rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Septum, valve and airway · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2024

APS Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2024

The Effect of Functional Rhinoplasty on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chen K, Zhou L.

What this paper says

Pooling 16 studies covering 971 patients, functional rhinoplasty significantly improved every quality of life measure examined, including blockage, sinus symptoms and satisfaction.

Overview

Functional rhinoplasty is nose surgery performed mainly to improve breathing. The authors set out to review its effect on quality of life comprehensively. They searched PubMed, Ovid and Embase for eligible studies published before December 2022 and pooled the results with Stata, using four outcome instruments.

Sections of note

  • Design: systematic review with meta-analysis. Level of evidence III.
  • 16 studies including a total of 971 patients were pooled.
  • Outcomes examined: NOSE score, SNOT-22 score, a visual analog scale for obstruction, and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.
  • Functional rhinoplasty statistically reduced NOSE scores, SNOT-22 scores and the obstruction visual analog scale, where lower means better.
  • It statistically increased Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores, where higher means better.
  • The authors note the number and quality of included studies as a limitation and call for larger, higher quality studies.
  • No pooled effect sizes, confidence intervals or heterogeneity figures appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • Across the published evidence, patients report better breathing and better quality of life after surgery done for breathing reasons.
  • Four different questionnaires all moved in the same direction, which is a consistent signal.
  • The abstract gives no numbers for how large the improvement was, so the practical size of the benefit cannot be judged from it.
  • Limits: the studies pooled were mostly single group before and after designs, with no control group, so natural change and placebo effects are not separated out.

Why this paper matters

Functional rhinoplasty is often the part of nose surgery that insurers scrutinize, and evidence that it improves daily life bears directly on that. Pooling 971 patients gives more weight than any single series. The absence of controlled trials means the size of the true effect remains uncertain.

Terms

  • Functional rhinoplasty: nose surgery performed mainly to improve breathing.
  • Meta-analysis: statistical pooling of results from multiple studies.
  • NOSE score: a questionnaire measuring nasal blockage, where higher means worse.
  • SNOT-22: a 22 item questionnaire measuring sinus and nasal symptoms and their impact.
  • Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation: a patient questionnaire scoring satisfaction with the nose.
  • Quality of life: how much a condition affects daily functioning and wellbeing.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to comprehensively review the effect of functional rhinoplasty on quality of life.

Methods: Eligible studies before December 2022 were identified by searching PubMed, Ovid, and Embase databases. The meta-analysis was performed with Stata. Outcomes included NOSE, SNOT-22 scores, VAS of obstruction, and ROE.

Results: Sixteen studies, involving a total of 971 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed that functional rhinoplasty statistically reduced the NOSE, SNOT-22 scores, and VAS of obstruction and statistically increased the ROE score of patients.

Conclusion: Functional rhinoplasty could statistically significantly improve quality of life of patients. However, given the number and quality of included research, further thorough studies with a larger sample size of high-quality studies need to be conducted.

Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract as indexed by PubMed; the article is open access (PubMed Central).

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Year
2024
Authors
2
Type
Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
Access
Open access
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2024.

  1. ASJ
    2024PMID 38682262Full text
  2. ASJ
    2024PMID 38366551Summary
  3. ASJ
    2024PMID 37738132Summary
  4. ASJ
    2024PMID 38452148Summary
  5. ASJ
    2024PMID 38314894Summary
  6. ASJ
    2024PMID 38648541Summary
  7. APS
    2024PMID 37749417Summary
  8. APS
    2024PMID 37430011Summary