Journal archive · Preservation rhinoplasty · Dorsum and hump · 2025
Optimizing Closed-Approach Preservation Rhinoplasty by Ultrasonic Piezo-assisted Techniques for Enhanced Precision
Guilarte R, Malzone G.
What this paper says
In 734 closed preservation rhinoplasties over two years using purpose-adapted ultrasonic inserts, the revision rate was 6%, mostly for dorsal contour adjustments.
Overview
Ultrasonic (piezo) instruments cut bone precisely, but inside a closed rhinoplasty there is little room to use them. Guilarte and Malzone report 734 primary patients treated from May 2021 to April 2023 with closed preservation techniques enabled by piezo instruments and specialised instrumentation to improve visibility, documenting instrument adaptation, bone-reshaping precision and complication control.
Sections of note
- 734 primary rhinoplasty patients, closed approach, May 2021 to April 2023.
- Revision rate 6%, predominantly for dorsal contour adjustment.
- Minimal intraoperative bleeding, swelling and postoperative pain reported.
- Woodpecker SS18 and SS4 inserts were optimised for removing the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid and for lateral and transverse osteotomies.
- The authors state all osteotomies can now be done ultrasonically.
What it means for a patient
- Closed, scarless preservation rhinoplasty with ultrasonic bone work is being done at high volume with about 1 in 17 patients needing a touch-up.
- Most revisions were for small bridge irregularities, the known weak point of preservation.
- The paper reports the surgeons' own series without a comparison group or validated outcome scores.
Why this paper matters
It is a large series showing piezo instruments can be used through the closed approach, which had been a technical barrier. Limits: retrospective, single group, no patient-reported outcomes in the abstract, product-specific instrumentation.
Terms
- Closed approach: all incisions inside the nostrils.
- Piezotome: an ultrasonic bone-cutting handpiece.
- Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid: the bony upper back part of the septum.
- Lateral and transverse osteotomies: bone cuts along the side and across the top of the nasal bones.
Summary written by rhinoplasty.cc from the abstract, 2026-09-08; not medical advice. The authors' own abstract follows.
From the abstract
“Preservation rhinoplasty, particularly dorsal preservation, has gained prominence with the advent of piezoelectric instruments, which minimize trauma and enhance precision in bone reshaping. This approach presents unique challenges, especially in closed techniques, where spatial limitations complicate the use of…”
Excerpt; the full abstract is on PubMed.
Citation
Start here
What the rhinoplasty literature says on this paper's topics, cited line by line to PubMed.
Preservation rhinoplasty
193 papers on this topic.
Dorsum and hump
227 papers on this topic.
Related papers
Same topic, 2025.
- ASJ Closed Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Mestizo Patient: Challenges and Techniques for Nasal Tip SupportValdivia C, Durand PD, Çakir B2025PMID 39876773Summary
- ASJ Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyAlford JA, McCleary S, Roostaeian J2025PMID 39498873Summary
- ASJ Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation RhinoplastyKemal Ö, Tahir E, Çolak O et al.2025PMID 40179243Summary
- ASJ Scalpel vs Electrocautery for Upper Lateral Cartilage Contouring in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative StudyŞibar S, Erdal AI, Okutan MT2025PMID 40972537Summary
- APS A New Tool to Determine the Accurate Lateral Osteotomy Line in Rhinoplasty with PiezosurgeryGuliyev M2025PMID 38926251Full text
- APS Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation RhinoplastyRobotti E, Khazaal A, Leone F et al.2025PMID 39117869Summary
- APS Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisKim DH, Jang DW, Hwang SH2025PMID 40195129Summary
- APS Double-Tunnel Creation in Mucoperichondrial-Mucoperiosteal Septal Flap to Preserve the Sagittal Stability of Dorsal Components in RhinoplastyRajaee A, Tajik N, Karimi-Galougahi M2025PMID 40195130Summary