Journal archive · Nasal tip · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2023
Current Surgical Outcomes of Nasal Tip Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review
Skochdopole AJ, Bay CC, Grome L, Vorstenbosch J, Yu J, Winocour SJ, Reece EM.
What this paper says
A systematic review of 44 studies on nasal tip grafts found the published evidence is of moderate quality and suggests more than one type of graft can give satisfactory results.
Overview
Shaping the tip is often called the hardest part of rhinoplasty, and many graft techniques exist for it. The authors searched PubMed for articles on nasal tip grafts published in the previous decade, selected those meeting their criteria, and scored the quality of each. The aim was to describe what the literature actually supports rather than to test one technique.
Sections of note
- Design: systematic review of the past decade of literature, PubMed search.
- 44 studies met inclusion criteria: 38 observational studies and 6 randomized trials.
- Observational studies were scored with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, average 6.5 out of 9.
- Randomized trials were scored with the Jadad scale, average 2.5 out of 5.
- Included studies covered autologous, homologous and alloplastic grafts, meaning the patient's own tissue, donor tissue and synthetic material.
- 86.4 percent of studies reported objective outcomes using anthropometric measurements; 27.3 percent also reported patient reported outcomes.
- Stated conclusion: more than one type of tip graft may produce satisfactory outcomes.
What it means for a patient
- There is no single graft the evidence identifies as best for the nasal tip.
- Most published studies measure the result by physical measurements of the nose rather than by asking the patient, and only about a quarter did both.
- The quality scores are middling, so results across studies should be read as suggestive rather than settled.
- The review reports no pooled complication rates, revision rates or long term follow up figures in the abstract.
Why this paper matters
Tip grafting is the step where techniques proliferate fastest and where surgeon preference dominates. This review maps that literature and shows its weak point: few randomized trials and inconsistent use of patient reported outcomes. Head to head trials comparing named graft types remain the missing piece.
Terms
- Nasal tip graft: a piece of cartilage or other material placed to shape or support the tip.
- Systematic review: a structured search and appraisal of all studies meeting set criteria.
- Autologous: taken from the patient's own body.
- Alloplastic: made from synthetic material rather than tissue.
- Anthropometric measurement: measurement of physical dimensions and angles of the body.
- Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales: scoring tools that rate the methodological quality of studies.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Refinement of the nasal tip plays an important role in rhinoplasty surgery outcomes and may be considered the most technically challenging aspect of the procedure. Numerous techniques have been described for nasal tip augmentation utilizing grafts. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Nasal tip
200 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- ASJ 2023PMID 36004498
- ASJ Transection of Pitanguy's Midline Ligament to Avoid Supratip Depression in Closed-Approach, Low-Septal-Resection Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyErdal AI, Genç İG2023PMID 35908175Summary
- ASJ X-shaped Tip Graft: A Versatile Solution for Warping Correction in Rib Cartilage-Based RhinoplastyWu L, You J, Wang H et al.2023PMID 35748855Summary
- APS Comparison in Patient Satisfaction Between Structural Component and Hybrid T-bar Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort StudyVerkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G et al.2023PMID 37069352Summary
- APS Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS ScalesAlan MA, Kahraman ME, Yüksel F et al.2023PMID 36302983Summary
- APS 2023PMID 36651982Full text
- APS Permissive Hypotension in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review of Therapeutics and Associated OutcomesRobotti E, Barzoi G2023PMID 37474822Full text
- FPS Clinical Benefits of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Aesthetic Outcome Assessment in Rhinoplasty: An UpdateMaldonado-Chapa F, Datema FR, van Zijl FVWJ et al.2023PMID 36283415Summary