Journal archive · Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Complications and management · 2025
Invited Response on: The Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Mortada H.
What this paper says
An invited author response to commentary on a systematic review of hyaluronic acid filler rhinoplasty; the PubMed record carries no abstract text beyond the journal's level-of-evidence boilerplate.
Overview
This is a reply letter by Mortada, one of the authors of a systematic review on hyaluronic acid in non-surgical rhinoplasty, responding to an invited discussion of that review. The PubMed abstract field contains only the journal's standard evidence-rating notice, so the content of the reply cannot be summarised from the available source. No patients or data are involved.
Sections of note
- Publication type: invited response (letter).
- Subject: the authors' systematic review of complications, clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of hyaluronic acid filler rhinoplasty.
- No abstract content is available in the PubMed record.
What it means for a patient
- This entry is part of a published exchange between authors and commentators; it contains no findings of its own.
- Readers interested in the topic should consult the original systematic review and the invited discussion it responds to.
Why this paper matters
It completes the record of an editorial exchange on filler rhinoplasty evidence. Limits: letter, no data, no abstract available.
Terms
- Invited response: a published reply by authors to a commentary on their paper.
- Systematic review: a structured search and appraisal of all studies on a question.
- Hyaluronic acid: the most widely used filler material.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Non-surgical and filler rhinoplasty
88 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Complications and management
129 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Strategic Use of the V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised NosesSazgar AA, Sazgar MA, Zarei R et al.2025PMID 40408098Summary
- ASJ Topical Tranexamic Acid and Systemic Dexamethasone for Post-rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis: First Direct ComparisonVural O, Koycu A2025PMID 40343983Summary
- APS Assessing the Long-Term Impact of Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study Using FACE-QLombardo GAG, Melita D, Stivala A et al.2025PMID 39747421Summary
- APS Autologous Fat Injection for Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of Satisfaction, Reinjection and Fat RetentionZeng H, Tang S2025PMID 39751904Summary
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Commentary on: Advancing the Era of Liquid Rhinoplasty: A Methodological Approach to Injection ProtocolsMafra NVSC, Selvaggi G2025PMID 39690201
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary