Journal archive · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · Anatomy and nasal analysis · 2020
The Role of Skin Thickness in the Choice of a Rhinoplasty Technique for Thin-Skinned Patients: Analysis of Long-Term Results and Patient Satisfaction
Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Ciarrocchi S, Panasiti V, Coppola R, Russo V, Tenna S, Persichetti P.
What this paper says
In 101 thin-skinned patients randomized to four bridge camouflage options, only the diced cartilage group showed significant improvement in FACE-Q satisfaction, and those results held over a mean 2.5 years.
Overview
Thin nasal skin lets every edge of the underlying framework show, so surgeons place a camouflage layer over the bridge. This randomized study compared three camouflage materials against no camouflage, following patients for at least two years.
Sections of note
- Inclusion required primary rhinoplasty, thin skin, at least 2 years of follow-up, standard before and after photography, understanding of Italian, and a signed consent form.
- Four randomized groups: diced cartilage, lipofilling, temporal fascia graft, and a control group with no camouflage.
- Patients answered the Italian FACE-Q rhinoplasty module; nasal skin thickness was measured with the Obagi skin pinch test.
- Two plastic surgeons rated all postoperative photographs on a 1 to 5 scale.
- 101 patients operated between January 2016 and March 2018 were enrolled; mean age 38.5 years; mean follow-up 2.5 years.
- Only group 1, diced cartilage, showed significant preoperative to postoperative FACE-Q improvement, P below 0.01, and its results remained stable over long-term follow-up, P below 0.01.
- Groups 2 and 4, lipofilling and control, underwent more secondary procedures than groups 1 and 3, P below 0.01. Level of evidence I.
What it means for a patient
- Thin skin needs something between it and the framework, and doing nothing led to more second operations.
- Diced cartilage was the only option showing measurable satisfaction improvement that lasted.
- Fat injection performed no better than doing nothing on the secondary procedure measure.
- Limits: 101 patients across four groups, one department, and the abstract contains an inconsistency in one comparison statement.
Why this paper matters
Camouflage choice for thin skin is usually a matter of surgeon preference, and this is presented as the first randomized comparison with over two years of follow-up. A level I design in rhinoplasty is rare. The four-group split means each arm is small.
Terms
- Thin-skinned: Having a thin nasal soft tissue covering that reveals the framework beneath.
- Diced cartilage: Cartilage cut into very small pieces and used as a mass.
- Lipofilling: Injecting the patient's own fat to add volume.
- Temporal fascia graft: A sheet of fibrous tissue taken from the temple.
- FACE-Q: A modular validated questionnaire covering facial appearance outcomes.
- Obagi skin pinch test: A clinical test estimating skin thickness by pinching it.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“This randomized controlled study aimed to analyse the long-term results of thin-skinned patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Materials And Methods: All the included study patients had the following characteristics: underwent primary rhinoplasty for functional and/or cosmetic problems, were thin-skinned, had been…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Anatomy and nasal analysis
325 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2020.
- ASJ Analysis of the Effects of Isotretinoin on Rhinoplasty PatientsYahyavi S, Jahandideh H, Izadi M et al.2020PMID 32756944Summary
- ASJ Commentary on: Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic ReviewBaker SB2020PMID 31181135
- ASJ 2020PMID 32232381
- ASJ Concept of Anatomic Columellar Strut Grafting in Rhinoplasty: An Algorithmic ApproachSantareno S, Taş S2020PMID 31675056
- ASJ Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic ReviewHassan Y, Leveille CF, Gallo L et al.2020PMID 31051500Summary
- ASJ Step-Specific Simulation: The Utility of 3D Printing for the Fabrication of a Low-Cost, Learning Needs-Based Rhinoplasty SimulatorZammit D, Safran T, Ponnudurai N et al.2020PMID 32064498Summary
- ASJ The Value of Averageness in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Humans Like Average Nosesvan Zijl FVWJ, Perrett DI, Lohuis PJFM et al.2020PMID 31960890Summary
- APS A Comparative Analysis of Patients' Quality of Life, Body Image and Self-confidence Before and After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty SurgeryBorujeni LA, Pourmotabed S, Abdoli Z et al.2020PMID 31832733Summary