.
  • Resection: cutting away and removing tissue.
  • Remodeling: reshaping existing tissue rather than removing it.
  • Nasal framework support: the cartilage and bone structure that holds the nose in shape.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“Rhinoplasty is an elective surgical procedure to attain an aesthetic and functional improvement of the nose. The level of expectation of the patient-and the surgeon-regarding the outcome of a rhinoplasty is usually high, and any result that is less than perfect can be seen as a failure. To achieve consistently good…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
1
Type
Journal Article, Retracted Publication
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38682262Full text
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 38452148Summary
  4. APS
    2024PMID 37430011Summary
  5. APS
    2024PMID 38575764Summary
  6. APS
    2024PMID 38519572Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 38528125Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 38862661Summary