rhinoplasty.cc
Menu

Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · Outcomes, satisfaction and psychology · 2025

FPS Clin Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · 2025

Preservation Rhinoplasty-Outcomes in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty

Ma CC, Most SP, Patel PN.

What this paper says

A review concluding that the limited literature supports preservation rhinoplasty as equal or better than conventional hump removal on patient reported outcomes, while leftover or returning humps remain a problem.

Overview

The recent resurgence of preservation rhinoplasty has been driven by theoretical advantages of keeping the keystone area intact, for both appearance and breathing, and by modified techniques that widened the range of noses it can treat. The authors review what the outcome literature actually shows and identify where it falls short.

Sections of note

  • Article type: narrative review of outcomes, part of a clinics series. No new patient data are reported.
  • Stated drivers of the resurgence: theoretical aesthetic and functional advantages of keystone preservation, plus modified techniques expanding indications.
  • Stated finding: current literature is limited but supports superior or equivalent patient reported outcomes for preservation compared with conventional resection.
  • Stated ongoing problem: residual hump or recurrence of bridge convexity.
  • A variety of descriptive studies report excellent outcomes for modified methods of managing the bony vault and septum.
  • Stated need: robust comparative studies to evaluate the benefits and indications of each approach.
  • No pooled figures, study counts or effect sizes appear in the abstract.

What it means for a patient

  • The evidence points toward preservation being at least as good as conventional hump removal on how patients rate their result.
  • The recognized cost is the hump returning or never being fully removed, which is the trade off against a smoother bridge.
  • Most supporting studies are descriptive single group reports, which reliably produce positive conclusions.
  • The abstract carries no numbers. It characterizes the literature rather than summarizing findings from it.

Why this paper matters

Preservation rhinoplasty spread quickly on theory, and reviews assessing whether outcomes justify that are what turn a trend into established practice. This one concludes the evidence is favorable but thin, and explicitly calls for comparative studies. Which modified technique suits which nose remains unanswered.

Terms

  • Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: lowering the bridge while keeping its natural surface intact.
  • Keystone area: where the nasal bones meet the upper lateral cartilages and septum.
  • Resection technique: the conventional approach removing the hump and rebuilding the bridge.
  • Residual hump: a bump remaining on the bridge after surgery.
  • Bony vault: the upper third of the nose formed by the paired nasal bones.
  • Patient-reported outcome: a result recorded by the patient rather than the clinician.

Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-09; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.

From the abstract

“The recent resurgence of preservation rhinoplasty has been driven by theoretic esthetic and functional advantages of keystone preservation, as well as development of modified techniques that have expanded surgical indications. Current literature is limited but supports superior or equivalent patient-reported esthetic…”

Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.

Citation

PubMed
Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
Year
2025
Authors
3
Type
Journal Article, Review
Access
Subscription
On this site
Summary and abstract

Authors on this site

Start here

What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.

Related papers

Same topic, 2025.

  1. ASJ
    2025PMID 39876773Summary
  2. ASJ
    2025PMID 39498873Summary
  3. ASJ
    2025PMID 39812015Summary
  4. ASJ
    2025PMID 40179243Summary
  5. ASJ
    2025PMID 40972537Summary
  6. ASJ
    2025PMID 40408098Summary
  7. APS
    2025PMID 38926251Full text
  8. APS
    2025PMID 39747421Summary