Journal archive · Cleft, trauma and reconstruction · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2023
Long-Term Outcome of Primary Rhinoplasty with Overcorrection in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip: Avoiding Intermediate Rhinoplasty
Murali SP, Denadai R, Sato N, Lin HH, Hsiao J, Pai BCJ, Chou PY, Lo LJ.
What this paper says
Among 103 patients with a one sided cleft lip whose noses were deliberately overcorrected at the first operation, nostril and nose measurements at skeletal maturity came closer to those of people without clefts, and no intermediate surgery was needed.
Overview
There is no agreement on when or how to correct the nasal deformity that comes with a one sided cleft lip. The authors followed patients who had primary rhinoplasty with overcorrection using the Tajima technique, done by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2005, and assessed them once facial growth was complete. Results were compared with cleft patients who had primary rhinoplasty without overcorrection and with people born without clefts.
Sections of note
- Design: retrospective comparative study of consecutive nonsyndromic patients, single surgeon. Level of evidence therapeutic III.
- Groups: 103 patients treated with Tajima overcorrection, 30 cleft patients treated without it, 27 noncleft individuals.
- Outcomes: two FACE-Q satisfaction scales plus photogrammetric measurement of nostril height, nostril width, nostril area, alar height and alar width.
- The Tajima group differed significantly from the non-Tajima group on every parameter except nostril area, all p less than 0.001, with values closer to the noncleft group.
- FACE-Q nose and nostril satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between the Tajima group and the noncleft group, all p greater than 0.05.
- Stated conclusion: overcorrection at the primary operation removed the need for an intermediate rhinoplasty.
What it means for a patient
- Deliberately overcorrecting the cleft nose at the first operation is reported to leave a more symmetric nose once growth is finished.
- Satisfaction scores in the overcorrected group matched those of people born without a cleft, a demanding comparison to meet.
- Avoiding an intermediate operation means one fewer surgery in the treatment sequence.
- Limits: retrospective, one surgeon, unequal group sizes, no randomization, and measurement from photographs rather than three dimensional imaging.
Why this paper matters
Cleft nasal deformity has traditionally been treated in stages as the face grows, each stage carrying scarring and anesthesia. Long term data extending to skeletal maturity is rare here. Whether these results transfer to other surgeons and cleft severities is unanswered.
Terms
- Unilateral cleft lip: a birth difference where the lip did not join on one side.
- Overcorrection: deliberately correcting past the target, anticipating later relapse.
- Tajima technique: a named method of cleft nasal repair using a reverse U incision.
- Intermediate rhinoplasty: a corrective nose operation done during childhood.
- Photogrammetric analysis: measurement taken from standardized photographs.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“No consensus exists regarding the timing or technique of rhinoplasty for correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose deformity, with few studies examining the long-term effects of a single technique. This study appraised the long-term outcomes of primary rhinoplasty using the Tajima technique for overcorrection in a…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Cleft, trauma and reconstruction
171 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2023.
- APS Balancing the Anteroposterior Diameters of the Nostril Lengths in Cleft RhinoplastyÇerçi Özkan A, Bilgili AM, Kozanoğlu E2023PMID 36323963Summary
- APS Balancing the Anteroposterior Diameters of the Nostril Lengths in Cleft Rhinoplasty (Discussion)Termanini KM, Gosain AK2023PMID 37097454
- APS Comparison in Patient Satisfaction Between Structural Component and Hybrid T-bar Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort StudyVerkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G et al.2023PMID 37069352Summary
- APS Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS ScalesAlan MA, Kahraman ME, Yüksel F et al.2023PMID 36302983Summary
- APS Comparison of the Effects of Spreader Graft Versus Spreader Flap on Nasal Valve Angle in Open Approach RhinoplastyKoplay TG, Inan I, Ozer H2023PMID 37640816Summary
- APS 2023PMID 36651982Full text
- APS Permissive Hypotension in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review of Therapeutics and Associated OutcomesRobotti E, Barzoi G2023PMID 37474822Full text
- FPS Clinical Benefits of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Aesthetic Outcome Assessment in Rhinoplasty: An UpdateMaldonado-Chapa F, Datema FR, van Zijl FVWJ et al.2023PMID 36283415Summary