Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2025
Preservation Rhinoplasty-Outcomes in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty
Ma CC, Most SP, Patel PN.
What this paper says
A review concluding that the limited literature supports preservation rhinoplasty as equal or better than conventional hump removal on patient reported outcomes, while leftover or returning humps remain a problem.
Overview
The recent resurgence of preservation rhinoplasty has been driven by theoretical advantages of keeping the keystone area intact, for both appearance and breathing, and by modified techniques that widened the range of noses it can treat. The authors review what the outcome literature actually shows and identify where it falls short.
Sections of note
- Article type: narrative review of outcomes, part of a clinics series. No new patient data are reported.
- Stated drivers of the resurgence: theoretical aesthetic and functional advantages of keystone preservation, plus modified techniques expanding indications.
- Stated finding: current literature is limited but supports superior or equivalent patient reported outcomes for preservation compared with conventional resection.
- Stated ongoing problem: residual hump or recurrence of bridge convexity.
- A variety of descriptive studies report excellent outcomes for modified methods of managing the bony vault and septum.
- Stated need: robust comparative studies to evaluate the benefits and indications of each approach.
- No pooled figures, study counts or effect sizes appear in the abstract.
What it means for a patient
- The evidence points toward preservation being at least as good as conventional hump removal on how patients rate their result.
- The recognized cost is the hump returning or never being fully removed, which is the trade off against a smoother bridge.
- Most supporting studies are descriptive single group reports, which reliably produce positive conclusions.
- The abstract carries no numbers. It characterizes the literature rather than summarizing findings from it.
Why this paper matters
Preservation rhinoplasty spread quickly on theory, and reviews assessing whether outcomes justify that are what turn a trend into established practice. This one concludes the evidence is favorable but thin, and explicitly calls for comparative studies. Which modified technique suits which nose remains unanswered.
Terms
- Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
- Keystone area: where the nasal bones meet the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
- Resection technique: the conventional approach removing the hump and rebuilding the bridge.
- Residual hump: a bump remaining on the bridge after surgery.
- Bony vault: the upper third of the nose formed by the paired nasal bones.
- Patient-reported outcome: a result recorded by the patient rather than the clinician.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“The recent resurgence of preservation rhinoplasty has been driven by theoretic esthetic and functional advantages of keystone preservation, as well as development of modified techniques that have expanded surgical indications. Current literature is limited but supports superior or equivalent patient-reported esthetic…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Authors on this site
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology
233 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced PrecisionGuilarte R, Malzone G2025PMID 39812015Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- ASJ Strategic Use of the V-Shaped Columella-Labial Incision for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty in Severely Compromised NosesSazgar AA, Sazgar MA, Zarei R et al.2025PMID 40408098Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Assessing the Long-Term Impact of Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study Using FACE-QLombardo GAG, Melita D, Stivala A et al.2025PMID 39747421Summary