rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2021

FPS Facial Plastic Surgery · 2021

Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study

Papadopulos NA, Liebmann J, Kloeppel M, Henrich G, Machens HG, Staudenmaier R, Niehaus R.

What this paper says

In 34 patients followed for six months after septorhinoplasty by one surgeon, quality of life scores improved significantly on general wellbeing, health, nose appearance, nasal function and confidence.

Overview

The authors state their previous work found cosmetic surgery correlates positively with wellbeing afterward. This study prospectively examined quality of life changes after rhinoplasty. Thirty four patients operated on by a single surgeon between July 2015 and October 2018 completed a set of questionnaires before surgery and at six months.

Sections of note

  • Prospective cohort study, level II; 34 patients, single surgeon.
  • Instruments used were an indication specific self developed questionnaire plus the FLZM life satisfaction module, the Freiburg Personality Inventory, the Rosenberg self esteem scale, the FROI-17 and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.
  • Assessments were before surgery and at 6 months.
  • The general part of the FLZM showed increased sum scores at follow up, P equals 0.005.
  • For the health item, follow up scores were better than reference norm data, P equals 0.003.
  • Nose appearance improved significantly, P less than 0.0001, and exceeded reference data, P less than 0.010.
  • All FROI-17 items improved: overall nose P less than 0.0001, nasal function P equals 0.001, general and further symptoms P equals 0.006, and confidence from aesthetic change P less than 0.0001.
  • The Glasgow Benefit Inventory score also showed improved quality of life, P less than 0.0001.

What it means for a patient

  • Patients reported gains in both appearance and breathing, and in general life satisfaction.
  • The largest improvements were in nose appearance and in confidence connected to it.
  • Thirty four patients treated by one surgeon, with no control group, is a small study.
  • Follow up was six months, which does not capture longer term change or later dissatisfaction.

Why this paper matters

Rhinoplasty is often justified by psychological benefit, and this study measures that across several validated instruments rather than a single satisfaction score. It supports a short term gain in general wellbeing. Whether the effect persists past six months is not addressed.

Terms

  • Quality of life: a measure of general wellbeing and daily functioning.
  • FLZM: a German questionnaire measuring satisfaction across life domains.
  • FROI-17: the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory, a 17 item nose specific questionnaire.
  • Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a questionnaire measuring change in wellbeing after an intervention.
  • Prospective cohort: a study following a group forward in time from enrollment.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“As our previous studies have shown, cosmetic surgery has a positive correlation with postoperative well-being. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the postoperative changes in quality of life (QoL) after a rhinoplasty. Thirty-four patients who underwent septorhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Year
2021
Authors
7
Type
Journal Article
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topic, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2021.

  1. ASJ
    2021PMID 33945612Summary
  2. APS
    2021PMID 32974739Summary
  3. APS
    2021PMID 32875438Summary
  4. APS
    2021PMID 32747985Summary
  5. APS
    2021PMID 33811290Summary
  6. APS
    2021PMID 33063160Summary
  7. APS
    2021PMID 32974740
  8. APS
    2021PMID 34075457Full text